Schroder ISF Glb Clmt Chg Eq A Acc SGD
Schroder ISF Glb Clmt Chg Eq A Acc SGD (0P00009DRS.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0P00009DRS.SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P00009DRS.SI | SGD 23.12 | +0.90% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
0P0001LV1C.SI | SGD 7.83 | +1.95% | 1.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
0P0001AF7U.SI | SGD 40.46 | +0.37% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
0P0001LKN0.SI | SGD 134.41 | +1.20% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
0P0001DIJX.SI | SGD 3.06 | +0.13% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P00009DRS.SI vs 0P0001LV1C.SI Comparison August 2025
0P00009DRS.SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00009DRS.SI stands at 0. In comparison, 0P0001LV1C.SI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00009DRS.SI is priced at SGD 23.12, while 0P0001LV1C.SI trades at SGD 7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00009DRS.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001LV1C.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00009DRS.SI's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001LV1C.SI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00009DRS.SI and 0P0001LV1C.SI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001LV1C.SI's competition here