The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 0KEF.L Peers
See (0KEF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0KEF.L vs 0O84.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0O84.L has a market cap of 277.10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0O84.L trades at $186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0O84.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0O84.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0O84.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs SBID.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, SBID.L has a market cap of 56.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while SBID.L trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas SBID.L's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBID.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to SBID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs SANB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, SANB.L has a market cap of 44.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while SANB.L trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas SANB.L's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SANB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to SANB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs LLOY.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, LLOY.L has a market cap of 43.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while LLOY.L trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas LLOY.L's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLOY.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to LLOY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs AXB.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, AXB.IL has a market cap of 41.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while AXB.IL trades at $67.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas AXB.IL's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to AXB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0JW2.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0JW2.L has a market cap of 28.48B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0JW2.L trades at $177.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0JW2.L's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0JW2.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0JW2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs AXB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, AXB.L has a market cap of 27.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while AXB.L trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas AXB.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXB.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to AXB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs AIBG.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, AIBG.L has a market cap of 12.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while AIBG.L trades at $522.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas AIBG.L's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIBG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to AIBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs BIRG.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, BIRG.L has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while BIRG.L trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas BIRG.L's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIRG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to BIRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs HSBK.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, HSBK.IL has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while HSBK.IL trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas HSBK.IL's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBK.IL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to HSBK.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs FEDS.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, FEDS.L has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while FEDS.L trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas FEDS.L's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FEDS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to FEDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs TCS.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, TCS.IL has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while TCS.IL trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas TCS.IL's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCS.IL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to TCS.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs CBKD.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, CBKD.L has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while CBKD.L trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas CBKD.L's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBKD.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to CBKD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs CBKD.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, CBKD.IL has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while CBKD.IL trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas CBKD.IL's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBKD.IL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to CBKD.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0EFW.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0EFW.L has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0EFW.L trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0EFW.L's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0EFW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0EFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs BGEO.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, BGEO.L has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while BGEO.L trades at $6,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas BGEO.L's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGEO.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to BGEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs VMUK.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, VMUK.L has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while VMUK.L trades at $217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas VMUK.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMUK.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to VMUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs NLB.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, NLB.IL has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while NLB.IL trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NLB.IL's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLB.IL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to NLB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs TBCG.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, TBCG.L has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while TBCG.L trades at $4,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas TBCG.L's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBCG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to TBCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs HSBK.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, HSBK.L has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while HSBK.L trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas HSBK.L's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSBK.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to HSBK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0RE6.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0RE6.L has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0RE6.L trades at $125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0RE6.L's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0RE6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0RE6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0RMP.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0RMP.L has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0RMP.L trades at $247.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0RMP.L's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0RMP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0RMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs BOCH.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, BOCH.L has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while BOCH.L trades at $375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas BOCH.L's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOCH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to BOCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs NBS.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, NBS.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while NBS.L trades at $131.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NBS.L's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to NBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs XD5D.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, XD5D.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while XD5D.L trades at $82.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas XD5D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XD5D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to XD5D.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QLT.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QLT.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QLT.L trades at $1,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QLT.L's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0QLT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs IL0A.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, IL0A.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while IL0A.L trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas IL0A.L's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IL0A.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to IL0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs NLB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, NLB.L has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while NLB.L trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas NLB.L's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to NLB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs PTSB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, PTSB.L has a market cap of 926.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while PTSB.L trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas PTSB.L's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTSB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to PTSB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs MTRO.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, MTRO.L has a market cap of 747.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while MTRO.L trades at $111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MTRO.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTRO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to MTRO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QS4.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QS4.L has a market cap of 588.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QS4.L trades at $147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QS4.L's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QS4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0QS4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QQ4.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QQ4.L has a market cap of 519.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QQ4.L trades at $922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QQ4.L's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QQ4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0QQ4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QLU.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QLU.L has a market cap of 393.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QLU.L trades at $77.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QLU.L's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0QLU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QKG.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QKG.L has a market cap of 332.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QKG.L trades at $3,320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QKG.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QKG.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to 0QKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QV3.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QV3.L has a market cap of 298.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QV3.L trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QV3.L's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QV3.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0QV3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0QLK.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0QLK.L has a market cap of 296.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0QLK.L trades at $4,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0QLK.L's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0QLK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0QLK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs 0ROV.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, 0ROV.L has a market cap of 166.14M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while 0ROV.L trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas 0ROV.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 0ROV.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to 0ROV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs ARBB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, ARBB.L has a market cap of 147.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while ARBB.L trades at $912.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas ARBB.L's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARBB.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to ARBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs STB.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, STB.L has a market cap of 108.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while STB.L trades at $580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas STB.L's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to STB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs MFX.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, MFX.L has a market cap of 22.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while MFX.L trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas MFX.L's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFX.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to MFX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs VTBR.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, VTBR.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while VTBR.L trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas VTBR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTBR.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0KEF.L has daily volatility of 0.05 and VTBR.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0KEF.L vs CIHL.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, CIHL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while CIHL.L trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas CIHL.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIHL.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to CIHL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs JEO.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, JEO.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while JEO.L trades at $843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas JEO.L's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to JEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs ATMA.L Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, ATMA.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while ATMA.L trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas ATMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATMA.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is less volatile compared to ATMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs SBER.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, SBER.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while SBER.IL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas SBER.IL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBER.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0KEF.L is more volatile compared to SBER.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0KEF.L.
0KEF.L vs VTBR.IL Comparison
0KEF.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0KEF.L stands at 65.94B. In comparison, VTBR.IL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0KEF.L is priced at $166.69, while VTBR.IL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0KEF.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.11, whereas VTBR.IL's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, 0KEF.L's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTBR.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0KEF.L has daily volatility of 0.05 and VTBR.IL has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0O84.L | $186.10 | -0.48% | 277.10B | N/A | N/A | +9.00% |
0KEF.L | $166.69 | -0.56% | 65.94B | 14.11 | $11.81 | +3.84% |
SBID.L | $63.40 | N/A | 56.58B | 6.03 | $10.51 | +2.58% |
SANB.L | $142.50 | +0.35% | 44.25B | 0.32 | $4.40 | +0.06% |
LLOY.L | $73.02 | +0.52% | 43.82B | 12.17 | $0.06 | +0.04% |
AXB.IL | $67.40 | -0.15% | 41.76B | 27.62 | $2.44 | +0.09% |
0JW2.L | $177.41 | +1.63% | 28.48B | 13.55 | $13.09 | +3.04% |
AXB.L | $44.80 | N/A | 27.76B | 8.41 | $5.33 | N/A |
AIBG.L | $522.00 | -1.14% | 12.15B | 6.61 | $0.79 | +5.03% |
BIRG.L | $10.82 | +0.93% | 10.66B | 7.62 | $1.42 | +5.72% |