Ems-Chemie Holding AG
Ems-Chemie Holding AG 0QM9.L Peers
See (0QM9.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0QM9.L | £730.00 | -1.68% | 17.1B | 31.03 | £23.53 | +2.19% |
| 0QPS.L | £3,293.00 | +0.31% | 30.3B | 37.26 | £88.37 | +1.66% |
| 0QJS.L | £17.81 | +0.11% | 5.9B | 17.09 | £1.04 | +2.36% |
| CRDA.L | £3,028.00 | +0.33% | 4.2B | 18.13 | £1.67 | +3.64% |
| JMAT.L | £1,669.00 | -0.42% | 2.8B | 7.91 | £2.11 | +7.88% |
| 0I74.L | £14.30 | +4.61% | 954.6M | 0.91 | £15.65 | N/A |
| ELM.L | £153.00 | -0.91% | 905.8M | -25.50 | -£0.06 | +1.67% |
| VCT.L | £782.00 | -0.26% | 680.2M | 23.00 | £0.34 | +7.60% |
| ESNT.L | £99.60 | +3.11% | 285M | 24.90 | £0.04 | +2.90% |
| SYNT.L | £110.80 | +0.36% | 181.1M | -2.58 | -£0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0QM9.L vs 0QPS.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 0QPS.L has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 0QPS.L trades at £3,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 0QPS.L's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QPS.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to 0QPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs 0QJS.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 0QJS.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 0QJS.L trades at £17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 0QJS.L's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QJS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to 0QJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs CRDA.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CRDA.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while CRDA.L trades at £3,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas CRDA.L's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRDA.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to CRDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs JMAT.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, JMAT.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while JMAT.L trades at £1,669.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas JMAT.L's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JMAT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to JMAT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs 0I74.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 0I74.L has a market cap of 954.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 0I74.L trades at £14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 0I74.L's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0I74.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to 0I74.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs ELM.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ELM.L has a market cap of 905.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ELM.L trades at £153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ELM.L's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELM.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to ELM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs VCT.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VCT.L has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while VCT.L trades at £782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas VCT.L's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VCT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to VCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs ESNT.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ESNT.L has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ESNT.L trades at £99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ESNT.L's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESNT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to ESNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs SYNT.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SYNT.L has a market cap of 181.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while SYNT.L trades at £110.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas SYNT.L's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYNT.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to SYNT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs TET.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, TET.L has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while TET.L trades at £276.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas TET.L's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TET.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to TET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs 0HB7.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 0HB7.L has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 0HB7.L trades at £2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 0HB7.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HB7.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QM9.L has daily volatility of 0.82 and 0HB7.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QM9.L vs ZTF.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ZTF.L has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ZTF.L trades at £317.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ZTF.L's P/E ratio is -52.83. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZTF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to ZTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs 49GP.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 49GP.L has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 49GP.L trades at £90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 49GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 49GP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to 49GP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs 50GP.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 50GP.L has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 50GP.L trades at £83.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 50GP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 50GP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to 50GP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs IOF.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, IOF.L has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while IOF.L trades at £26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas IOF.L's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IOF.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to IOF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs ITX.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ITX.L has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ITX.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ITX.L's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITX.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to ITX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs GEX.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GEX.L has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while GEX.L trades at £7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas GEX.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GEX.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to GEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs DCTA.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, DCTA.L has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while DCTA.L trades at £7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas DCTA.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCTA.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to DCTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs HDD.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, HDD.L has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while HDD.L trades at £8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas HDD.L's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HDD.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to HDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs HAYD.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, HAYD.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while HAYD.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas HAYD.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HAYD.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to HAYD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs AGM.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, AGM.L has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while AGM.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas AGM.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AGM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to AGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs VRS.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VRS.L has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while VRS.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas VRS.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRS.L's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to VRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs ESKN.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ESKN.L has a market cap of 714.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ESKN.L trades at £0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ESKN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESKN.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to ESKN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs ZED.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ZED.L has a market cap of 528.5K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while ZED.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas ZED.L's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZED.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to ZED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs BIOM.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, BIOM.L has a market cap of 386.7K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while BIOM.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas BIOM.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIOM.L's ROE of -3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is less volatile compared to BIOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.
0QM9.L vs MACP.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MACP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while MACP.L trades at £1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas MACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MACP.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QM9.L has daily volatility of 0.82 and MACP.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QM9.L vs 87FZ.L Comparison
0QM9.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QM9.L stands at 17.1B. In comparison, 87FZ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QM9.L is priced at £730.00, while 87FZ.L trades at £0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 31.03, whereas 87FZ.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 0QM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 87FZ.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QM9.L is more volatile compared to 87FZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QM9.L.