Vanguard Investments Money Market Funds - Vanguard Sterling Short-Term Money Market A GBP Inc
Vanguard Investments Money Market Funds - Vanguard Sterling Short-Term Money Market A GBP Inc (0P0001I2A0.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P0001I2A0.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P0001I2A0.L | £1.00 | +0.02% | 16.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LQQ3.L | £18,689.50 | -8.19% | 39.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSDX.L | £845.10 | +3.26% | 13.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3LUS.L | £8,756.00 | -7.09% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3LGO.L | £7,987.00 | +4.62% | 10B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3NVD.L | £4,390.00 | -8.56% | 9.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSD2.L | £49.07 | +5.87% | 8.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VDST.L | £57.17 | +0.07% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IGSD.L | £76.09 | +0.07% | 5.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.26% |
| VILX.L | £786.50 | +20.44% | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P0001I2A0.L vs LQQ3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LQQ3.L has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LQQ3.L trades at £18,689.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQQ3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LQQ3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LQQ3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LQQ3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs XSDX.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, XSDX.L has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while XSDX.L trades at £845.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSDX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSDX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to XSDX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check XSDX.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LUS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LUS.L has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LUS.L trades at £8,756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LUS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LGO.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LGO.L has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LGO.L trades at £7,987.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LGO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LGO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LGO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LGO.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3NVD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3NVD.L has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3NVD.L trades at £4,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3NVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3NVD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3NVD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3NVD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs XSD2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, XSD2.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while XSD2.L trades at £49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSD2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSD2.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to XSD2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check XSD2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs VDST.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, VDST.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while VDST.L trades at £57.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VDST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to VDST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check VDST.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs IGSD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, IGSD.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while IGSD.L trades at £76.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to IGSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check IGSD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs VILX.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, VILX.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while VILX.L trades at £786.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VILX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VILX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to VILX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check VILX.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs GBS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, GBS.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while GBS.L trades at £307.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to GBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check GBS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs VISE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, VISE.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while VISE.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VISE.L's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VISE.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and VISE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VISE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs XSSX.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, XSSX.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while XSSX.L trades at £556.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSSX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSSX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to XSSX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check XSSX.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3ULS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3ULS.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3ULS.L trades at £973.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3ULS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3ULS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3ULS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3ULS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LDE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LDE.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LDE.L trades at £42,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LDE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SDE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SDE.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SDE.L trades at £17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SDE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs DS2P.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, DS2P.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while DS2P.L trades at £56.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DS2P.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DS2P.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to DS2P.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check DS2P.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3FB.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3FB.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3FB.L trades at £961.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3FB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3FB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3FB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3FB.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2NVD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2NVD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2NVD.L trades at £5,173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2NVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2NVD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2NVD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2NVD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3UKS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3UKS.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3UKS.L trades at £182.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3UKS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3UKS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3UKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3UKS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3TYL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3TYL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3TYL.L trades at £5,812.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3TYL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3TYL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3TYL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3TYL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2TSL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2TSL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2TSL.L trades at £7,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2TSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2TSL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2TSL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2TSL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SUK2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SUK2.L has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SUK2.L trades at £263.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUK2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUK2.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to SUK2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check SUK2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3GIL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3GIL.L has a market cap of 828.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3GIL.L trades at £6,727.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3GIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3GIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3GIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3GIL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3GOO.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3GOO.L has a market cap of 781.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3GOO.L trades at £3,612.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3GOO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3GOO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3GOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3GOO.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3MSF.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3MSF.L has a market cap of 721.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3MSF.L trades at £7,169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3MSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3MSF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3MSF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3MSF.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs XUKS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, XUKS.L has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while XUKS.L trades at £273.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUKS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XUKS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to XUKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check XUKS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs QQQ3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, QQQ3.L has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while QQQ3.L trades at £247.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQ3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to QQQ3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check QQQ3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3PYP.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3PYP.L has a market cap of 479.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3PYP.L trades at £889.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3PYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3PYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3PYP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3PYP.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2AMZ.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2AMZ.L has a market cap of 444.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2AMZ.L trades at £5,637.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2AMZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2AMZ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2AMZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2AMZ.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3GIS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3GIS.L has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3GIS.L trades at £6,741.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3GIS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3GIS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3GIS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3GIS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 1MCS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 1MCS.L has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 1MCS.L trades at £3,539.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 1MCS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 1MCS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 1MCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 1MCS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs URGB.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, URGB.L has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while URGB.L trades at £4,754.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to URGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and URGB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check URGB.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2NFL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2NFL.L has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2NFL.L trades at £8,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2NFL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2NFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2NFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2NFL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs GBJP.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, GBJP.L has a market cap of 300M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while GBJP.L trades at £2,677.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBJP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBJP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to GBJP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check GBJP.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3BID.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3BID.L has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3BID.L trades at £265.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3BID.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3BID.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3BID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3BID.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3BA.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3BA.L has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3BA.L trades at £2,637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3BA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3BA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3BA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3BA.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs TSL3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, TSL3.L has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while TSL3.L trades at £9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSL3.L's P/E ratio is 53.73. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TSL3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to TSL3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check TSL3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs S3CO.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, S3CO.L has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while S3CO.L trades at £4,889.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S3CO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to S3CO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to S3CO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check S3CO.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3NFL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3NFL.L has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3NFL.L trades at £18,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3NFL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3NFL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3NFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3NFL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2UKL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2UKL.L has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2UKL.L trades at £24,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2UKL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2UKL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2UKL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2UKL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs STSL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, STSL.L has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while STSL.L trades at £2,580.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to STSL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and STSL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STSL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3TSE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3TSE.L has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3TSE.L trades at £8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3TSE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3TSE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3TSE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3TSE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2FB.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2FB.L has a market cap of 188M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2FB.L trades at £4,390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2FB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2FB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2FB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2FB.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LGL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LGL.L has a market cap of 162.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LGL.L trades at £316.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LGL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3GOL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3GOL.L has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3GOL.L trades at £105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3GOL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3GOL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3GOL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3GOL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3TYS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3TYS.L has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3TYS.L trades at £7,769.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3TYS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3TYS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and 3TYS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3TYS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3RAC.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3RAC.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3RAC.L trades at £2,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3RAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3RAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3RAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3RAC.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SIL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SIL.L has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SIL.L trades at £74.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SIL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2GS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2GS.L has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2GS.L trades at £5,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2GS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2GS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2GS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2GS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs QUID.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, QUID.L has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while QUID.L trades at £103.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUID.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QUID.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to QUID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check QUID.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LSI.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LSI.L has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LSI.L trades at £5,637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LSI.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LOIL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LOIL.L has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LOIL.L trades at £10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOIL.L's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LOIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LOIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LOIL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2VIS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2VIS.L has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2VIS.L trades at £6,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2VIS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2VIS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2VIS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2VIS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs QQQS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, QQQS.L has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while QQQS.L trades at £4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to QQQS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check QQQS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs GBUS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, GBUS.L has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while GBUS.L trades at £5,617.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBUS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to GBUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check GBUS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SQ.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SQ.L has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SQ.L trades at £522.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SQ.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3JD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3JD.L has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3JD.L trades at £351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3JD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3JD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3JD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3JD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LRI.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LRI.L has a market cap of 60.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LRI.L trades at £1,381.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LRI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LRI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LRI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LRI.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs VIXL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, VIXL.L has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while VIXL.L trades at £10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIXL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VIXL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to VIXL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check VIXL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3NGL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3NGL.L has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3NGL.L trades at £7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3NGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3NGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3NGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3NGL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LSIL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LSIL.L has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LSIL.L trades at £8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSIL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LSIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LSIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LSIL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LNV.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LNV.L has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LNV.L trades at £35.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LNV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LNV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LNV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LNV.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs XT2D.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, XT2D.L has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while XT2D.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XT2D.L's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XT2D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to XT2D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check XT2D.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3NGS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3NGS.L has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3NGS.L trades at £21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3NGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3NGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3NGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3NGS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SRI.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SRI.L has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SRI.L trades at £1,832.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SRI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SRI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and 3SRI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 3SRI.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LBUL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LBUL.L has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LBUL.L trades at £134.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LBUL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LBUL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LBUL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs GSSS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, GSSS.L has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while GSSS.L trades at £132.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSSS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and GSSS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSSS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3PRE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3PRE.L has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3PRE.L trades at £1,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3PRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3PRE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3PRE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LGS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LGS.L has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LGS.L trades at £1,626.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LGS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LGS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LGS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LGS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3USS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3USS.L has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3USS.L trades at £12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3USS.L's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3USS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3USS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3USS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs DEL2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, DEL2.L has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while DEL2.L trades at £655.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEL2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DEL2.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to DEL2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check DEL2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2JPM.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2JPM.L has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2JPM.L trades at £5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2JPM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2JPM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2JPM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2JPM.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SBP.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SBP.L has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SBP.L trades at £2,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SBP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SBP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SBP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SBP.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3DIS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3DIS.L has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3DIS.L trades at £20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3DIS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3DIS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3DIS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3DIS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LTS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LTS.L has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LTS.L trades at £2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LTS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LTS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LTS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SNVD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SNVD.L has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SNVD.L trades at £1,484.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNVD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SNVD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to SNVD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check SNVD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 2AMD.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 2AMD.L has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 2AMD.L trades at £3,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2AMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 2AMD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 2AMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 2AMD.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LCOC.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LCOC.L has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LCOC.L trades at £68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCOC.L's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LCOC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LCOC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LCOC.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3DEL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3DEL.L has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3DEL.L trades at £484.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3DEL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3DEL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3DEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3DEL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SSQ.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SSQ.L has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SSQ.L trades at £251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SSQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and SSQ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSQ.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs DES2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, DES2.L has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while DES2.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DES2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DES2.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to DES2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check DES2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SXO.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SXO.L has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SXO.L trades at £670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SXO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SXO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SXO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SXO.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3LAZ.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3LAZ.L has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3LAZ.L trades at £2,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LAZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3LAZ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3LAZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3LAZ.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3EUL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3EUL.L has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3EUL.L trades at £435.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3EUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3EUL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3EUL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3EUL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs AMD3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, AMD3.L has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while AMD3.L trades at £1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD3.L's P/E ratio is 97.18. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AMD3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to AMD3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check AMD3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3FBE.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3FBE.L has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3FBE.L trades at £11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3FBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3FBE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3FBE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3FBE.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs NVD2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, NVD2.L has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while NVD2.L trades at £68.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVD2.L's P/E ratio is 62.37. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to NVD2.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to NVD2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check NVD2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3SBC.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3SBC.L has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3SBC.L trades at £2,044.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SBC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SBC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3SBC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3SBC.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LPLA.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LPLA.L has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LPLA.L trades at £2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LPLA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LPLA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LPLA.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SUP3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SUP3.L has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SUP3.L trades at £3,709.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUP3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUP3.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and SUP3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUP3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 0P0001I2A1.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 0P0001I2A1.L has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 0P0001I2A1.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001I2A1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001I2A1.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and 0P0001I2A1.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001I2A1.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3BP.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3BP.L has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3BP.L trades at £200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3BP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3BP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3BP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3BP.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs EUP3.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, EUP3.L has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while EUP3.L trades at £2,263.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUP3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EUP3.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L and EUP3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EUP3.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3GOS.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3GOS.L has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3GOS.L trades at £4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3GOS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3GOS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3GOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3GOS.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs LBRT.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, LBRT.L has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while LBRT.L trades at £50.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to LBRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check LBRT.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs TSL2.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, TSL2.L has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while TSL2.L trades at £103.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSL2.L's P/E ratio is 53.28. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TSL2.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to TSL2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check TSL2.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs 3BSR.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, 3BSR.L has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while 3BSR.L trades at £43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3BSR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 3BSR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to 3BSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check 3BSR.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SOIL.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SOIL.L has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SOIL.L trades at £16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOIL.L's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SOIL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to SOIL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check SOIL.L's competition here
0P0001I2A0.L vs SMSF.L Comparison August 2025
0P0001I2A0.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001I2A0.L stands at 16.8M. In comparison, SMSF.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001I2A0.L is priced at £1.00, while SMSF.L trades at £382.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001I2A0.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMSF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001I2A0.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SMSF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001I2A0.L is less volatile compared to SMSF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001I2A0.L.Check SMSF.L's competition here