Indépendance AM Europe Small A (C)
Indépendance AM Europe Small A (C) 0P0001DKPM.F Peers
See (0P0001DKPM.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P0001DKPM.F | €199.66 | -1.07% | 479.9M | 12.75 | €15.66 | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €347.70 | -0.40% | 2.9T | 16.42 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €301.14 | -0.40% | 2.5T | 16.42 | €18.34 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €284.17 | -0.58% | 2.4T | 14.18 | €20.04 | N/A |
| FRCJ.DE | €22.86 | -0.61% | 781.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.09% |
| BBN1.F | €131.00 | -0.95% | 158.7B | 46.29 | €2.83 | +2.63% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €73.37 | -0.82% | 113B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €23.76 | -0.71% | 105.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €565.06 | -0.72% | 101.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €347.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F and 0P00000MO4.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001DKPM.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €301.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F and 0P00000W6B.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001DKPM.F vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €284.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F and 0P00001QSE.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001DKPM.F vs FRCJ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, FRCJ.DE has a market cap of 781.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while FRCJ.DE trades at €22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas FRCJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to FRCJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to FRCJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs BBN1.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while BBN1.F trades at €131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while ZPDW.DE trades at €73.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while U1FB.DE trades at €23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SXR8.DE trades at €565.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EUNL.DE trades at €100.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VUSA.DE trades at €100.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VUAA.DE trades at €101.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SXRZ.DE trades at €236.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs E500.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while E500.DE trades at €48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VGWL.DE trades at €127.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs P500.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while P500.DE trades at €1,050.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs D500.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while D500.DE trades at €49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VWCE.DE trades at €130.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VGWL.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs A4S.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F and A4S.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001DKPM.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,050.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while AW1Q.DE trades at €17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IS3N.DE trades at €33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IBC3.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SPY5.DE trades at €529.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while PPFB.SG trades at €54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while LYP2.DE trades at €308.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XDWL.DE trades at €92.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XDWD.DE trades at €109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs TR1.DU Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while TR1.DU trades at €84.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while LYPS.DE trades at €54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 6TVM.DE trades at €54.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IUSA.DE trades at €52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,105.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IUSZ.DE trades at €9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IUSQ.DE trades at €83.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while JUHE.DE trades at €50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EQQQ.DE trades at €471.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SPPW.DE trades at €36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EUN5.DE trades at €122.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SGAS.DE trades at €10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while JRUD.DE trades at €49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs JREU.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while JREU.DE trades at €52.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XDEW.DE trades at €85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EUNK.DE trades at €85.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while QDVE.DE trades at €31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XD9E.DE trades at €126.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DWS.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DWS.DE trades at €47.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EGV2.DE trades at €101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XD9U.DE trades at €155.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XD9D.DE trades at €20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while D5BM.DE trades at €105.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while LYYA.DE trades at €343.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs STXH.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while STXH.DE trades at €140.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IQQY.DE trades at €33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while LYP6.DE trades at €258.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXS1.DE trades at €197.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXIC.DE trades at €6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F and 0P00000SUJ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P0001DKPM.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXW1.DE trades at €53.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XWEH.DE trades at €43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DBXW.DE trades at €107.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VGVF.DE trades at €103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VGVE.DE trades at €99.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IQQW.DE trades at €73.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XZMU.DE trades at €57.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while VGWD.DE trades at €63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs EXIC.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while H4ZF.DE trades at €53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DECR.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DECR.DE trades at €47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XMME.F Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DBXD.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DBXD.DE trades at €223.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs IBCF.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while IBCF.DE trades at €130.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs DBXU.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XZW0.DE trades at €39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while SPP1.DE trades at €21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs H1D5.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while H1D5.DE trades at €149.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs AUM5.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while AUM5.DE trades at €104.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs AEMD.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while AEMD.DE trades at €52.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XMME.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XMME.DE trades at €55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs XIEE.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while XIEE.DE trades at €77.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.
0P0001DKPM.F vs AMEW.DE Comparison
0P0001DKPM.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P0001DKPM.F stands at 479.9M. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0001DKPM.F is priced at €199.66, while AMEW.DE trades at €549.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P0001DKPM.F currently has a P/E ratio of 12.75, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, 0P0001DKPM.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0001DKPM.F is less volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0001DKPM.F.