Vanguard Global Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus EUR Acc
Vanguard Global Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus EUR Acc 0P00011OE2.F Peers
See (0P00011OE2.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00011OE2.F | €264.82 | -0.07% | 260.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JREG.DE | €46.69 | +0.40% | 8.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IQQQ.DE | €63.10 | +0.43% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.18% |
| EXI2.DE | €84.85 | +0.12% | 2B | 26.99 | €3.14 | +0.47% |
| IQQH.DE | €6.48 | +1.11% | 2B | N/A | N/A | +1.37% |
| 10AM.DE | €45.66 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.93% |
| IQQI.DE | €30.07 | +0.43% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.36% |
| IUSL.DE | €69.97 | +0.68% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WTEM.DE | €36.81 | +0.59% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JREM.DE | €29.92 | +0.20% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P00011OE2.F vs JREG.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, JREG.DE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while JREG.DE trades at €46.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JREG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JREG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IQQQ.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IQQQ.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IQQQ.DE trades at €63.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs EXI2.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, EXI2.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while EXI2.DE trades at €84.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXI2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXI2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to EXI2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IQQH.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IQQH.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IQQH.DE trades at €6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 10AM.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 10AM.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 10AM.DE trades at €45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 10AM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 10AM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IQQI.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IQQI.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IQQI.DE trades at €30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IUSL.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IUSL.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IUSL.DE trades at €69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IUSL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IUSL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs WTEM.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, WTEM.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while WTEM.DE trades at €36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WTEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs JREM.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, JREM.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while JREM.DE trades at €29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JREM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JREM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs PR1W.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, PR1W.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while PR1W.DE trades at €36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1W.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PR1W.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PR1W.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs PRAW.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, PRAW.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while PRAW.DE trades at €31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRAW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PRAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs ZPRI.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, ZPRI.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while ZPRI.DE trades at €31.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZPRI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZPRI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs ZPRG.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, ZPRG.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while ZPRG.DE trades at €30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZPRG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZPRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IQSE.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IQSE.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IQSE.DE trades at €78.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs IQSA.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, IQSA.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while IQSA.DE trades at €73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 10AJ.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 10AJ.DE has a market cap of 823.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 10AJ.DE trades at €51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AJ.DE's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 10AJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 10AJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs SEC0.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, SEC0.F has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while SEC0.F trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEC0.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEC0.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to SEC0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs V3AL.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, V3AL.F has a market cap of 813.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while V3AL.F trades at €4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to V3AL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to V3AL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs DXSB.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, DXSB.DE has a market cap of 705.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while DXSB.DE trades at €29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXSB.DE's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DXSB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DXSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs WMIN.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, WMIN.DE has a market cap of 617.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while WMIN.DE trades at €31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMIN.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WMIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs ETLQ.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, ETLQ.DE has a market cap of 376.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while ETLQ.DE trades at €19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETLQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETLQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ETLQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs GGUE.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, GGUE.DE has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while GGUE.DE trades at €23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GGUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to GGUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs DX2E.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, DX2E.DE has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while DX2E.DE trades at €61.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX2E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DX2E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DX2E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs WELJ.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, WELJ.DE has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while WELJ.DE trades at €12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELJ.DE's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WELJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs UDIV.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, UDIV.F has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while UDIV.F trades at €8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIV.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UDIV.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to UDIV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs XU61.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, XU61.DE has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while XU61.DE trades at €81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XU61.DE's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XU61.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to XU61.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs JPGL.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, JPGL.DE has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while JPGL.DE trades at €36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPGL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPGL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JPGL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs WELN.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, WELN.DE has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while WELN.DE trades at €10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELN.DE's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WELN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs PR1G.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, PR1G.DE has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while PR1G.DE trades at €16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PR1G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PR1G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs PRAG.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, PRAG.DE has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while PRAG.DE trades at €17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRAG.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PRAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs FLXX.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, FLXX.DE has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while FLXX.DE trades at €32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLXX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to FLXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs ZZRG.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, ZZRG.F has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while ZZRG.F trades at €24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZRG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZZRG.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZZRG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs VVGM.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, VVGM.F has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while VVGM.F trades at €23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVGM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVGM.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and VVGM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs BBCK.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, BBCK.DE has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while BBCK.DE trades at €53.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBCK.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBCK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to BBCK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs SLVR.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, SLVR.F has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while SLVR.F trades at €10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLVR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and SLVR.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs VOOM.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, VOOM.DE has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while VOOM.DE trades at €15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOOM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOOM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to VOOM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs SM8T.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, SM8T.DE has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while SM8T.DE trades at €670.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SM8T.DE's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SM8T.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to SM8T.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs FLXG.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, FLXG.DE has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while FLXG.DE trades at €34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLXG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to FLXG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs G1CE.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, G1CE.DE has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while G1CE.DE trades at €14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G1CE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to G1CE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to G1CE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P0001CXIY.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P0001CXIY.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P0001CXIY.F trades at €145.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001CXIY.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0001CXIY.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0001CXIY.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P00015OFP.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P00015OFP.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P00015OFP.F trades at €50.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00015OFP.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00015OFP.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00015OFP.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs DNRA.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, DNRA.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while DNRA.DE trades at €88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNRA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DNRA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P0000XR9M.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P0000XR9M.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P0000XR9M.F trades at €324.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000XR9M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000XR9M.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000XR9M.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs LYPB.DE Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, LYPB.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while LYPB.DE trades at €396.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPB.DE's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYPB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to LYPB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P0000VHNS.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P0000VHNS.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P0000VHNS.F trades at €18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000VHNS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000VHNS.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000VHNS.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 4UBR.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 4UBR.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 4UBR.F trades at €10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4UBR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 4UBR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 4UBR.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P00000WLG.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P00000WLG.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P00000WLG.F trades at €49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000WLG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00000WLG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00000WLG.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P00012I66.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P00012I66.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P00012I66.F trades at €337.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I66.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00012I66.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00012I66.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P0000PTZO.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P0000PTZO.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P0000PTZO.F trades at €336.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000PTZO.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000PTZO.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000PTZO.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P00011HBM.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P00011HBM.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P00011HBM.F trades at €353.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011HBM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00011HBM.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00011HBM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P0000IRFW.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P0000IRFW.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P0000IRFW.F trades at €610.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000IRFW.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000IRFW.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000IRFW.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P000015J7.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P000015J7.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P000015J7.F trades at €36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000015J7.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P000015J7.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P000015J7.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs ASRS.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, ASRS.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while ASRS.F trades at €9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASRS.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and ASRS.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00011OE2.F vs 0P00000RQC.F Comparison
0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 260.6B. In comparison, 0P00000RQC.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at €264.82, while 0P00000RQC.F trades at €49.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000RQC.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00000RQC.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00000RQC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).