Villeroy & Boch AG
Villeroy & Boch AG 0OPA.L Peers
See (0OPA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0OPA.L | $16.85 | +1.20% | 434.39M | 7.41 | $2.28 | +5.49% |
| 0MDT.IL | $64.19 | -0.39% | 16.84B | -4.79 | -$13.40 | N/A |
| HWDN.L | $838.00 | +0.24% | 4.60B | 18.62 | $0.45 | +2.53% |
| 0R6V.L | $12.10 | +0.72% | 522.21M | 10.71 | $1.13 | +7.43% |
| 0N9Z.L | $38.65 | +0.39% | 521.29M | 15.04 | $2.57 | +2.84% |
| DFS.L | $168.00 | +0.90% | 387.56M | 56.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| UPGS.L | $120.00 | +5.26% | 107.17M | 8.57 | $0.14 | N/A |
| VCP.L | $73.00 | +0.14% | 83.43M | -0.36 | -$2.02 | N/A |
| HEAD.L | $93.20 | -0.85% | 74.82M | -3.01 | -$0.31 | N/A |
| CHH.L | $550.00 | N/A | 60.49M | 9.48 | $0.58 | +6.91% |
Stock Comparison
0OPA.L vs 0MDT.IL Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, 0MDT.IL has a market cap of 16.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while 0MDT.IL trades at $64.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas 0MDT.IL's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0MDT.IL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to 0MDT.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs HWDN.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, HWDN.L has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while HWDN.L trades at $838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HWDN.L's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWDN.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to HWDN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs 0R6V.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, 0R6V.L has a market cap of 522.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while 0R6V.L trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas 0R6V.L's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0R6V.L's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to 0R6V.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs 0N9Z.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, 0N9Z.L has a market cap of 521.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while 0N9Z.L trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas 0N9Z.L's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to 0N9Z.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to 0N9Z.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs DFS.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, DFS.L has a market cap of 387.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while DFS.L trades at $168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas DFS.L's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DFS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to DFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs UPGS.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, UPGS.L has a market cap of 107.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while UPGS.L trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas UPGS.L's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UPGS.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0OPA.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and UPGS.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0OPA.L vs VCP.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, VCP.L has a market cap of 83.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while VCP.L trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VCP.L's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VCP.L's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to VCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs HEAD.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, HEAD.L has a market cap of 74.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while HEAD.L trades at $93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas HEAD.L's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEAD.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to HEAD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs CHH.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, CHH.L has a market cap of 60.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while CHH.L trades at $550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CHH.L's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to CHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs ULTP.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, ULTP.L has a market cap of 59.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while ULTP.L trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ULTP.L's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ULTP.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to ULTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs LIKE.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, LIKE.L has a market cap of 47.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while LIKE.L trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LIKE.L's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIKE.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to LIKE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs CFX.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, CFX.L has a market cap of 47.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while CFX.L trades at $810.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CFX.L's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFX.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L and CFX.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0OPA.L vs SDG.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, SDG.L has a market cap of 31.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while SDG.L trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SDG.L's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SDG.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to SDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs PMP.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, PMP.L has a market cap of 22.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while PMP.L trades at $165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PMP.L's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PMP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L is less volatile compared to PMP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0OPA.L.
0OPA.L vs JLH.L Comparison
0OPA.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0OPA.L stands at 434.39M. In comparison, JLH.L has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, 0OPA.L is priced at $16.85, while JLH.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0OPA.L currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas JLH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0OPA.L's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JLH.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0OPA.L and JLH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).