Esprinet S.p.A.
Esprinet S.p.A. (0NFS.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0NFS.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0NFS.L | £4.16 | -4.26% | 206.9M | 4.73 | £0.88 | +9.79% |
| MAW.L | £44,410.00 | +11.00% | 548B | 29.41 | £1,509.94 | +0.21% |
| 0HFB.L | £103.07 | -2.11% | 131.7B | 40.04 | £2.69 | +0.63% |
| 0Z4I.L | £71.85 | -1.91% | 78B | 13.45 | £5.34 | +0.74% |
| 0R2X.L | £61.72 | -2.16% | 52.9B | 49.06 | £1.26 | +1.81% |
| HHPD.L | £6.98 | +0.00% | 48.5B | 8.41 | £0.83 | +3.96% |
| 0QZF.L | £75.09 | -4.29% | 27.2B | 13.00 | £5.78 | +0.13% |
| 0J51.L | £19.79 | -5.27% | 26B | 7.10 | £2.79 | +2.63% |
| 0J2E.L | £24.22 | -3.31% | 23B | 4.37 | £5.60 | +4.67% |
| 0K6F.L | £101.36 | -3.33% | 20.3B | 24.78 | £4.09 | +2.06% |
Stock Comparison
0NFS.L vs MAW.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, MAW.L has a market cap of 548B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while MAW.L trades at £44,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas MAW.L's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to MAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check MAW.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0HFB.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0HFB.L has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0HFB.L trades at £103.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0HFB.L's P/E ratio is 40.04. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HFB.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0HFB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0HFB.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0Z4I.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0Z4I.L has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0Z4I.L trades at £71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0Z4I.L's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0Z4I.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0Z4I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0Z4I.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0R2X.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0R2X.L has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0R2X.L trades at £61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0R2X.L's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0R2X.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0R2X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0R2X.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs HHPD.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, HHPD.L has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while HHPD.L trades at £6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas HHPD.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHPD.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to HHPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check HHPD.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QZF.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QZF.L has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QZF.L trades at £75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QZF.L's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QZF.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0QZF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QZF.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0J51.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0J51.L has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0J51.L trades at £19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0J51.L's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0J51.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0J51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0J51.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0J2E.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0J2E.L has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0J2E.L trades at £24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0J2E.L's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0J2E.L's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0J2E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0J2E.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0K6F.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0K6F.L has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0K6F.L trades at £101.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0K6F.L's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K6F.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0K6F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0K6F.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0KSA.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0KSA.L has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0KSA.L trades at £56.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0KSA.L's P/E ratio is -230.98. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0KSA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0KSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0KSA.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0F0J.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0F0J.L has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0F0J.L trades at £62.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0F0J.L's P/E ratio is 77.61. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0F0J.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0F0J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0F0J.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0LHO.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0LHO.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0LHO.L trades at £79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0LHO.L's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0LHO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0LHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0LHO.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0I14.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0I14.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0I14.L trades at £40.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0I14.L's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I14.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0I14.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0I14.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0LJE.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0LJE.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0LJE.L trades at £147.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0LJE.L's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0LJE.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0LJE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0LJE.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0HI1.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0HI1.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0HI1.L trades at £115.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0HI1.L's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0HI1.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0HI1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0HI1.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0VAG.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0VAG.L has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0VAG.L trades at £118.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0VAG.L's P/E ratio is 73.39. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0VAG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0VAG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0VAG.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs SXS.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, SXS.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while SXS.L trades at £4,078.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas SXS.L's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SXS.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to SXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check SXS.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0J86.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0J86.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0J86.L trades at £75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0J86.L's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0J86.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0J86.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0J86.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QLW.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QLW.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QLW.L trades at £246.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QLW.L's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QLW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0QLW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QLW.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0YQA.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0YQA.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0YQA.L trades at £22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0YQA.L's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0YQA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0YQA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0YQA.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QK5.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QK5.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QK5.L trades at £101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QK5.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QK5.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0QK5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QK5.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs RSW.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, RSW.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while RSW.L trades at £2,905.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas RSW.L's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSW.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to RSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check RSW.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0RTL.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0RTL.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0RTL.L trades at £66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0RTL.L's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0RTL.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0RTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0RTL.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0GEG.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0GEG.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0GEG.L trades at £47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0GEG.L's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0GEG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0GEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0GEG.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0ROQ.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0ROQ.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0ROQ.L trades at £212.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0ROQ.L's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0ROQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0ROQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0ROQ.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0M58.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0M58.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0M58.L trades at £26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0M58.L's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0M58.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0M58.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0M58.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0SE5.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0SE5.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0SE5.L trades at £82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0SE5.L's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0SE5.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0SE5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0SE5.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0ZPV.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0ZPV.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0ZPV.L trades at £22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0ZPV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0ZPV.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0ZPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0ZPV.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0JI9.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0JI9.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0JI9.L trades at £1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0JI9.L's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0JI9.L's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0JI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0JI9.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QHK.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QHK.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QHK.L trades at £66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QHK.L's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QHK.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0QHK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QHK.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QPR.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QPR.L has a market cap of 918.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QPR.L trades at £199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QPR.L's P/E ratio is 77.58. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QPR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0QPR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QPR.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs RPI.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, RPI.L has a market cap of 789.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while RPI.L trades at £408.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas RPI.L's P/E ratio is 81.68. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to RPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check RPI.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QKB.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QKB.L has a market cap of 762.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QKB.L trades at £670.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QKB.L's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QKB.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0QKB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QKB.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0H38.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0H38.L has a market cap of 754.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0H38.L trades at £4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0H38.L's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0H38.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0H38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0H38.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs DSCV.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, DSCV.L has a market cap of 647.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while DSCV.L trades at £674.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas DSCV.L's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSCV.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to DSCV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check DSCV.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QDT.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QDT.L has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QDT.L trades at £6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QDT.L's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QDT.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0QDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QDT.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0NNU.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0NNU.L has a market cap of 572.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0NNU.L trades at £86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0NNU.L's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0NNU.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0NNU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0NNU.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0IF4.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0IF4.L has a market cap of 544.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0IF4.L trades at £6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0IF4.L's P/E ratio is 210.66. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IF4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0IF4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0IF4.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0H0U.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0H0U.L has a market cap of 485.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0H0U.L trades at £42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0H0U.L's P/E ratio is 825.49. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0H0U.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0H0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0H0U.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0FRI.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0FRI.L has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0FRI.L trades at £18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0FRI.L's P/E ratio is 97.93. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0FRI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0FRI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0FRI.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs JDG.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, JDG.L has a market cap of 404.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while JDG.L trades at £6,080.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas JDG.L's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to JDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check JDG.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0DUI.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0DUI.L has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0DUI.L trades at £11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0DUI.L's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0DUI.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0DUI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0DUI.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0OC9.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0OC9.L has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0OC9.L trades at £54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0OC9.L's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0OC9.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0OC9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0OC9.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0K17.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0K17.L has a market cap of 269.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0K17.L trades at £1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0K17.L's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K17.L's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0K17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0K17.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs SRT.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, SRT.L has a market cap of 197.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while SRT.L trades at £79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas SRT.L's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRT.L's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to SRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check SRT.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0K6M.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0K6M.L has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0K6M.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0K6M.L's P/E ratio is 92.87. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0K6M.L's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0K6M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0K6M.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs GHH.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, GHH.L has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while GHH.L trades at £620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas GHH.L's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHH.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to GHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check GHH.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs TTG.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, TTG.L has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while TTG.L trades at £94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas TTG.L's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTG.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to TTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check TTG.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0MTP.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0MTP.L has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0MTP.L trades at £3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0MTP.L's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0MTP.L's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0MTP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0MTP.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0Y2A.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0Y2A.L has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0Y2A.L trades at £57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0Y2A.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0Y2A.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0Y2A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0Y2A.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs QTX.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, QTX.L has a market cap of 130.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while QTX.L trades at £269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas QTX.L's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to QTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check QTX.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs KETL.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, KETL.L has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while KETL.L trades at £42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas KETL.L's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KETL.L's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to KETL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check KETL.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs XAR.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, XAR.L has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while XAR.L trades at £121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas XAR.L's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XAR.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to XAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check XAR.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs SOLI.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, SOLI.L has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while SOLI.L trades at £167.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas SOLI.L's P/E ratio is 167.50. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOLI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to SOLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check SOLI.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs SDI.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, SDI.L has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while SDI.L trades at £85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas SDI.L's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to SDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check SDI.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0QNQ.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0QNQ.L has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0QNQ.L trades at £1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0QNQ.L's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0QNQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0QNQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0QNQ.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0OJJ.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0OJJ.L has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0OJJ.L trades at £3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0OJJ.L's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0OJJ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0OJJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0OJJ.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs WPHO.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, WPHO.L has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while WPHO.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas WPHO.L's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPHO.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to WPHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check WPHO.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs KMK.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, KMK.L has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while KMK.L trades at £5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas KMK.L's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to KMK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check KMK.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0I0B.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0I0B.L has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0I0B.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0I0B.L's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I0B.L's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0I0B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0I0B.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs CPX.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, CPX.L has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while CPX.L trades at £0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas CPX.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPX.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to CPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check CPX.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0IH3.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0IH3.L has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0IH3.L trades at £0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0IH3.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0IH3.L's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to 0IH3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0IH3.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs LST.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, LST.L has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while LST.L trades at £3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas LST.L's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LST.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to LST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check LST.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs STAR.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, STAR.L has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while STAR.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas STAR.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to STAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check STAR.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs TRAK.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, TRAK.L has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while TRAK.L trades at £9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas TRAK.L's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRAK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to TRAK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check TRAK.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs ZYT.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, ZYT.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while ZYT.L trades at £44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas ZYT.L's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZYT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to ZYT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check ZYT.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs HDT.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, HDT.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while HDT.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas HDT.L's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to HDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check HDT.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs NNN.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, NNN.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while NNN.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas NNN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0NFS.L has daily volatility of 0.96 and NNN.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check NNN.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs MSYS.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, MSYS.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while MSYS.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas MSYS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSYS.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to MSYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check MSYS.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs TRAC.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, TRAC.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while TRAC.L trades at £2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas TRAC.L's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRAC.L's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to TRAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check TRAC.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs TWD.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, TWD.L has a market cap of 899.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while TWD.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas TWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWD.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to TWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check TWD.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs PIP.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, PIP.L has a market cap of 499.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while PIP.L trades at £1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas PIP.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to PIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check PIP.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0I17.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0I17.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0I17.L trades at £168.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0I17.L's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0I17.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0I17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0I17.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs 0NEB.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, 0NEB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while 0NEB.L trades at £13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas 0NEB.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 0NEB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to 0NEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check 0NEB.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs PPIX.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, PPIX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while PPIX.L trades at £8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas PPIX.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPIX.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is more volatile compared to PPIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check PPIX.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs OTAQ.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, OTAQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while OTAQ.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas OTAQ.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTAQ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0NFS.L has daily volatility of 0.96 and OTAQ.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check OTAQ.L's competition here
0NFS.L vs ECM.L Comparison August 2025
0NFS.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0NFS.L stands at 206.9M. In comparison, ECM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0NFS.L is priced at £4.16, while ECM.L trades at £1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0NFS.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.73, whereas ECM.L's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0NFS.L's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECM.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0NFS.L is less volatile compared to ECM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0NFS.L.Check ECM.L's competition here