Eni S.p.A.
Eni S.p.A. 0N9S.IL Peers
See (0N9S.IL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0N9S.IL | £14.01 | +1.99% | 43B | 5.27 | £2.66 | +6.92% |
| SHEL.L | £2,615.50 | +1.61% | 154.5B | 16.35 | £1.60 | +4.12% |
| TTE.L | £53.45 | -2.64% | 119.3B | 10.46 | £5.11 | +4.55% |
| BP.L | £379.40 | +3.03% | 59.1B | -75.88 | -£0.05 | +6.44% |
| BP-B.L | £170.00 | -0.29% | 58.2B | -0.02 | -£71.50 | +5.29% |
| BP-A.L | £152.00 | -0.98% | 58.2B | -0.02 | -£71.50 | +5.26% |
| SNGR.L | £10.50 | +0.00% | 43.3B | 75.00 | £0.14 | N/A |
| SGGD.L | £0.65 | +0.00% | 20B | 0.39 | £1.65 | N/A |
| ATAD.IL | £7.50 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 1.00 | £7.50 | +534.94% |
| PETB.L | £15.40 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 4.48 | £3.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0N9S.IL vs SHEL.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, SHEL.L has a market cap of 154.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while SHEL.L trades at £2,615.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas SHEL.L's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHEL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to SHEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs TTE.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, TTE.L has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while TTE.L trades at £53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas TTE.L's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTE.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to TTE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs BP.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, BP.L has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while BP.L trades at £379.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas BP.L's P/E ratio is -75.88. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to BP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs BP-B.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, BP-B.L has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while BP-B.L trades at £170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas BP-B.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BP-B.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to BP-B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs BP-A.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, BP-A.L has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while BP-A.L trades at £152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas BP-A.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BP-A.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to BP-A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs SNGR.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, SNGR.L has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while SNGR.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas SNGR.L's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNGR.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to SNGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs SGGD.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, SGGD.L has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while SGGD.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas SGGD.L's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGGD.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to SGGD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs ATAD.IL Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, ATAD.IL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while ATAD.IL trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas ATAD.IL's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATAD.IL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to ATAD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs PETB.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, PETB.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while PETB.L trades at £15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas PETB.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to PETB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs ATAD.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, ATAD.L has a market cap of 881.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while ATAD.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas ATAD.L's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATAD.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to ATAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs ROSN.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, ROSN.L has a market cap of 807.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while ROSN.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas ROSN.L's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROSN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to ROSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs 0GEA.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, 0GEA.L has a market cap of 695.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while 0GEA.L trades at £3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas 0GEA.L's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to 0GEA.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to 0GEA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs WG.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, WG.L has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while WG.L trades at £18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas WG.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WG.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to WG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs QED.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, QED.L has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while QED.L trades at £4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas QED.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QED.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to QED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs QFI.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, QFI.L has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while QFI.L trades at £1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas QFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QFI.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to QFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs ECHO.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, ECHO.L has a market cap of 960.4K. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while ECHO.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas ECHO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECHO.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to ECHO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs SGGD.IL Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, SGGD.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while SGGD.IL trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas SGGD.IL's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGGD.IL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to SGGD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs ROSN.IL Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, ROSN.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while ROSN.IL trades at £2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas ROSN.IL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROSN.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to ROSN.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs VOG.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, VOG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while VOG.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas VOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VOG.L's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to VOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs RDSB.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, RDSB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while RDSB.L trades at £1,894.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas RDSB.L's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDSB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to RDSB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs SNP.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, SNP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while SNP.L trades at £45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas SNP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to SNP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs LKOD.IL Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, LKOD.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while LKOD.IL trades at £0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas LKOD.IL's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LKOD.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to LKOD.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs RDSA.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, RDSA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while RDSA.L trades at £1,895.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas RDSA.L's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDSA.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is less volatile compared to RDSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.
0N9S.IL vs LKOH.L Comparison
0N9S.IL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0N9S.IL stands at 43B. In comparison, LKOH.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0N9S.IL is priced at £14.01, while LKOH.L trades at £55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0N9S.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 5.27, whereas LKOH.L's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, 0N9S.IL's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LKOH.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0N9S.IL is more volatile compared to LKOH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0N9S.IL.