Vanguard LifeStrategy 100% Equity Fund A Acc

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, EMIM.L has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while EMIM.L trades at £3,055.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EMIM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EMIM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to EMIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check EMIM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IUSA.L has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IUSA.L trades at £4,771.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IUSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IUSA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SSAC.L has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SSAC.L trades at £7,550.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SSAC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SSAC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SSAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SSAC.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SMEA.L has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SMEA.L trades at £7,678.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SMEA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SMEA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SMEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SMEA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IITU.L has a market cap of 988.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IITU.L trades at £2,845.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IITU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IITU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IITU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IITU.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XESC.L has a market cap of 862.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XESC.L trades at £8,262.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XESC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XESC.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UB0D.L has a market cap of 848.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UB0D.L trades at £2,399.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UB0D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB0D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UB0D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UB0D.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XESX.L has a market cap of 847.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XESX.L trades at £4,926.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XESX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XESX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XESX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XESX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, MEUD.L has a market cap of 806.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while MEUD.L trades at £23,335.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MEUD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MEUD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to MEUD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check MEUD.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CNAL.L has a market cap of 733.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CNAL.L trades at £12,985.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CNAL.L's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CNAL.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CNAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CNAL.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWRD.L has a market cap of 609.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWRD.L trades at £6,622.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWRD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWRD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWRD.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XMMS.L has a market cap of 586.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XMMS.L trades at £5,092.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XMMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XMMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XMMS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XDAX.L has a market cap of 562.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XDAX.L trades at £19,792.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XDAX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDAX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XDAX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XDAX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XMUS.L has a market cap of 529.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XMUS.L trades at £14,253.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XMUS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XMUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XMUS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, MXWS.L has a market cap of 522.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while MXWS.L trades at £9,759.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MXWS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MXWS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to MXWS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check MXWS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, PHGP.L has a market cap of 507.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while PHGP.L trades at £23,235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PHGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to PHGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check PHGP.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XMEU.L has a market cap of 501.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XMEU.L trades at £8,773.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XMEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XMEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XMEU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XMEU.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, GLDA.L has a market cap of 494.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while GLDA.L trades at £9,892.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GLDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GLDA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to GLDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check GLDA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CS51.L has a market cap of 468.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CS51.L trades at £18,083.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CS51.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CS51.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CS51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CS51.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UC44.L has a market cap of 468.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UC44.L trades at £13,266.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UC44.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC44.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UC44.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UC44.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UB32.L has a market cap of 460B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UB32.L trades at £9,395.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UB32.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB32.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UB32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UB32.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IEEM.L has a market cap of 416.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IEEM.L trades at £3,722.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IEEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IEEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IEEM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, EUE.L has a market cap of 395B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while EUE.L trades at £4,831.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EUE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EUE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to EUE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check EUE.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SEMA.L has a market cap of 377.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SEMA.L trades at £3,511.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SEMA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SEMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SEMA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CACX.L has a market cap of 355.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CACX.L trades at £6,970.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CACX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CACX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CACX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CACX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XSX6.L has a market cap of 340.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XSX6.L trades at £12,364.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XSX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XSX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XSX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XSX6.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWFQ.L has a market cap of 318B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWFQ.L trades at £5,581.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWFQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWFQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWFQ.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, GBSS.L has a market cap of 301.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while GBSS.L trades at £22,861.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GBSS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to GBSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check GBSS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CEA1.L has a market cap of 284.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CEA1.L trades at £16,022.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CEA1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEA1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CEA1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CEA1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWFV.L has a market cap of 282.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWFV.L trades at £3,959.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWFV.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SGBX.L has a market cap of 276.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SGBX.L trades at £23,872.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SGBX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SGBX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SGBX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SGBX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, RBTX.L has a market cap of 261.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while RBTX.L trades at £1,130.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas RBTX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RBTX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to RBTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check RBTX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CPJ1.L has a market cap of 249.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CPJ1.L trades at £16,256.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CPJ1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CPJ1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CPJ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CPJ1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SUES.L has a market cap of 247.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SUES.L trades at £648.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SUES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SUES.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SUES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SUES.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, ISPY.L has a market cap of 245.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while ISPY.L trades at £2,291.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ISPY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISPY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to ISPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check ISPY.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, JRDE.L has a market cap of 244.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while JRDE.L trades at £3,775.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas JRDE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L and JRDE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JRDE.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, JERE.L has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while JERE.L trades at £4,068.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas JERE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JERE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to JERE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check JERE.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWFM.L has a market cap of 234B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWFM.L trades at £6,871.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWFM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWFM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWFM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, PHSP.L has a market cap of 224.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while PHSP.L trades at £2,633.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PHSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to PHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check PHSP.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XXSC.L has a market cap of 223B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XXSC.L trades at £5,797.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XXSC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XXSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XXSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XXSC.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, HMEF.L has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while HMEF.L trades at £945.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HMEF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMEF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to HMEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check HMEF.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SPGP.L has a market cap of 202.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SPGP.L trades at £2,045.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SPGP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SPGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SPGP.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XDEV.L has a market cap of 190.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XDEV.L trades at £4,073.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XDEV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XDEV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XDEV.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UIFS.L has a market cap of 189.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UIFS.L trades at £1,156.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UIFS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UIFS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UIFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UIFS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SOYU.L has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SOYU.L trades at £313.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SOYU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SOYU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L and SOYU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOYU.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CEUR.L has a market cap of 178.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CEUR.L trades at £32,582.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CEUR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CEUR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CEUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CEUR.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IEFV.L has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IEFV.L trades at £954.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IEFV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IEFV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IEFV.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XDEQ.L has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XDEQ.L trades at £5,682.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XDEQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XDEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XDEQ.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CU1.L has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CU1.L trades at £49,285.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CU1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CU1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CU1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CU1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IUQF.L has a market cap of 158.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IUQF.L trades at £1,169.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IUQF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUQF.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IUQF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IUQF.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, WATL.L has a market cap of 152.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while WATL.L trades at £6,128.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas WATL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WATL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to WATL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check WATL.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, PRIR.L has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while PRIR.L trades at £1,498.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PRIR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to PRIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check PRIR.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UC79.L has a market cap of 151.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UC79.L trades at £1,201.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UC79.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UC79.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UC79.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UC79.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, GBSP.L has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while GBSP.L trades at £1,736.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GBSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GBSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to GBSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check GBSP.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, ISP6.L has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while ISP6.L trades at £7,096.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas ISP6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ISP6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to ISP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check ISP6.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XCX6.L has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XCX6.L trades at £1,493.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XCX6.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XCX6.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XCX6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XCX6.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CB5.L has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CB5.L trades at £4,520.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CB5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CB5.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CB5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CB5.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CUS1.L has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CUS1.L trades at £41,690.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CUS1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CUS1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CUS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CUS1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CG1.L has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CG1.L trades at £37,480.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CG1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CG1.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CG1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CG1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IPRP.L has a market cap of 139.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IPRP.L trades at £2,742.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IPRP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IPRP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IPRP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IPRP.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, GILS.L has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while GILS.L trades at £10,109.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GILS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GILS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to GILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check GILS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CSPX.L has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CSPX.L trades at £691.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CSPX.L's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSPX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CSPX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XZEU.L has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XZEU.L trades at £2,874.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XZEU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XZEU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L and XZEU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XZEU.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, GSPX.L has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while GSPX.L trades at £10.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas GSPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GSPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to GSPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check GSPX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SP5G.L has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SP5G.L trades at £219.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SP5G.L's P/E ratio is 68.41. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SP5G.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SP5G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SP5G.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, H50E.L has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while H50E.L trades at £4,985.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas H50E.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to H50E.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to H50E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check H50E.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, INFL.L has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while INFL.L trades at £10,076.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas INFL.L's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INFL.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to INFL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check INFL.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IGSG.L has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IGSG.L trades at £6,215.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IGSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IGSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IGSG.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XDEM.L has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XDEM.L trades at £5,781.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XDEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XDEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XDEM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, EQSG.L has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while EQSG.L trades at £5,434.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EQSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EQSG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to EQSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check EQSG.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, 0GWB.IL has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while 0GWB.IL trades at £488.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas 0GWB.IL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0GWB.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to 0GWB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check 0GWB.IL's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWDA.L has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWDA.L trades at £123.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWDA.L's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWDA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IWDG.L has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IWDG.L trades at £1,062.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IWDG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IWDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IWDG.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IJPN.L has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IJPN.L trades at £1,506.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IJPN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPN.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IJPN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IJPN.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XRSG.L has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XRSG.L trades at £25,699.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XRSG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XRSG.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XRSG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XRSG.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, JRDM.L has a market cap of 115.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while JRDM.L trades at £2,503.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas JRDM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JRDM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to JRDM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check JRDM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IEUX.L has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IEUX.L trades at £4,171.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IEUX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IEUX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IEUX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IEUX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, DAXX.L has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while DAXX.L trades at £19,302.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas DAXX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DAXX.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to DAXX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check DAXX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, PRIC.L has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while PRIC.L trades at £1,659.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PRIC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to PRIC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check PRIC.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XLKQ.L has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XLKQ.L trades at £58,475.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XLKQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XLKQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XLKQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XLKQ.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, COMM.L has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while COMM.L trades at £538.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas COMM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to COMM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to COMM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check COMM.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CSCA.L has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CSCA.L trades at £18,205.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CSCA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSCA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CSCA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CSCA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, WQDS.L has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while WQDS.L trades at £576.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas WQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to WQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check WQDS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, PRIJ.L has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while PRIJ.L trades at £2,632.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas PRIJ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PRIJ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to PRIJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check PRIJ.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IUKD.L has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IUKD.L trades at £878.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IUKD.L's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IUKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IUKD.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, TRXS.L has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while TRXS.L trades at £3,415.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas TRXS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TRXS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to TRXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check TRXS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, RIEG.L has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while RIEG.L trades at £1,500.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas RIEG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RIEG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to RIEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check RIEG.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, INAA.L has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while INAA.L trades at £8,877.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas INAA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to INAA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to INAA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check INAA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, MTIX.L has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while MTIX.L trades at £14,392.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas MTIX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MTIX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to MTIX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check MTIX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IGUS.L has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IGUS.L trades at £14,805.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IGUS.L's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGUS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IGUS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IGUS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CRPX.L has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CRPX.L trades at £13,336.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CRPX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CRPX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CRPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CRPX.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, CSP1.L has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while CSP1.L trades at £51,098.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas CSP1.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CSP1.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to CSP1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check CSP1.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, EQDS.L has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while EQDS.L trades at £556.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas EQDS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EQDS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to EQDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check EQDS.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IDVY.L has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IDVY.L trades at £2,035.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IDVY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IDVY.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IDVY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IDVY.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, HMCH.L has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while HMCH.L trades at £618.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas HMCH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HMCH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to HMCH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check HMCH.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, UB45.L has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while UB45.L trades at £6,356.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas UB45.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UB45.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to UB45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check UB45.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, SWDA.L has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while SWDA.L trades at £9,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas SWDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to SWDA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check SWDA.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, XDN0.L has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while XDN0.L trades at £4,135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas XDN0.L's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to XDN0.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to XDN0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check XDN0.L's competition here

0P0000TKZO.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0P0000TKZO.L stands at 97.6M. In comparison, IMV.L has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P0000TKZO.L is priced at £406.28, while IMV.L trades at £5,877.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0P0000TKZO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.21, whereas IMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P0000TKZO.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IMV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P0000TKZO.L is less volatile compared to IMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P0000TKZO.L.Check IMV.L's competition here