Adecco Group AG

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, HAS.L has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while HAS.L trades at $73.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas HAS.L's P/E ratio is -73.15. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAS.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is less volatile compared to HAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PAGE.L has a market cap of 859.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while PAGE.L trades at $275.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas PAGE.L's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAGE.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is less volatile compared to PAGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, IPEL.L has a market cap of 389.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while IPEL.L trades at $875.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas IPEL.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPEL.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is more volatile compared to IPEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, STEM.L has a market cap of 305.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while STEM.L trades at $239.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas STEM.L's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STEM.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is less volatile compared to STEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RWA.L has a market cap of 153.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while RWA.L trades at $234.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas RWA.L's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWA.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is less volatile compared to RWA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, STAF.L has a market cap of 31.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while STAF.L trades at $26.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas STAF.L's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAF.L's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is more volatile compared to STAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GATC.L has a market cap of 23.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while GATC.L trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas GATC.L's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GATC.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is more volatile compared to GATC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, EMR.L has a market cap of 16.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while EMR.L trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas EMR.L's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is more volatile compared to EMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RTC.L has a market cap of 11.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while RTC.L trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas RTC.L's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RTC.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is less volatile compared to RTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.

0QNM.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0QNM.L stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NBB.L has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QNM.L is priced at $23.15, while NBB.L trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0QNM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.72, whereas NBB.L's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, 0QNM.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBB.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QNM.L is more volatile compared to NBB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QNM.L.