Vanguard Global Bond Index Fund EUR Hedged Acc
Vanguard Global Bond Index Fund EUR Hedged Acc (0P00012I69.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P00012I69.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Bonds Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00012I69.F | €99.02 | +0.25% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBCC.DE | €4.34 | -0.87% | 20.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.88% |
| EUNA.DE | €4.90 | +0.36% | 11.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IUSU.DE | €112.08 | -0.57% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.53% |
| EUNU.DE | €3.81 | -0.22% | 10.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.21% |
| 0P0001LJIZ.F | €66.75 | +0.23% | 8.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SXRL.DE | €140.33 | +0.61% | 8.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OM3M.DE | €4.27 | -0.31% | 7.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.07% |
| IBCD.DE | €88.96 | -0.55% | 7B | N/A | N/A | +5.18% |
| IBB1.DE | €4.03 | +0.80% | 6.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
0P00012I69.F vs IBCC.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCC.DE has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCC.DE trades at €4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCC.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUNA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNA.DE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUNA.DE trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUNA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUNA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IUSU.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSU.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IUSU.DE trades at €112.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IUSU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IUSU.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUNU.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNU.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUNU.DE trades at €3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUNU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUNU.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 0P0001LJIZ.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P0001LJIZ.F has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 0P0001LJIZ.F trades at €66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LJIZ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001LJIZ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F and 0P0001LJIZ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001LJIZ.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SXRL.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRL.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SXRL.DE trades at €140.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SXRL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SXRL.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs OM3M.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, OM3M.DE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while OM3M.DE trades at €4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3M.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3M.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to OM3M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check OM3M.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCD.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCD.DE trades at €88.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBB1.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBB1.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBB1.DE trades at €4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBB1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBB1.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBB1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBB1.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 3SUD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 3SUD.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 3SUD.DE trades at €4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 3SUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to 3SUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check 3SUD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IUSM.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSM.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IUSM.DE trades at €150.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IUSM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IUSM.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUNH.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNH.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUNH.DE trades at €110.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUNH.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBC2.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC2.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBC2.DE trades at €3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC2.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBC2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBC2.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs OM3F.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, OM3F.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while OM3F.DE trades at €4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to OM3F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to OM3F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check OM3F.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SUA0.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SUA0.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SUA0.DE trades at €5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUA0.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SUA0.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SUA0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SUA0.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VECA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VECA.DE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VECA.DE trades at €52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VECA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VECA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VECA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VECP.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VECP.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VECP.DE trades at €48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VECP.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VECP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VECP.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUNX.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNX.DE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUNX.DE trades at €81.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUNX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUNX.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IE1A.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE1A.DE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IE1A.DE trades at €5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE1A.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE1A.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IE1A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IE1A.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SXRR.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRR.DE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SXRR.DE trades at €4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SXRR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SXRR.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VAGF.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VAGF.DE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VAGF.DE trades at €23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VAGF.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VAGF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VAGF.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VAGE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VAGE.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VAGE.DE trades at €21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VAGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VAGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VAGE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPFU.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPFU.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPFU.DE trades at €30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPFU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPFU.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPFB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPFB.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPFB.DE trades at €28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPFB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPFB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPFE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPFE.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPFE.DE trades at €26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPFE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPFE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPFV.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPFV.DE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPFV.DE trades at €31.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPFV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPFV.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IUSP.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IUSP.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IUSP.DE trades at €38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IUSP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IUSP.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SXRM.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SXRM.DE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SXRM.DE trades at €150.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SXRM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SXRM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SXRM.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs D5BG.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, D5BG.DE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while D5BG.DE trades at €161.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to D5BG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to D5BG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check D5BG.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs QDVY.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, QDVY.DE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while QDVY.DE trades at €4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to QDVY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to QDVY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check QDVY.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VDCE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VDCE.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VDCE.DE trades at €54.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VDCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VDCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VDCE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VUCE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUCE.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VUCE.DE trades at €51.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VUCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VUCE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VUCP.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VUCP.DE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VUCP.DE trades at €41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUCP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VUCP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VUCP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VUCP.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IE3E.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IE3E.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IE3E.DE trades at €5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE3E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IE3E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IE3E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IE3E.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IS0X.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS0X.DE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IS0X.DE trades at €78.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0X.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS0X.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IS0X.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IS0X.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XEC1.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XEC1.F has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XEC1.F trades at €7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEC1.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XEC1.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XEC1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XEC1.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs JBEM.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, JBEM.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while JBEM.DE trades at €9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to JBEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to JBEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check JBEM.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs BBLL.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, BBLL.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while BBLL.DE trades at €100.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBLL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to BBLL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to BBLL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check BBLL.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs CB3G.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, CB3G.DE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while CB3G.DE trades at €220.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to CB3G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to CB3G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check CB3G.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SLMG.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SLMG.DE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SLMG.DE trades at €4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SLMG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SLMG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SLMG.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs ASRI.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, ASRI.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while ASRI.DE trades at €10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ASRI.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to ASRI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check ASRI.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs DBXN.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXN.DE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while DBXN.DE trades at €221.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to DBXN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check DBXN.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs X03F.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, X03F.DE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while X03F.DE trades at €173.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas X03F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to X03F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to X03F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check X03F.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUN3.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUN3.DE trades at €78.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUN3.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SNAZ.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SNAZ.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SNAZ.DE trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SNAZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SNAZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SNAZ.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs HYLE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, HYLE.DE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while HYLE.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to HYLE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to HYLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check HYLE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 36BA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 36BA.DE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 36BA.DE trades at €4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 36BA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 36BA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to 36BA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check 36BA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VGTY.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGTY.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VGTY.DE trades at €18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGTY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGTY.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VGTY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VGTY.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XB4F.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XB4F.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XB4F.DE trades at €144.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XB4F.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XB4F.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XB4F.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XB4F.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCN.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCN.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCN.DE trades at €162.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCN.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs ASR3.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, ASR3.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while ASR3.DE trades at €9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASR3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ASR3.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F and ASR3.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASR3.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCS.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCS.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCS.DE trades at €125.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCS.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs DBZB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBZB.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while DBZB.DE trades at €209.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBZB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBZB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to DBZB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check DBZB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs UEEF.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, UEEF.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while UEEF.DE trades at €5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEEF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to UEEF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to UEEF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check UEEF.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IS0Q.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS0Q.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IS0Q.DE trades at €78.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS0Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IS0Q.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IS0Q.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBC9.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBC9.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBC9.DE trades at €79.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC9.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBC9.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBC9.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBC9.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 5UOA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 5UOA.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 5UOA.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5UOA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 5UOA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to 5UOA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check 5UOA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCA.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCA.DE trades at €142.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs LYQ2.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYQ2.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while LYQ2.DE trades at €126.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYQ2.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to LYQ2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check LYQ2.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XHYG.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XHYG.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XHYG.DE trades at €16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XHYG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XHYG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XHYG.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XHYA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XHYA.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XHYA.DE trades at €23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHYA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XHYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XHYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XHYA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUN4.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUN4.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUN4.DE trades at €108.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUN4.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUN4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUN4.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SECA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SECA.DE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SECA.DE trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SECA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SECA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SECA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs CBUJ.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, CBUJ.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while CBUJ.DE trades at €5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBUJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to CBUJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check CBUJ.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IPAB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IPAB.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IPAB.DE trades at €5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IPAB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IPAB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IPAB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPF2.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPF2.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPF2.DE trades at €35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPF2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPF2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPF2.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPF1.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPF1.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPF1.DE trades at €42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPF1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPF1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPF1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPF1.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs MDBU.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, MDBU.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while MDBU.DE trades at €9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to MDBU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to MDBU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check MDBU.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs MDBA.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, MDBA.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while MDBA.DE trades at €10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to MDBA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to MDBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check MDBA.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SPFD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SPFD.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SPFD.DE trades at €27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SPFD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SPFD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SPFD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs DBXP.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, DBXP.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while DBXP.DE trades at €172.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXP.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to DBXP.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to DBXP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check DBXP.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IPAB.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IPAB.F has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IPAB.F trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAB.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IPAB.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IPAB.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IPAB.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs LYXD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYXD.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while LYXD.DE trades at €168.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYXD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to LYXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check LYXD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs ICGB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, ICGB.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while ICGB.DE trades at €4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICGB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ICGB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to ICGB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check ICGB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EGV5.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EGV5.F has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EGV5.F trades at €125.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGV5.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EGV5.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EGV5.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EGV5.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IS3K.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS3K.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IS3K.DE trades at €75.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IS3K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IS3K.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs MTDD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, MTDD.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while MTDD.DE trades at €156.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTDD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to MTDD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to MTDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check MTDD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SYBB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SYBB.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SYBB.DE trades at €56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SYBB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SYBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SYBB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCI.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCI.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCI.DE trades at €230.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCI.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs ZPRC.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, ZPRC.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while ZPRC.DE trades at €46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPRC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to ZPRC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check ZPRC.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 0P000019FE.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P000019FE.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 0P000019FE.F trades at €137.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000019FE.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P000019FE.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F and 0P000019FE.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P000019FE.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 0P0000J59O.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P0000J59O.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 0P0000J59O.F trades at €157.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000J59O.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0000J59O.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F and 0P0000J59O.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0000J59O.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs 0P00012I68.F Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00012I68.F has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while 0P00012I68.F trades at €129.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I68.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00012I68.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F and 0P00012I68.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P00012I68.F's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs SYBD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, SYBD.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while SYBD.DE trades at €30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYBD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to SYBD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to SYBD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check SYBD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IS3V.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS3V.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IS3V.DE trades at €4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3V.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS3V.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IS3V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IS3V.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XY4P.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XY4P.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XY4P.DE trades at €179.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XY4P.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XY4P.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XY4P.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XY4P.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IS0M.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IS0M.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IS0M.DE trades at €152.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS0M.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IS0M.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IS0M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IS0M.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IBCM.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IBCM.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IBCM.DE trades at €188.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IBCM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IBCM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IBCM.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs VGEM.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, VGEM.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while VGEM.DE trades at €37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to VGEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to VGEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check VGEM.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XYPD.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XYPD.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XYPD.DE trades at €147.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYPD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XYPD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XYPD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XYPD.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XDGE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDGE.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XDGE.DE trades at €10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XDGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XDGE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs XDGU.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, XDGU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while XDGU.DE trades at €11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to XDGU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check XDGU.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs IU0E.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, IU0E.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while IU0E.DE trades at €5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IU0E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to IU0E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to IU0E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check IU0E.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs TRDE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, TRDE.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while TRDE.DE trades at €31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TRDE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to TRDE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check TRDE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs TRDX.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, TRDX.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while TRDX.DE trades at €31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRDX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to TRDX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to TRDX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check TRDX.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs V3GE.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, V3GE.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while V3GE.DE trades at €4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3GE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to V3GE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to V3GE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check V3GE.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs LYQ6.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, LYQ6.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while LYQ6.DE trades at €199.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYQ6.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to LYQ6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to LYQ6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check LYQ6.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs NADB.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, NADB.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while NADB.DE trades at €141.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to NADB.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to NADB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check NADB.DE's competition here
0P00012I69.F vs EUNR.DE Comparison August 2025
0P00012I69.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00012I69.F stands at 0. In comparison, EUNR.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00012I69.F is priced at €99.02, while EUNR.DE trades at €109.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00012I69.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00012I69.F's ROE is N/A, compared to EUNR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00012I69.F is less volatile compared to EUNR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00012I69.F.Check EUNR.DE's competition here