IFSL Wise Multi-Asset Income B Inc
IFSL Wise Multi-Asset Income B Inc 0P00002ANR.L Peers
See (0P00002ANR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0P00002ANR.L | £1.26 | +0.14% | 405.7K | 0.14 | £0.09 | N/A |
| UINC.L | £2,379.00 | +0.13% | 32.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.24% |
| DEM.L | £1,168.25 | +0.42% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.86% |
| DEMS.L | £2,137.50 | +0.36% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EEI.L | £1,133.40 | -0.42% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +4.64% |
| EEIP.L | £1,802.30 | -0.52% | 4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JGGI.L | £539.00 | +0.19% | 2.8B | 5.50 | £0.98 | +5.09% |
| GINC.L | £3,792.50 | +0.84% | 2.5B | N/A | N/A | +3.63% |
| FUSA.L | £12.87 | -0.06% | 2B | 23.13 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSP.L | £10.20 | N/A | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0P00002ANR.L vs UINC.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while UINC.L trades at £2,379.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DEM.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DEM.L trades at £1,168.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DEMS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DEMS.L trades at £2,137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs EEI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while EEI.L trades at £1,133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs EEIP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while EEIP.L trades at £1,802.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JGGI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JGGI.L trades at £539.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs GINC.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while GINC.L trades at £3,792.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FUSA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FUSA.L trades at £12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FUSP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FUSP.L trades at £10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FUSD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FUSD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FUSD.L trades at £10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FUSD.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FUSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FGT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FGT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FGT.L trades at £909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FGT.L's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FGT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SEQI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SEQI.L trades at £77.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FUQA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FUQA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FUQA.L trades at £955.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FUQA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FUQA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FUQA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FUSI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FUSI.L trades at £798.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FUSI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs WUKD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and WUKD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs JSET.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 941.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JSET.L trades at £90.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MUT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MUT.L trades at £852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FGQP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 832.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FGQP.L trades at £8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs TFIF.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 827.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while TFIF.L trades at £110.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JPST.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 644.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JPST.L trades at £101.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JPSA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 644.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JPSA.L trades at £119.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and JPSA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs SOI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 639.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SOI.L trades at £276.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FGQD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 616.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FGQD.L trades at £676.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs BSIF.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while BSIF.L trades at £91.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -45.55. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to BSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JEGI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 506.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JEGI.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JPAS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 478.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JPAS.L trades at £88.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SEIT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SEIT.L trades at £43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JETI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs UIND.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while UIND.L trades at £32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DIG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 386.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DIG.L trades at £298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JEMI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JEMI.L trades at £141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs NAIT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 380.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while NAIT.L trades at £314.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs HFEL.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 370.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while HFEL.L trades at £213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs BIPS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 355.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while BIPS.L trades at £170.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs HINT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and HINT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs CTUK.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CTUK.L trades at £330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs CMHY.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and CMHY.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs AAIF.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while AAIF.L trades at £211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs HHI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 300.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while HHI.L trades at £176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs 0P0000X63U.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, 0P0000X63U.L has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while 0P0000X63U.L trades at £1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas 0P0000X63U.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0000X63U.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and 0P0000X63U.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs JAGI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JAGI.L trades at £369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs CCJI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CCJI.L trades at £188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs AERI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while AERI.L trades at £0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SMIF.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 243.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SMIF.L trades at £85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs ASLI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while ASLI.L trades at £58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DIVI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DIVI.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FAIR.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 227.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FAIR.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs FA17.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FA17.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SCF.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SCF.L trades at £306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JGSA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JGSA.L trades at £115.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JGST.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JGST.L trades at £101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs HEIT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while HEIT.L trades at £91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs CCJS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and CCJS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs IGV.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 201M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while IGV.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs TORO.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while TORO.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs JCGI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JCGI.L trades at £231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SGQD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SGQD.L trades at £328.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and SGQD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and ASIZ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs IVPG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and IVPG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs AEI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while AEI.L trades at £351.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DHSD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DHSD.L trades at £24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MIX.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIX.L trades at £50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs CVCG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CVCG.L trades at £118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MGCI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 163.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MGCI.L trades at £95.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to MGCI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs TIGT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and TIGT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs ASIT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and ASIT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs PGOO.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, PGOO.L has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while PGOO.L trades at £48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas PGOO.L's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to PGOO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to PGOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DEMD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DEMD.L trades at £15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs BRSA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and BRSA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs GABI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while GABI.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GABI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MCT.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MCT.L trades at £125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to MCT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs BERI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while BERI.L trades at £111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs CYN.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CYN.L trades at £200.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -28.61. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs ADIG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while ADIG.L trades at £45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DHS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DHS.L trades at £1,820.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DHSA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DHSA.L trades at £29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs HDIV.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0P00002ANR.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0P00002ANR.L vs FEMD.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FEMD.L trades at £4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs SHRS.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while SHRS.L trades at £257.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs CMPI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while CMPI.L trades at £115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs DHSP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 92.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while DHSP.L trades at £2,227.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs GRIW.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MAV4.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MAV4.L trades at £55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MAV4.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FEMQ.L trades at £4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs VIP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while VIP.L trades at £193.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MIG4.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIG4.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs MATE.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MATE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs RMII.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, RMII.L has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while RMII.L trades at £72.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas RMII.L's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RMII.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to RMII.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs MIG5.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIG5.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIG5.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs MIG1.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIG1.L trades at £37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIG1.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs MIG3.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIG3.L trades at £46.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIG3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs JEFI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.
0P00002ANR.L vs ASCI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and ASCI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs MIG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and MIG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs RCOI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while RCOI.L trades at £0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and RCOI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs EEIA.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while EEIA.L trades at £21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and EEIA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs FEQP.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FEQP.L trades at £8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and FEQP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs BRIG.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while BRIG.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L and BRIG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0P00002ANR.L vs FEUI.L Comparison
0P00002ANR.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0P00002ANR.L stands at 405.7K. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0P00002ANR.L is priced at £1.26, while FEUI.L trades at £5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0P00002ANR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.14, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0P00002ANR.L's ROE is N/A, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0P00002ANR.L is less volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0P00002ANR.L.