The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Sherwin-Williams Company 0L5V.L Peers
See (0L5V.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0L5V.L vs BHP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 92.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BHP.L trades at $1,827.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs RIO.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 77.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while RIO.L trades at $4,502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 75.49B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R2J.L trades at $156.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 66.95. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 72.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0IFA.L trades at $255.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 66.46. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 71.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0L8B.L trades at $88.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 61.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HBH.L trades at $274.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.77B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0Z4C.L trades at $231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 29.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GLEN.L trades at $246.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -24.69. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 28.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0K9L.L trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 27.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0NHS.L trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs AAL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 25.92B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while AAL.L trades at $2,136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 25.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0KEI.L trades at $110.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 18.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0EDD.L trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 14.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UGS.L trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -84.17. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 13.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HQU.L trades at $80.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 11.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R07.L trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0KXS.L trades at $176.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0LVK.L trades at $80.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 9.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0LJ9.L trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 9.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0K3B.L trades at $30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 8.91B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0IF3.L trades at $77.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0U6C.L trades at $33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HC7.L trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HCB.L trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs S32.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while S32.L trades at $136.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QYN.L trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HUR.L trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0IK3.L trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VBE.L trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -151.73. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0I0H.L trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0AHJ.L trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -16.40. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VL5.L trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VGM.L trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R0U.L trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0L45.L trades at $55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R0A.L trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 156.83. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0TWH.L trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0L5V.L has daily volatility of 2.55 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0L5V.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VGE.L trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QYM.L trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VOA.L trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VHI.L trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0KW8.L trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0HWG.L trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0NZN.L trades at $818.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R2C.L trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R11.L trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QZ2.L trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 710.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0G5B.L trades at $125.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 659.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ADT1.L trades at $191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 490.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0O6D.L trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 436.73M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0KD1.L trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -37.13. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 418.53M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0JZT.L trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 389.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VIK.L trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KMR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 360.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KMR.L trades at $403.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GFM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 337.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GFM.L trades at $183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 213.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SOLG.L trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SVML.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 210.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SVML.L trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 204.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UYN.L trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 176.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0P07.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 169.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R20.L trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BSE.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BSE.L trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 146.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0RRC.L trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs TRR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.44M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while TRR.L trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 140.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ECOR.L trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 135.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CAPD.L trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KP2.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 132.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KP2.L trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 122.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0V46.L trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 115.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VNO.L trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SAV.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 104.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SAV.L trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs JLP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 98.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while JLP.L trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 93.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CUSN.L trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs PRE.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 90.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while PRE.L trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs RBW.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 77.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while RBW.L trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 76.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0IYS.L trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UIK.L trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KOD.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 70.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KOD.L trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 66.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QQR.L trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0R0D.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs MKA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 63.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while MKA.L trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.65M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QVG.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs HE1.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 53.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while HE1.L trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while AFRK.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ALL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 50.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ALL.L trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ATM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 50.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ATM.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 42.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UVX.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0ICI.L trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UYO.L trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 37.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QPH.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs FAR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 32.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while FAR.L trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs FOX.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while FOX.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ARS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 29.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ARS.L trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs NMT.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.87M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while NMT.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ZNWD.L trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 25.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 1SN.L trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KAV.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 23.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KAV.L trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs EMH.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while EMH.L trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ARCM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ARCM.L has a market cap of 21.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ARCM.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ARCM.L's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ARCM.L's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ARCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GSP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GSP.L trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0V7X.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs PREM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 19.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while PREM.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs MTR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, MTR.L has a market cap of 15.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while MTR.L trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas MTR.L's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MTR.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to MTR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs RMR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 14.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while RMR.L trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs POW.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, POW.L has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while POW.L trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas POW.L's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to POW.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to POW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs LND.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, LND.L has a market cap of 13.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while LND.L trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas LND.L's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to LND.L's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to LND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs MET1.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 12.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while MET1.L trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs VAST.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, VAST.L has a market cap of 11.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while VAST.L trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas VAST.L's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to VAST.L's ROE of +9.92%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to VAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 80M.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 80M.L has a market cap of 11.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 80M.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 80M.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 80M.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 80M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UXL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UXL.L has a market cap of 10.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UXL.L trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UXL.L's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UXL.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UXL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0URM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0URM.L has a market cap of 10.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0URM.L trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0URM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0URM.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0URM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CRCL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 9.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CRCL.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GLR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GLR.L has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GLR.L trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GLR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GLR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to GLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs PXC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, PXC.L has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while PXC.L trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas PXC.L's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PXC.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to PXC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CLA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CLA.L has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CLA.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CLA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CLA.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to CLA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ARV.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ARV.L has a market cap of 9.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ARV.L trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ARV.L's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ARV.L's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ARV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CMET.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CMET.L has a market cap of 9.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CMET.L trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CMET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CMET.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to CMET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BRES.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BRES.L has a market cap of 9.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BRES.L trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BRES.L's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BRES.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to BRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UX6.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UX6.L has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UX6.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UX6.L's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UX6.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UX6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs RMM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, RMM.L has a market cap of 8.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while RMM.L trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas RMM.L's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RMM.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to RMM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs TGR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, TGR.L has a market cap of 8.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while TGR.L trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas TGR.L's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TGR.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to TGR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0QQJ.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0QQJ.L has a market cap of 7.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0QQJ.L trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0QQJ.L's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0QQJ.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0QQJ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CTL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CTL.L has a market cap of 7.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CTL.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CTL.L's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CTL.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to CTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs FRG.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, FRG.L has a market cap of 7.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while FRG.L trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas FRG.L's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FRG.L's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to FRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0V4O.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0V4O.L has a market cap of 7.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0V4O.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0V4O.L's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0V4O.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0V4O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GROC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GROC.L has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GROC.L trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GROC.L's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GROC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to GROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BMN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BMN.L has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BMN.L trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BMN.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BMN.L's ROE of -259.87%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to BMN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs PYX.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, PYX.L has a market cap of 6.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while PYX.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas PYX.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PYX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to PYX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs MNRG.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, MNRG.L has a market cap of 6.86M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while MNRG.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas MNRG.L's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MNRG.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to MNRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0RH8.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0RH8.L has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0RH8.L trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0RH8.L's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0RH8.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0RH8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UY6.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UY6.L has a market cap of 6.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UY6.L trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UY6.L's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UY6.L's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UY6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs TUN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, TUN.L has a market cap of 6.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while TUN.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas TUN.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TUN.L's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to TUN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SML.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SML.L has a market cap of 6.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SML.L trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SML.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SML.L's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KDNC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KDNC.L has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KDNC.L trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KDNC.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KDNC.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KDNC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs IRON.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, IRON.L has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while IRON.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas IRON.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IRON.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to IRON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ATN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ATN.L has a market cap of 5.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ATN.L trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ATN.L's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ATN.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to ATN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0P3V.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0P3V.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0P3V.L trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0P3V.L's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0P3V.L's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0P3V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs JAY.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, JAY.L has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while JAY.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas JAY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to JAY.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to JAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BEM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BEM.L has a market cap of 4.86M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BEM.L trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BEM.L's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BEM.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to BEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs THR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, THR.L has a market cap of 4.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while THR.L trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas THR.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to THR.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to THR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BMV.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BMV.L has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BMV.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BMV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BMV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to BMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BZT.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BZT.L has a market cap of 4.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BZT.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BZT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BZT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to BZT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs IMC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, IMC.L has a market cap of 4.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while IMC.L trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas IMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IMC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to IMC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs AYM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, AYM.L has a market cap of 4.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while AYM.L trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas AYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AYM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to AYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0T9J.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0T9J.L has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0T9J.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0T9J.L's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0T9J.L's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0T9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BHL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BHL.L has a market cap of 3.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BHL.L trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BHL.L's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BHL.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to BHL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs WRES.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, WRES.L has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while WRES.L trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas WRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to WRES.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to WRES.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ORM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ORM.L has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ORM.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ORM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ORM.L's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to ORM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ALBA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ALBA.L has a market cap of 3.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ALBA.L trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ALBA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ALBA.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to ALBA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UFP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UFP.L has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UFP.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UFP.L's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UFP.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs PFP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, PFP.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while PFP.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas PFP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to PFP.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to PFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs REE.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, REE.L has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while REE.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas REE.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to REE.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to REE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs RRR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, RRR.L has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while RRR.L trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas RRR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to RRR.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to RRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs FCM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, FCM.L has a market cap of 2.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while FCM.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas FCM.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to FCM.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to FCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0IYU.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0IYU.L has a market cap of 2.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0IYU.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0IYU.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0IYU.L's ROE of +5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to 0IYU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs AFP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, AFP.L has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while AFP.L trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas AFP.L's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AFP.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to AFP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs URU.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, URU.L has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while URU.L trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas URU.L's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to URU.L's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to URU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs TM1.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, TM1.L has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while TM1.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas TM1.L's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TM1.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to TM1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs UMR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, UMR.L has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while UMR.L trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas UMR.L's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to UMR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to UMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SKA.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SKA.L has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SKA.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SKA.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SKA.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs EUZ.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, EUZ.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while EUZ.L trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas EUZ.L's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to EUZ.L's ROE of -193.71%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to EUZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs TYM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, TYM.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while TYM.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas TYM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to TYM.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to TYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CDL.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CDL.L has a market cap of 1.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CDL.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CDL.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CDL.L's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to CDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs JAN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, JAN.L has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while JAN.L trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas JAN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to JAN.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to JAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ARK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ARK.L has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ARK.L trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ARK.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ARK.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to ARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KRS.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KRS.L has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KRS.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KRS.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KRS.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs GWMO.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, GWMO.L has a market cap of 952455.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while GWMO.L trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas GWMO.L's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to GWMO.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to GWMO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs HZM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, HZM.L has a market cap of 876782.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while HZM.L trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas HZM.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to HZM.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to HZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SRES.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SRES.L has a market cap of 760788.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SRES.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SRES.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SRES.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to SRES.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CHF.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CHF.L has a market cap of 749386.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CHF.L trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CHF.L's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CHF.L's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to CHF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs CRTM.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, CRTM.L has a market cap of 657050.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while CRTM.L trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas CRTM.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to CRTM.L's ROE of +28.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to CRTM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs ACP.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, ACP.L has a market cap of 560115.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while ACP.L trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas ACP.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to ACP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to ACP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs KEN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, KEN.L has a market cap of 498522.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while KEN.L trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas KEN.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to KEN.L's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to KEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs AMC.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, AMC.L has a market cap of 8688.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while AMC.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas AMC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to AMC.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to AMC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0FSN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0FSN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0FSN.L trades at $141.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0FSN.L's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0FSN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0FSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0K69.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0K69.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0K69.L trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0K69.L's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0K69.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0K69.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0MFI.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0MFI.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0MFI.L trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0MFI.L's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0MFI.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0MFI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0UR5.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0UR5.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0UR5.L trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0UR5.L's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0UR5.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0UR5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs MNOD.IL Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, MNOD.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while MNOD.IL trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas MNOD.IL's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to MNOD.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to MNOD.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0VDK.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0VDK.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0VDK.L trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0VDK.L's P/E ratio is -36.04. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0VDK.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0VDK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs IRR.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, IRR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while IRR.L trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas IRR.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to IRR.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to IRR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs SO4.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, SO4.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while SO4.L trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas SO4.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to SO4.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is less volatile compared to SO4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs BCN.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, BCN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while BCN.L trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas BCN.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to BCN.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to BCN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs NSH.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, NSH.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while NSH.L trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas NSH.L's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to NSH.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to NSH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
0L5V.L vs 0V38.L Comparison
0L5V.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0L5V.L stands at 90.89B. In comparison, 0V38.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0L5V.L is priced at $362.67, while 0V38.L trades at $49.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0L5V.L currently has a P/E ratio of 52.66, whereas 0V38.L's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, 0L5V.L's ROE is +0.67%, compared to 0V38.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0L5V.L is more volatile compared to 0V38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0L5V.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP.L | $1,827.50 | +1.56% | 92.74B | 10.88 | $1.68 | +4.99% |
| 0L5V.L | $362.67 | +2.74% | 90.89B | 52.66 | $6.89 | +0.82% |
| RIO.L | $4,502.00 | +1.63% | 77.43B | 8.48 | $5.31 | +6.89% |
| 0R2J.L | $156.79 | -3.14% | 75.49B | 66.95 | $2.34 | +0.89% |
| 0IFA.L | $255.29 | +0.65% | 72.41B | 66.46 | $3.84 | +0.96% |
| 0L8B.L | $88.95 | -1.18% | 71.52B | 20.12 | $4.42 | +3.01% |
| 0HBH.L | $274.82 | +1.32% | 61.14B | 27.37 | $10.04 | +2.60% |
| 0Z4C.L | $231.20 | -2.78% | 32.77B | 35.01 | $6.60 | +1.73% |
| GLEN.L | $246.90 | +0.98% | 29.67B | -24.69 | -$0.10 | +2.37% |
| 0K9L.L | $121.75 | +1.71% | 28.09B | 4.38 | $27.80 | +1.80% |