Adeia Inc.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 105.23B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0A7O.L trades at $414.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0A7O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 35.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0A3O.L trades at $107.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 35666.67. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0A3O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 15.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0IL6.L trades at $269.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0IL6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 12.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SGE.L trades at $1,267.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0U3Q.L trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0U3Q.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0QOA.L trades at $74.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0QOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0DWV.L trades at $181.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 115.34. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0DWV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0OA4.L trades at $180.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1008.94. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0OA4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TRST.L has a market cap of 988.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TRST.L trades at $239.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRST.L's P/E ratio is 239.80. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRST.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to TRST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 986.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while KNOS.L trades at $804.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to KNOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 958.19M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0RS2.L trades at $56.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0RS2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0GM9.L has a market cap of 880.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0GM9.L trades at $153.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0GM9.L's P/E ratio is -47.53. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0GM9.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0GM9.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while LTG.L trades at $99.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to LTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 719.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ALFA.L trades at $243.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ALFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 699.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while GBG.L trades at $278.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 92.83. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to GBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 653.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ATG.L trades at $540.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ATG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while DEV.L trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and DEV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 497.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CER.L trades at $1,685.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to CER.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 462.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while NCC.L trades at $151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to NCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 363.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0L8Z.L trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0L8Z.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 343.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while PBEE.L trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to PBEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while IQG.L trades at $478.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to IQG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 299.65M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while BIG.L trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to BIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 264.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while IDOX.L trades at $58.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to IDOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 262.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while DOTD.L trades at $85.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to DOTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 194.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ACSO.L trades at $481.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ACSO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 186.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while NET.L trades at $112.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to NET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 166.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while APTD.L trades at $299.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to APTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 156.19M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0AAW.L trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0AAW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 145.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0N6K.L trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0N6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 142.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TRCS.L trades at $470.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 235.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to TRCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while GHT.L trades at $161.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and GHT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 124.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SAAS.L trades at $107.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, EYE.L has a market cap of 118.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while EYE.L trades at $400.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EYE.L's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EYE.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to EYE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 116.84M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ELCO.L trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ELCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SPE.L trades at $990.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and SPE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 105.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while IGP.L trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to IGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 96.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SPSY.L trades at $200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SPSY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 95.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SPSC.L trades at $250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and SPSC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 87.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TRB.L trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to TRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.58M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0QK1.L trades at $59.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0QK1.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 82.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CLBS.L trades at $207.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to CLBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 81.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while RM.L trades at $98.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and RM.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 79.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while AOM.L trades at $111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to AOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ACC.L trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and ACC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, WAND.L has a market cap of 75.72M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while WAND.L trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAND.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WAND.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 72.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while OMG.L trades at $58.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to OMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while D4T4.L trades at $177.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to D4T4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, PULS.L has a market cap of 49.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while PULS.L trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PULS.L's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PULS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to PULS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 48.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SPA.L trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 32.21M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SKL.L trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and SKL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CRTA.L trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to CRTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SMRT.L trades at $88.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SMRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 24.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while GETB.L trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to GETB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 23.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CHSS.L trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and CHSS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 20.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ESYS.L trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ESYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ITIM.L trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and ITIM.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 15.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TEK.L trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to TEK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 14.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ALT.L trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 14.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0A8G.L trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 0A8G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 14.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while BIRD.L trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to BIRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 14.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CKT.L trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to CKT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 13.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while CRDL.L trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to CRDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 13.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while PEN.L trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to PEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 10.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ARC.L trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ARC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 9.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ZOO.L trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ZOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ING.L trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ING.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while S247.L trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to S247.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to S247.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 6.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TERN.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to TERN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 4GBL.L trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to 4GBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 6.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while EXR.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to EXR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 5.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while MBT.L trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and MBT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while 0O8X.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and 0O8X.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 3.19M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while TIDE.L trades at $48.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and TIDE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while RTOP.L trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and RTOP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while AIQ.L trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and AIQ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ACRM.L trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ACRM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while RDT.L trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to RDT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while OBC.L trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 2.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while MBO.L trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and MBO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SYME.L trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and SYME.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SORT.L trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to SORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while DSG.L trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and DSG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.43M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while LOOP.L trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and LOOP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ENET.L trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to ENET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954336.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while PTRO.L trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665361.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while INX.L trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to INX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9108.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while LSAI.L trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L and LSAI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, IDEA.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while IDEA.L trades at $349.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDEA.L's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDEA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to IDEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, DMTR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while DMTR.L trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DMTR.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and DMTR.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, MNO.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while MNO.L trades at $12.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNO.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to MNO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, SIM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while SIM.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIM.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and SIM.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, ATQT.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while ATQT.L trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATQT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATQT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and ATQT.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, AVV.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while AVV.L trades at $3,219.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0M2A.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and AVV.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0M2A.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0M2A.L stands at 1.34B. In comparison, VRE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0M2A.L is priced at $13.20, while VRE.L trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0M2A.L currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 0M2A.L's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0M2A.L is less volatile compared to VRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0M2A.L.