Tom Tailor Holding SE
Tom Tailor Holding SE 0MMJ.L Peers
See (0MMJ.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0MMJ.L | £0.01 | +33.33% | 344.3K | -0.00 | -£5.42 | N/A |
| 0LCE.L | £128.23 | +0.62% | 143.1B | 46.53 | £2.76 | +1.21% |
| 0JVT.L | £266.55 | -21.11% | 41.8B | 33.86 | £7.87 | N/A |
| 0I6K.L | £121.23 | -1.48% | 37.2B | 8.69 | £13.95 | +1.24% |
| 0JU0.L | £108.92 | -1.66% | 28.6B | 7.44 | £14.64 | +1.84% |
| 0KS6.L | £100.79 | -0.91% | 20.2B | 12.36 | £8.15 | +0.83% |
| 0LD5.L | £78.61 | -1.44% | 16.3B | 25.22 | £3.12 | +2.22% |
| 0KIZ.L | £122.90 | +1.74% | 16.1B | 9.65 | £12.74 | +2.87% |
| 0KTS.L | £273.80 | -0.98% | 16.1B | 33.93 | £8.07 | +1.20% |
| NXT.L | £12,910.00 | -0.19% | 15.1B | 21.30 | £6.06 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
0MMJ.L vs 0LCE.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LCE.L has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LCE.L trades at £128.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LCE.L's P/E ratio is 46.53. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LCE.L's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0LCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JVT.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JVT.L has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JVT.L trades at £266.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JVT.L's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JVT.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0JVT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0I6K.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0I6K.L has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0I6K.L trades at £121.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0I6K.L's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0I6K.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0I6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JU0.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JU0.L has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JU0.L trades at £108.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JU0.L's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JU0.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0JU0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0KS6.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0KS6.L has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0KS6.L trades at £100.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0KS6.L's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0KS6.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KS6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0LD5.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LD5.L has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LD5.L trades at £78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LD5.L's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LD5.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0LD5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0KIZ.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0KIZ.L has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0KIZ.L trades at £122.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0KIZ.L's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0KIZ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KIZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0KTS.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0KTS.L has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0KTS.L trades at £273.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0KTS.L's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0KTS.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KTS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs NXT.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, NXT.L has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while NXT.L trades at £12,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NXT.L's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NXT.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to NXT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0LFS.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LFS.L has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LFS.L trades at £107.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LFS.L's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LFS.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0LFS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0L73.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0L73.L has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0L73.L trades at £62.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0L73.L's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0L73.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0L73.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0J3K.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0J3K.L has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0J3K.L trades at £66.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0J3K.L's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0J3K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0J3K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0ITS.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0ITS.L has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0ITS.L trades at £21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0ITS.L's P/E ratio is -114.27. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0ITS.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0ITS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0K2F.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0K2F.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0K2F.L trades at £101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0K2F.L's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0K2F.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0K2F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JZH.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JZH.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JZH.L trades at £18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JZH.L's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JZH.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0JZH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0RPY.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0RPY.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0RPY.L trades at £83.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0RPY.L's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0RPY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0RPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0R30.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0R30.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0R30.L trades at £12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0R30.L's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0R30.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R30.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0HR3.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0HR3.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0HR3.L trades at £99.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0HR3.L's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0HR3.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0HR3.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0LWH.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LWH.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LWH.L trades at £82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LWH.L's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LWH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0LWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0KEQ.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0KEQ.L has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0KEQ.L trades at £66.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0KEQ.L's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0KEQ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KEQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0R2I.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0R2I.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0R2I.L trades at £6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0R2I.L's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0R2I.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R2I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0KJQ.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0KJQ.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0KJQ.L trades at £41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0KJQ.L's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0KJQ.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0KJQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0K7J.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0K7J.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0K7J.L trades at £5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0K7J.L's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0K7J.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0K7J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0HQ7.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0HQ7.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0HQ7.L trades at £43.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0HQ7.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0HQ7.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0HQ7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0MRM.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0MRM.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0MRM.L trades at £13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0MRM.L's P/E ratio is -317.21. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0MRM.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0MRM.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0J2X.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0J2X.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0J2X.L trades at £4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0J2X.L's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0J2X.L's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0J2X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JTT.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JTT.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JTT.L trades at £9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JTT.L's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JTT.L's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0JTT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0ZFN.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0ZFN.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0ZFN.L trades at £10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0ZFN.L's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0ZFN.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0ZFN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0QKD.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0QKD.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0QKD.L trades at £844.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0QKD.L's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0QKD.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0QKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JSI.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JSI.L trades at £48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JSI.L's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JSI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0JSI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0L9Q.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0L9Q.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0L9Q.L trades at £14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0L9Q.L's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0L9Q.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0L9Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0RDG.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0RDG.L has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0RDG.L trades at £0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0RDG.L's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0RDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0MMJ.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0RDG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0MMJ.L vs 0L9X.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0L9X.L has a market cap of 589.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0L9X.L trades at £4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0L9X.L's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0L9X.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0L9X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0JX9.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0JX9.L has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0JX9.L trades at £13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0JX9.L's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0JX9.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0JX9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0IWV.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0IWV.L has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0IWV.L trades at £34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0IWV.L's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0IWV.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0IWV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0RVA.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0RVA.L has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0RVA.L trades at £5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0RVA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0RVA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0RVA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0N2H.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0N2H.L has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0N2H.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0N2H.L's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0N2H.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0N2H.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0N2Q.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0N2Q.L has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0N2Q.L trades at £44.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0N2Q.L's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0N2Q.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0N2Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0ZNF.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0ZNF.L has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0ZNF.L trades at £13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0ZNF.L's P/E ratio is 100.08. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0ZNF.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0ZNF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0LRL.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LRL.L has a market cap of 225.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LRL.L trades at £2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LRL.L's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LRL.L's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0LRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0F2Z.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0F2Z.L has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0F2Z.L trades at £18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0F2Z.L's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0F2Z.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0F2Z.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0R1C.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0R1C.L has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0R1C.L trades at £0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0R1C.L's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0R1C.L's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R1C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0R38.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0R38.L has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0R38.L trades at £4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0R38.L's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0R38.L's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0R38.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0OGG.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0OGG.L has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0OGG.L trades at £3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0OGG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0OGG.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0OGG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0RQK.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0RQK.L has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0RQK.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0RQK.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0RQK.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0RQK.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0O0E.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0O0E.L has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0O0E.L trades at £0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0O0E.L's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0O0E.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to 0O0E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs BUMP.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, BUMP.L has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while BUMP.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BUMP.L's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BUMP.L's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and BUMP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs 0W0T.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0W0T.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0W0T.L trades at £0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0W0T.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0W0T.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L and 0W0T.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0MMJ.L vs QUIZ.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, QUIZ.L has a market cap of 888.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while QUIZ.L trades at £0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QUIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to QUIZ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to QUIZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs TED.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, TED.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while TED.L trades at £109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TED.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TED.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0MMJ.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and TED.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0MMJ.L vs JOUL.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, JOUL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while JOUL.L trades at £9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JOUL.L's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to JOUL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0MMJ.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and JOUL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0MMJ.L vs FCCN.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, FCCN.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while FCCN.L trades at £29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FCCN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FCCN.L's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0MMJ.L is less volatile compared to FCCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0MMJ.L.
0MMJ.L vs 0LN5.L Comparison
0MMJ.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0MMJ.L stands at 344.3K. In comparison, 0LN5.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0MMJ.L is priced at £0.01, while 0LN5.L trades at £178.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0MMJ.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas 0LN5.L's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, 0MMJ.L's ROE is -1.46%, compared to 0LN5.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0MMJ.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 0LN5.L has daily volatility of N/A.