Vanguard Global Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Plus EUR Acc

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, JREG.DE has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while JREG.DE trades at $44.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JREG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JREG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IQQQ.DE has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IQQQ.DE trades at $62.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, EXI2.DE has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while EXI2.DE trades at $79.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXI2.DE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXI2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to EXI2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 10AM.DE has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 10AM.DE trades at $45.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 10AM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 10AM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IQQH.DE has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IQQH.DE trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IQQI.DE has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IQQI.DE trades at $30.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQQI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQQI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IUSL.DE has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IUSL.DE trades at $67.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IUSL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IUSL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, PR1W.DE has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while PR1W.DE trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1W.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PR1W.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PR1W.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, PRAW.DE has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while PRAW.DE trades at $31.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRAW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PRAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, JREM.DE has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while JREM.DE trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JREM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JREM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, ZPRI.DE has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while ZPRI.DE trades at $30.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRI.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZPRI.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZPRI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, ZPRG.DE has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while ZPRG.DE trades at $29.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPRG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZPRG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZPRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, SEC0.F has a market cap of 820.08M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while SEC0.F trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEC0.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEC0.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to SEC0.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, V3AL.F has a market cap of 813.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while V3AL.F trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V3AL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to V3AL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to V3AL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 10AJ.DE has a market cap of 793.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 10AJ.DE trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AJ.DE's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 10AJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 10AJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IQSA.DE has a market cap of 747.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IQSA.DE trades at $70.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, DXSB.DE has a market cap of 705.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while DXSB.DE trades at $29.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXSB.DE's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DXSB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DXSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, WTEM.DE has a market cap of 660.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while WTEM.DE trades at $35.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTEM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTEM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WTEM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, WMIN.DE has a market cap of 615.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while WMIN.DE trades at $30.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMIN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMIN.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WMIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, ETLQ.DE has a market cap of 317.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while ETLQ.DE trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETLQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETLQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ETLQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, DX2E.DE has a market cap of 282.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while DX2E.DE trades at $59.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX2E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DX2E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DX2E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, WELN.DE has a market cap of 267.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while WELN.DE trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WELN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, WELJ.DE has a market cap of 250.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while WELJ.DE trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELJ.DE's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WELJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to WELJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, UDIV.F has a market cap of 244.72M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while UDIV.F trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIV.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UDIV.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to UDIV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, XU61.DE has a market cap of 215.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while XU61.DE trades at $79.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XU61.DE's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XU61.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to XU61.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, JPGL.DE has a market cap of 185.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while JPGL.DE trades at $36.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPGL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JPGL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to JPGL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, IQSE.DE has a market cap of 167.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while IQSE.DE trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to IQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, PRAG.DE has a market cap of 126.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while PRAG.DE trades at $17.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRAG.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PRAG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, PR1G.DE has a market cap of 126.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while PR1G.DE trades at $17.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PR1G.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PR1G.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to PR1G.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, FLXX.DE has a market cap of 115.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while FLXX.DE trades at $32.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXX.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLXX.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to FLXX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, GGUE.DE has a market cap of 95.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while GGUE.DE trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GGUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to GGUE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, ZZRG.F has a market cap of 85.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while ZZRG.F trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZRG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZZRG.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to ZZRG.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, VVGM.F has a market cap of 74.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while VVGM.F trades at $23.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVGM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVGM.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and VVGM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, BBCK.DE has a market cap of 68.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while BBCK.DE trades at $50.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBCK.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBCK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to BBCK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, SLVR.F has a market cap of 66.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while SLVR.F trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLVR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and SLVR.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, VOOM.DE has a market cap of 46.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while VOOM.DE trades at $14.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOOM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOOM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to VOOM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, SM8T.DE has a market cap of 37.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while SM8T.DE trades at $670.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SM8T.DE's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SM8T.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to SM8T.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, FLXG.DE has a market cap of 20.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while FLXG.DE trades at $34.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLXG.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLXG.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to FLXG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, G1CE.DE has a market cap of 17.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while G1CE.DE trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G1CE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to G1CE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to G1CE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P00000RQC.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P00000RQC.F trades at $46.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000RQC.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00000RQC.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00000RQC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, DNRA.DE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while DNRA.DE trades at $88.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNRA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DNRA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to DNRA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 4UBR.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 4UBR.F trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4UBR.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 4UBR.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to 4UBR.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P000015J7.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P000015J7.F trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P000015J7.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P000015J7.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P000015J7.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P0000IRFW.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P0000IRFW.F trades at $581.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000IRFW.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000IRFW.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000IRFW.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P0000VHNS.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P0000VHNS.F trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000VHNS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000VHNS.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000VHNS.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P00011HBM.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P00011HBM.F trades at $336.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00011HBM.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00011HBM.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00011HBM.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P00000WLG.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P00000WLG.F trades at $47.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000WLG.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00000WLG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00000WLG.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P00012I66.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P00012I66.F trades at $322.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00012I66.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00012I66.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00012I66.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P0001CXIY.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P0001CXIY.F trades at $139.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001CXIY.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0001CXIY.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0001CXIY.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P0000XR9M.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P0000XR9M.F trades at $310.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000XR9M.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000XR9M.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000XR9M.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P00015OFP.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P00015OFP.F trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00015OFP.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P00015OFP.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P00015OFP.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, ASRS.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while ASRS.F trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASRS.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASRS.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and ASRS.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, 0P0000PTZO.F comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while 0P0000PTZO.F trades at $331.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0000PTZO.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0P0000PTZO.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F and 0P0000PTZO.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0P00011OE2.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P00011OE2.F stands at 248.78B. In comparison, LYPB.DE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00011OE2.F is priced at $252.77, while LYPB.DE trades at $396.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P00011OE2.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYPB.DE's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, 0P00011OE2.F's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYPB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00011OE2.F is less volatile compared to LYPB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00011OE2.F.