Vanguard Global Balanced Fund A GBP Acc
Vanguard Global Balanced Fund A GBP Acc 0P000185T5.L Peers
See (0P000185T5.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P000185T5.L | £196.95 | +0.02% | 9.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IH2O.L | £5,313.50 | +0.44% | 165.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.18% |
| INRG.L | £546.25 | +1.11% | 145.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.36% |
| PRIW.L | £3,008.63 | +1.36% | 116.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JMRE.L | £2,516.25 | +0.06% | 107.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XGSD.L | £2,501.50 | +0.44% | 54.4B | N/A | N/A | +5.14% |
| ROBG.L | £1,695.00 | +0.24% | 44.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BCHS.L | £9,238.50 | +2.21% | 44.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LGGG.L | £1,604.60 | +0.49% | 27.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| XSGI.L | £5,139.00 | +0.33% | 24.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P000185T5.L vs IH2O.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, IH2O.L has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while IH2O.L trades at £5,313.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IH2O.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to IH2O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs INRG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, INRG.L has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while INRG.L trades at £546.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to INRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PRIW.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PRIW.L has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PRIW.L trades at £3,008.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JMRE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JMRE.L has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JMRE.L trades at £2,516.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JMRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to JMRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs XGSD.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, XGSD.L has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while XGSD.L trades at £2,501.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGSD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to XGSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs ROBG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, ROBG.L has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while ROBG.L trades at £1,695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to ROBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs BCHS.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, BCHS.L has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while BCHS.L trades at £9,238.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to BCHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs LGGG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, LGGG.L has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while LGGG.L trades at £1,604.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LGGG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to LGGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs XSGI.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, XSGI.L has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while XSGI.L trades at £5,139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSGI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and XSGI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs GGRG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GGRG.L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GGRG.L trades at £3,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GGRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PRIG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PRIG.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PRIG.L trades at £1,426.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PRIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JREG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JREG.L has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JREG.L trades at £53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JREG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to JREG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs CECL.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, CECL.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while CECL.L trades at £1,648.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CECL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and CECL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs JGRE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JGRE.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JGRE.L trades at £3,934.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JGRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to JGRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs SBUY.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, SBUY.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while SBUY.L trades at £4,456.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBUY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SBUY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to SBUY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs FCSG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FCSG.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FCSG.L trades at £3,203.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FCSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and FCSG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs GLAB.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GLAB.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GLAB.L trades at £28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLAB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GLAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs RBE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, RBE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while RBE.L trades at £63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RBE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and RBE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs GGOV.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GGOV.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GGOV.L trades at £3,847.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGOV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGOV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and GGOV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs DH2O.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, DH2O.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while DH2O.L trades at £71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DH2O.L's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DH2O.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to DH2O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GAGU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GAGU.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GAGU.L trades at £55.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAGU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GAGU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GAGU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs HVPE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, HVPE.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while HVPE.L trades at £2,430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVPE.L's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HVPE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to HVPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GGRA.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GGRA.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GGRA.L trades at £41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRA.L's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GGRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs IDIN.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, IDIN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while IDIN.L trades at £34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIN.L's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDIN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to IDIN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs IGSU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, IGSU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while IGSU.L trades at £79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGSU.L's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to IGSU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PRWU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PRWU.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PRWU.L trades at £33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRWU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRWU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PRWU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JREM.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JREM.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JREM.L trades at £34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.L's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JREM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to JREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs MAGI.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, MAGI.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while MAGI.L trades at £35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGI.L's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MAGI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to MAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GGRP.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GGRP.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GGRP.L trades at £2,643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GGRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GGRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GLDV.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GLDV.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GLDV.L trades at £34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GLDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs IQSA.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, IQSA.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while IQSA.L trades at £83.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.L's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IQSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to IQSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JPCT.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JPCT.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JPCT.L trades at £44.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPCT.L's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPCT.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and JPCT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs V3AA.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, V3AA.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while V3AA.L trades at £6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AA.L's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to V3AA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs V3AL.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, V3AL.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while V3AL.L trades at £6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.L's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to V3AL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs V3AB.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, V3AB.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while V3AB.L trades at £5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to V3AB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to V3AB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs BBGI.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, BBGI.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while BBGI.L trades at £142.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGI.L's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BBGI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to BBGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs AGT.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, AGT.L has a market cap of 999.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while AGT.L trades at £235.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGT.L's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AGT.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to AGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GBDV.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GBDV.L has a market cap of 904.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GBDV.L trades at £25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBDV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GBDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GSCT.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GSCT.L has a market cap of 710.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GSCT.L trades at £159.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSCT.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSCT.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GSCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs EPRA.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, EPRA.L has a market cap of 693.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while EPRA.L trades at £5,309.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EPRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to EPRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs XGDD.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, XGDD.L has a market cap of 642.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while XGDD.L trades at £33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGDD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XGDD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to XGDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PCFT.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PCFT.L has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PCFT.L trades at £210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCFT.L's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PCFT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PCFT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs BCHN.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, BCHN.L has a market cap of 610.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while BCHN.L trades at £125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCHN.L's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to BCHN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GDIG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GDIG.L has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GDIG.L trades at £36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIG.L's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GDIG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GDIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs ROBO.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, ROBO.L has a market cap of 594.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while ROBO.L trades at £22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBO.L's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ROBO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to ROBO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs APAX.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, APAX.L has a market cap of 554.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while APAX.L trades at £114.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APAX.L's P/E ratio is 114.60. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to APAX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to APAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs QYLD.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, QYLD.L has a market cap of 506.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while QYLD.L trades at £15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLD.L's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to QYLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs QYLU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, QYLU.L has a market cap of 502.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while QYLU.L trades at £20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLU.L's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to QYLU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs LUXU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, LUXU.L has a market cap of 481M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while LUXU.L trades at £220.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LUXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to LUXU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PAVE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PAVE.L has a market cap of 479.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PAVE.L trades at £39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVE.L's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PAVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PCGH.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PCGH.L has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PCGH.L trades at £337.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGH.L's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PCGH.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PCGH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs LGGL.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, LGGL.L has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while LGGL.L trades at £21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGGL.L's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to LGGL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to LGGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs SKYU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, SKYU.L has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while SKYU.L trades at £49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYU.L's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SKYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to SKYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs SDIP.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, SDIP.L has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while SDIP.L trades at £6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to SDIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs SDIU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, SDIU.L has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while SDIU.L trades at £12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIU.L's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SDIU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to SDIU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs QYLP.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, QYLP.L has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while QYLP.L trades at £11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QYLP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to QYLP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to QYLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PAVG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PAVG.L has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PAVG.L trades at £28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PAVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PAVG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs INFR.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, INFR.L has a market cap of 339.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while INFR.L trades at £2,533.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INFR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to INFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GLRA.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GLRA.L has a market cap of 306.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GLRA.L trades at £20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRA.L's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLRA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GLRA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GLRE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GLRE.L has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GLRE.L trades at £34.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLRE.L's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GLRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs TRET.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, TRET.L has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while TRET.L trades at £42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TRET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to TRET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GSEO.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GSEO.L has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GSEO.L trades at £63.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSEO.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GSEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GBRE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GBRE.L has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GBRE.L trades at £25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBRE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBRE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GBRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GENE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GENE.L has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GENE.L trades at £1,637.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GENE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GENE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs EGL.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, EGL.L has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while EGL.L trades at £209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGL.L's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EGL.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to EGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs URNU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, URNU.L has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while URNU.L trades at £19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URNU.L's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to URNU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to URNU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JPLG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JPLG.L has a market cap of 192.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JPLG.L trades at £3,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPLG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPLG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to JPLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs MNP.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, MNP.L has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while MNP.L trades at £315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNP.L's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MNP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and MNP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs JARU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JARU.L has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JARU.L trades at £1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JARU.L's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JARU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and JARU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs COPX.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, COPX.L has a market cap of 162.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while COPX.L trades at £32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COPX.L's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to COPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to COPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs URND.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, URND.L has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while URND.L trades at £14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to URND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to URND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs FLXX.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FLXX.L has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FLXX.L trades at £27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FLXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to FLXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GOGB.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GOGB.L has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GOGB.L trades at £24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGB.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GOGB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs FGLS.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FGLS.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FGLS.L trades at £7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGLS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and FGLS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs FGLR.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FGLR.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FGLR.L trades at £9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGLR.L's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGLR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to FGLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs CESG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, CESG.L has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while CESG.L trades at £43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CESG.L's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to CESG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs 0P00018XAR.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, 0P00018XAR.L has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while 0P00018XAR.L trades at £222.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAR.L's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00018XAR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and 0P00018XAR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs 0P00018XAO.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, 0P00018XAO.L has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while 0P00018XAO.L trades at £194.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00018XAO.L's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00018XAO.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and 0P00018XAO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs BUG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, BUG.L has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while BUG.L trades at £16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUG.L's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BUG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to BUG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GEND.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GEND.L has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GEND.L trades at £12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEND.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GEND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GEND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GEDV.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GEDV.L has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GEDV.L trades at £20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEDV.L's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GEDV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GEDV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GCED.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GCED.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GCED.L trades at £15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCED.L's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GCED.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GCED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs FLXG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FLXG.L has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FLXG.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FLXG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to FLXG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs FRGE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, FRGE.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while FRGE.L trades at £39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGE.L's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FRGE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to FRGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs PMGR.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, PMGR.L has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while PMGR.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMGR.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PMGR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to PMGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs SKYP.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, SKYP.L has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while SKYP.L trades at £915.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SKYP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and SKYP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs KZG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, KZG.L has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while KZG.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KZG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to KZG.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to KZG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs AMAL.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, AMAL.L has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while AMAL.L trades at £9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAL.L's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AMAL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to AMAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs METR.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, METR.L has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while METR.L trades at £10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas METR.L's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to METR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and METR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs 0P000185T6.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, 0P000185T6.L has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while 0P000185T6.L trades at £167.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000185T6.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and 0P000185T6.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs HBKU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, HBKU.L has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while HBKU.L trades at £11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBKU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HBKU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and HBKU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs GNOM.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GNOM.L has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GNOM.L trades at £5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GNOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GNOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs DRVE.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, DRVE.L has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while DRVE.L trades at £11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVE.L's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DRVE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to DRVE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs GNOG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, GNOG.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while GNOG.L trades at £4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GNOG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to GNOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs HERU.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, HERU.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while HERU.L trades at £14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HERU.L's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HERU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to HERU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs DRVG.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, DRVG.L has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while DRVG.L trades at £8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DRVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L is less volatile compared to DRVG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P000185T5.L.
0P000185T5.L vs JETS.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, JETS.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while JETS.L trades at £6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JETS.L's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JETS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and JETS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs 0P000185T4.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, 0P000185T4.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while 0P000185T4.L trades at £245.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T4.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000185T4.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and 0P000185T4.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P000185T5.L vs 0P000185T3.L Comparison
0P000185T5.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P000185T5.L stands at 9.9M. In comparison, 0P000185T3.L has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P000185T5.L is priced at £196.95, while 0P000185T3.L trades at £267.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P000185T5.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000185T3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P000185T5.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000185T3.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P000185T5.L and 0P000185T3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).