Vanguard U.S. Investment Grade Credit Index Fund Institutional Plus EUR Hedged Acc
Vanguard U.S. Investment Grade Credit Index Fund Institutional Plus EUR Hedged Acc 0P00016QKO.F Peers
See (0P00016QKO.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00016QKO.F | €105.13 | +0.04% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €352.73 | +1.33% | 3T | 16.66 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €305.50 | +1.33% | 2.6T | 16.66 | €18.34 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €287.55 | +0.20% | 2.4T | 14.35 | €20.04 | N/A |
| FRCJ.DE | €23.45 | -0.38% | 830.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.03% |
| BBN1.F | €122.28 | +0.48% | 144.1B | 42.02 | €2.91 | +3.39% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +1.37% |
| ZPDW.DE | €72.21 | -0.12% | 113.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €23.37 | -1.06% | 106B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXR8.DE | €553.32 | -0.06% | 99.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P00016QKO.F vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €352.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and 0P00000MO4.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €305.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and 0P00000W6B.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €287.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and 0P00001QSE.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs FRCJ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, FRCJ.DE has a market cap of 830.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while FRCJ.DE trades at €23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRCJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to FRCJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to FRCJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs BBN1.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while BBN1.F trades at €122.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs BLQA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs ZPDW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while ZPDW.DE trades at €72.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs U1FB.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while U1FB.DE trades at €23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to U1FB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SXR8.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SXR8.DE trades at €553.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EUNL.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EUNL.DE trades at €99.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VUSA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VUSA.DE trades at €98.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VUAA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VUAA.DE trades at €99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SXRZ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SXRZ.DE trades at €232.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XJSE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XJSE.DE trades at €7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VGWL.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VGWL.DE trades at €126.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs E500.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while E500.DE trades at €45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs D500.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while D500.DE trades at €48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs P500.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while P500.DE trades at €1,028.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VWCE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VWCE.DE trades at €128.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VGWL.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs A4S.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and A4S.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,030.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SPPE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SPPE.DE trades at €14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IBC3.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs AW1Q.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while AW1Q.DE trades at €16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IS3N.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IS3N.DE trades at €32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SPY5.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SPY5.DE trades at €519.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IBC3.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs PPFB.SG Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while PPFB.SG trades at €56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XDWD.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XDWD.DE trades at €108.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XDWL.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XDWL.DE trades at €91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs TR1.DU Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while TR1.DU trades at €82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs LYP2.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while LYP2.DE trades at €291.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs LYPS.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while LYPS.DE trades at €53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs 6TVM.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 6TVM.DE trades at €53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IUSA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IUSA.DE trades at €51.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SXRV.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,074.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IUSZ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IUSQ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IUSQ.DE trades at €82.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs JUHE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while JUHE.DE trades at €47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EQQQ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EQQQ.DE trades at €458.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SPPW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SPPW.DE trades at €36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XDEE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XDEW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XDEW.DE trades at €84.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EUN5.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EUN5.DE trades at €121.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SGAS.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SGAS.DE trades at €10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs JREU.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while JREU.DE trades at €51.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs JRUD.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while JRUD.DE trades at €48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EUNK.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EUNK.DE trades at €86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DWS.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DWS.DE trades at €49.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs OM3L.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs QDVE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while QDVE.DE trades at €29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EGV2.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EGV2.DE trades at €101.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and IE00B4X9L533.SG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XD9E.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XD9E.DE trades at €119.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XD9U.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XD9U.DE trades at €152.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XD9D.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XD9D.DE trades at €20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs LYYA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while LYYA.DE trades at €338.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs STXH.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while STXH.DE trades at €141.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IQQY.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IQQY.DE trades at €34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XS5E.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XS5E.DE trades at €8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs D5BM.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while D5BM.DE trades at €103.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs LYP6.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while LYP6.DE trades at €262.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXS1.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXS1.DE trades at €199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXIC.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXIC.DE trades at €7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXW1.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXW1.DE trades at €54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXIE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXSA.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXSA.DE trades at €55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F and 0P00000SUJ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00016QKO.F vs VGVF.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VGVF.DE trades at €101.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VGVE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VGVE.DE trades at €98.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XWEH.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XWEH.DE trades at €41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IQQW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IQQW.DE trades at €72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DBXW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DBXW.DE trades at €106.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XZMU.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XZMU.DE trades at €56.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DBXE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EDMU.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs 2B7K.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs VGWD.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while VGWD.DE trades at €64.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs LCUW.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs EXIC.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €52.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs H4ZF.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while H4ZF.DE trades at €52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DECR.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DECR.DE trades at €47.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DBXD.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DBXD.DE trades at €225.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs TCC4.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while TCC4.DE trades at €223.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XMME.F Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs DBXU.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while DBXU.DE trades at €173.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IBCF.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IBCF.DE trades at €123.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XZW0.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XZW0.DE trades at €39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs AUM5.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while AUM5.DE trades at €102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs H1D5.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while H1D5.DE trades at €141.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SPP1.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SPP1.DE trades at €20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XIEE.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XIEE.DE trades at €78.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs AEMD.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, AEMD.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while AEMD.DE trades at €50.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to AEMD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to AEMD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs XMME.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while XMME.DE trades at €53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.
0P00016QKO.F vs SC0J.DE Comparison
0P00016QKO.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00016QKO.F stands at 0. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00016QKO.F is priced at €105.13, while SC0J.DE trades at €106.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00016QKO.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00016QKO.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00016QKO.F is less volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00016QKO.F.