Vanguard U.K. Government Bond Index Fund EUR Hedged Acc
Vanguard U.K. Government Bond Index Fund EUR Hedged Acc 0P0001LJIZ.F Peers
See (0P0001LJIZ.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P0001LJIZ.F | €67.52 | -0.28% | 8.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXRL.DE | €139.63 | +0.00% | 6.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EUNH.DE | €111.79 | +0.00% | 5.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.07% |
| VECA.DE | €52.59 | -0.01% | 4.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VECP.DE | €48.85 | +0.01% | 4.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.41% |
| VAGF.DE | €23.51 | -0.01% | 4.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VAGE.DE | €21.01 | +0.01% | 4.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.36% |
| SPFV.DE | €30.96 | -0.01% | 4.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SPFE.DE | €26.45 | +0.01% | 4.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.00% |
| SPFB.DE | €28.70 | -0.01% | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | +2.96% |
Stock Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SXRL.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXRL.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SXRL.DE trades at €139.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXRL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SXRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUNH.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNH.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUNH.DE trades at €111.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VECA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VECA.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VECA.DE trades at €52.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VECA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VECA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VECP.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VECP.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VECP.DE trades at €48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VECP.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VECP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VAGF.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VAGF.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VAGF.DE trades at €23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VAGF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VAGF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VAGE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VAGE.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VAGE.DE trades at €21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VAGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VAGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPFV.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPFV.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPFV.DE trades at €30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPFV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPFV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPFE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPFE.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPFE.DE trades at €26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPFE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPFE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPFB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPFB.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPFB.DE trades at €28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPFB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPFB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPFU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPFU.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPFU.DE trades at €30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPFU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPFU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SXRM.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXRM.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SXRM.DE trades at €150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXRM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SXRM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs D5BG.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, D5BG.DE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while D5BG.DE trades at €160.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to D5BG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to D5BG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs OM3F.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, OM3F.DE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while OM3F.DE trades at €4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OM3F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to OM3F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VDCE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VDCE.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VDCE.DE trades at €54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VDCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VDCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VUCE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VUCE.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VUCE.DE trades at €50.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VUCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VUCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VUCP.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VUCP.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VUCP.DE trades at €40.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VUCP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VUCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XEC1.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XEC1.F has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XEC1.F trades at €7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEC1.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XEC1.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XEC1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs X03F.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, X03F.DE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while X03F.DE trades at €173.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X03F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to X03F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to X03F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IUSM.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSM.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IUSM.DE trades at €147.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IUSM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs CB3G.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CB3G.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while CB3G.DE trades at €220.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CB3G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to CB3G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCD.DE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCD.DE trades at €86.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs BBLL.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, BBLL.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while BBLL.DE trades at €98.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BBLL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to BBLL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs JBEM.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, JBEM.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while JBEM.DE trades at €9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JBEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to JBEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs DBXN.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DBXN.DE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while DBXN.DE trades at €221.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to DBXN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IUSP.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSP.DE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IUSP.DE trades at €39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IUSP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs ASRI.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ASRI.DE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while ASRI.DE trades at €10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASRI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to ASRI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCN.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCN.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCN.DE trades at €162.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IUSU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IUSU.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IUSU.DE trades at €109.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IUSU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IUSU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VGTY.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGTY.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VGTY.DE trades at €18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGTY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGTY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VGTY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs DBZB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DBZB.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while DBZB.DE trades at €209.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBZB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBZB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to DBZB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs ASR3.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ASR3.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while ASR3.DE trades at €9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASR3.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to ASR3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XB4F.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XB4F.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XB4F.DE trades at €143.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XB4F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XB4F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XB4F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCS.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCS.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCS.DE trades at €125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUNA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNA.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUNA.DE trades at €4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUNA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCA.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCA.DE trades at €142.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs LYQ2.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYQ2.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while LYQ2.DE trades at €126.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYQ2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to LYQ2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUN4.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUN4.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUN4.DE trades at €109.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUN4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUN4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SECA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SECA.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SECA.DE trades at €4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SECA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SECA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPFD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPFD.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPFD.DE trades at €27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPFD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPFD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs MDBA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, MDBA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while MDBA.DE trades at €10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MDBA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to MDBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs MDBU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, MDBU.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while MDBU.DE trades at €9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MDBU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to MDBU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XHYG.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XHYG.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XHYG.DE trades at €16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XHYG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XHYG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XHYA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XHYA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XHYA.DE trades at €23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XHYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XHYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs CBUJ.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, CBUJ.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while CBUJ.DE trades at €5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CBUJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to CBUJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IPAB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IPAB.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IPAB.DE trades at €5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IPAB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and IPAB.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUNU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNU.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUNU.DE trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUNU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBB1.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBB1.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBB1.DE trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBB1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBB1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and IBB1.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs DBXP.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, DBXP.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while DBXP.DE trades at €172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DBXP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to DBXP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IPAB.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IPAB.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IPAB.F trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IPAB.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IPAB.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs MTDD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, MTDD.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while MTDD.DE trades at €156.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTDD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTDD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to MTDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs LYXD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYXD.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while LYXD.DE trades at €168.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYXD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to LYXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPF2.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPF2.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPF2.DE trades at €35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPF2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPF2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SPF1.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SPF1.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SPF1.DE trades at €42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPF1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SPF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EGV5.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EGV5.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EGV5.F trades at €125.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV5.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EGV5.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EGV5.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs 0P000019FE.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P000019FE.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while 0P000019FE.F trades at €137.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000019FE.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P000019FE.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and 0P000019FE.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs 0P00012I68.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P00012I68.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while 0P00012I68.F trades at €129.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I68.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P00012I68.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and 0P00012I68.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs 0P0000J59O.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 0P0000J59O.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while 0P0000J59O.F trades at €158.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000J59O.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 0P0000J59O.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and 0P0000J59O.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCI.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCI.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCI.DE trades at €231.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IS0X.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IS0X.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IS0X.DE trades at €77.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0X.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IS0X.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IS0X.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs ZPRC.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, ZPRC.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while ZPRC.DE trades at €46.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZPRC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to ZPRC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SYBD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SYBD.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SYBD.DE trades at €30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYBD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SYBD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SYBB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SYBB.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SYBB.DE trades at €57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYBB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SYBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs VGEM.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, VGEM.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while VGEM.DE trades at €36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VGEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to VGEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XY4P.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XY4P.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XY4P.DE trades at €180.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XY4P.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XY4P.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XY4P.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XYPD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XYPD.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XYPD.DE trades at €147.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYPD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XYPD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XYPD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs TRDE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TRDE.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while TRDE.DE trades at €31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRDE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to TRDE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs NADB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NADB.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while NADB.DE trades at €141.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NADB.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and NADB.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs LYQ6.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYQ6.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while LYQ6.DE trades at €199.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ6.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYQ6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to LYQ6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs TRDX.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, TRDX.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while TRDX.DE trades at €30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRDX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to TRDX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs V3GE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, V3GE.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while V3GE.DE trades at €4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to V3GE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to V3GE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XDGE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDGE.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XDGE.DE trades at €10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XDGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs E15H.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, E15H.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while E15H.DE trades at €142.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E15H.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to E15H.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to E15H.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUNR.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNR.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUNR.DE trades at €110.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUNR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IEXA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IEXA.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IEXA.DE trades at €5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEXA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IEXA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F and IEXA.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XDGU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XDGU.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XDGU.DE trades at €10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XDGU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XDGU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs D5BB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, D5BB.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while D5BB.DE trades at €169.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to D5BB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to D5BB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SUA0.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SUA0.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SUA0.DE trades at €5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUA0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SUA0.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SUA0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IS0M.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IS0M.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IS0M.DE trades at €152.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0M.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IS0M.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IS0M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XAT1.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XAT1.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XAT1.DE trades at €16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAT1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XAT1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XAT1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs LYEB.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, LYEB.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while LYEB.DE trades at €153.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYEB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYEB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to LYEB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs 36BA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 36BA.DE has a market cap of 967.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while 36BA.DE trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 36BA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 36BA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to 36BA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SYB3.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SYB3.DE has a market cap of 964.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SYB3.DE trades at €52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYB3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYB3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SYB3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs KX1G.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, KX1G.DE has a market cap of 950.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while KX1G.DE trades at €231.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KX1G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KX1G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to KX1G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs X1GD.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, X1GD.DE has a market cap of 950.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while X1GD.DE trades at €197.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X1GD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to X1GD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to X1GD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs NADB.F Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, NADB.F has a market cap of 950.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while NADB.F trades at €137.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADB.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NADB.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to NADB.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCM.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCM.DE has a market cap of 944.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCM.DE trades at €188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUN3.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUN3.DE has a market cap of 901.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUN3.DE trades at €78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUN3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EFRN.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EFRN.DE has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EFRN.DE trades at €5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFRN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EFRN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EFRN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XGII.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XGII.DE has a market cap of 862.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XGII.DE trades at €191.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGII.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XGII.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XGII.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBCL.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBCL.DE has a market cap of 853.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBCL.DE trades at €171.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBCL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBCL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs XGIU.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, XGIU.DE has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while XGIU.DE trades at €21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGIU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XGIU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to XGIU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUNX.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUNX.DE has a market cap of 847.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUNX.DE trades at €79.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUNX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SXRP.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SXRP.DE has a market cap of 832.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SXRP.DE trades at €133.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SXRP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SXRP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IBC9.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IBC9.DE has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IBC9.DE trades at €78.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC9.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IBC9.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IBC9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs SYBC.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, SYBC.DE has a market cap of 804.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while SYBC.DE trades at €54.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYBC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to SYBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EMIE.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EMIE.DE has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EMIE.DE trades at €11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMIE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EMIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EMIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs IE3E.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, IE3E.DE has a market cap of 748.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while IE3E.DE trades at €5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE3E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IE3E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to IE3E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs 5UOA.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, 5UOA.DE has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while 5UOA.DE trades at €4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5UOA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to 5UOA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to 5UOA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.
0P0001LJIZ.F vs EUN6.DE Comparison
0P0001LJIZ.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001LJIZ.F stands at 8.6B. In comparison, EUN6.DE has a market cap of 705.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001LJIZ.F is priced at €67.52, while EUN6.DE trades at €99.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001LJIZ.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN6.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EUN6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001LJIZ.F is less volatile compared to EUN6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001LJIZ.F.