Axactor ASA
Axactor ASA 0QIG.L Peers
See (0QIG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0QIG.L | £6.52 | N/A | 1.8B | -4.81 | -£1.36 | N/A |
| 0R2Z.L | £344.86 | N/A | 310.8B | 24.22 | £14.24 | +0.50% |
| GACB.L | £110.00 | +7.84% | 30.8B | 1.83 | £0.60 | +0.38% |
| GACA.L | £110.00 | +6.80% | 30.8B | 1.83 | £0.60 | +0.51% |
| LENZ.L | £108.00 | N/A | 645.8M | -0.49 | -£2.20 | N/A |
| PFG.L | £225.00 | N/A | 571.2M | 5.49 | £0.41 | N/A |
| FCH.L | £120.00 | -1.64% | 359.8M | 0.86 | £1.39 | N/A |
| IPF.L | £159.00 | -0.13% | 346.8M | 6.12 | £0.26 | +7.17% |
| EQLS.L | £139.50 | N/A | 282.1M | 34.88 | £0.04 | +0.04% |
| HAT.L | £640.00 | +0.31% | 278.3M | 12.55 | £0.51 | +2.81% |
Stock Comparison
0QIG.L vs 0R2Z.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0R2Z.L has a market cap of 310.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while 0R2Z.L trades at £344.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas 0R2Z.L's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0R2Z.L's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to 0R2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs GACB.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GACB.L has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while GACB.L trades at £110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas GACB.L's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GACB.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to GACB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs GACA.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GACA.L has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while GACA.L trades at £110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas GACA.L's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GACA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to GACA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs LENZ.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LENZ.L has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while LENZ.L trades at £108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas LENZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LENZ.L's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to LENZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs PFG.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PFG.L has a market cap of 571.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while PFG.L trades at £225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas PFG.L's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PFG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to PFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs FCH.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FCH.L has a market cap of 359.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while FCH.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas FCH.L's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FCH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to FCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs IPF.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPF.L has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while IPF.L trades at £159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas IPF.L's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IPF.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to IPF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs EQLS.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EQLS.L has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while EQLS.L trades at £139.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas EQLS.L's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EQLS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to EQLS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs HAT.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HAT.L has a market cap of 278.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while HAT.L trades at £640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas HAT.L's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HAT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to HAT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs VANQ.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VANQ.L has a market cap of 228.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while VANQ.L trades at £89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas VANQ.L's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VANQ.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to VANQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs SUS.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SUS.L has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while SUS.L trades at £1,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas SUS.L's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SUS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to SUS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs 47IE.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 47IE.L has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while 47IE.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas 47IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 47IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to 47IE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs ASAI.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASAI.L has a market cap of 145M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while ASAI.L trades at £145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas ASAI.L's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASAI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to ASAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs TRU.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRU.L has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while TRU.L trades at £89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas TRU.L's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRU.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to TRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs APP.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, APP.L has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while APP.L trades at £42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas APP.L's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to APP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to APP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs DFCH.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DFCH.L has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while DFCH.L trades at £39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas DFCH.L's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DFCH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to DFCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs BFSP.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BFSP.L has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while BFSP.L trades at £96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas BFSP.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BFSP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to BFSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs TIME.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TIME.L has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while TIME.L trades at £58.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas TIME.L's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TIME.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to TIME.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs LIT.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LIT.L has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while LIT.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas LIT.L's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to LIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs AWEM.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AWEM.L has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while AWEM.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas AWEM.L's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AWEM.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to AWEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs BANK.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BANK.L has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while BANK.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas BANK.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BANK.L's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to BANK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs CIN.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIN.L has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while CIN.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas CIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CIN.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QIG.L has daily volatility of 5.60 and CIN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QIG.L vs ORCH.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ORCH.L has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while ORCH.L trades at £48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas ORCH.L's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ORCH.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to ORCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs VCAP.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VCAP.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while VCAP.L trades at £10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas VCAP.L's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VCAP.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to VCAP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs LEND.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LEND.L has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while LEND.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas LEND.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to LEND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs ZAIM.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZAIM.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while ZAIM.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas ZAIM.L's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZAIM.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to ZAIM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs AMGO.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMGO.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while AMGO.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas AMGO.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMGO.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is less volatile compared to AMGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs NSF.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NSF.L has a market cap of 274.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while NSF.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas NSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NSF.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to NSF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs PCF.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PCF.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while PCF.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas PCF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PCF.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QIG.L has daily volatility of 5.60 and PCF.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QIG.L vs MCL.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while MCL.L trades at £0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas MCL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MCL.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to MCL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.
0QIG.L vs TSL.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TSL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while TSL.L trades at £28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas TSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TSL.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0QIG.L has daily volatility of 5.60 and TSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0QIG.L vs 46IE.L Comparison
0QIG.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0QIG.L stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 46IE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0QIG.L is priced at £6.52, while 46IE.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0QIG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -4.81, whereas 46IE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0QIG.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 46IE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0QIG.L is more volatile compared to 46IE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0QIG.L.