Huhtamäki Oyj
Huhtamäki Oyj (0K9W.IL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0K9W.IL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0K9W.IL | £30.36 | +0.36% | 3.2B | 13.86 | £2.17 | +3.32% |
| 0JCB.L | £55.48 | -0.08% | 22.9B | 12.23 | £4.54 | +3.98% |
| SKG.L | £4,180.00 | +4.32% | 21.9B | 16.99 | £2.46 | N/A |
| IPC.L | £3,415.00 | +0.59% | 19.2B | -875.00 | -£0.04 | +1.97% |
| SWR.L | £3,292.00 | -0.54% | 17.4B | 53.66 | £0.62 | +3.43% |
| 0KEZ.L | £192.94 | -0.42% | 17.4B | 19.74 | £9.78 | +2.58% |
| 0HL5.L | £57.24 | +1.08% | 15.8B | 16.73 | £3.41 | +1.40% |
| 0LW9.L | £51.64 | +4.37% | 13.1B | 17.39 | £2.97 | N/A |
| 0HJR.L | £167.32 | +1.00% | 13B | 19.08 | £8.72 | +2.14% |
| 0I4X.L | £99.04 | +0.93% | 11.4B | -22.51 | -£4.34 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
0K9W.IL vs 0JCB.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0JCB.L has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0JCB.L trades at £55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0JCB.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0JCB.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0JCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0JCB.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs SKG.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SKG.L has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while SKG.L trades at £4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas SKG.L's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to SKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check SKG.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs IPC.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IPC.L has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while IPC.L trades at £3,415.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas IPC.L's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IPC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to IPC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check IPC.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs SWR.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SWR.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while SWR.L trades at £3,292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas SWR.L's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to SWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check SWR.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0KEZ.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0KEZ.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0KEZ.L trades at £192.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0KEZ.L's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0KEZ.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0KEZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0KEZ.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0HL5.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0HL5.L has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0HL5.L trades at £57.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0HL5.L's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HL5.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0HL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0HL5.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0LW9.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0LW9.L has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0LW9.L trades at £51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0LW9.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0LW9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0LW9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0LW9.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0HJR.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0HJR.L has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0HJR.L trades at £167.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0HJR.L's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HJR.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0HJR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0HJR.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0I4X.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0I4X.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0I4X.L trades at £99.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0I4X.L's P/E ratio is -22.51. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0I4X.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0I4X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0I4X.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs SMDS.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SMDS.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while SMDS.L trades at £582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas SMDS.L's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMDS.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to SMDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check SMDS.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0HN1.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0HN1.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0HN1.L trades at £68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0HN1.L's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HN1.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0HN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0HN1.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0CX9.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0CX9.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0CX9.L trades at £9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0CX9.L's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0CX9.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0CX9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0CX9.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0L4F.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0L4F.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0L4F.L trades at £30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0L4F.L's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0L4F.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0L4F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0L4F.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0EOF.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0EOF.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0EOF.L trades at £29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0EOF.L's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0EOF.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0EOF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0EOF.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0K9W.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0K9W.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0K9W.L trades at £36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0K9W.L's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0K9W.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0K9W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0K9W.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0O7A.IL Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0O7A.IL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0O7A.IL trades at £3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0O7A.IL's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0O7A.IL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to 0O7A.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0O7A.IL's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0NNC.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0NNC.L has a market cap of 694.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0NNC.L trades at £7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0NNC.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0NNC.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0NNC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0NNC.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0O33.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0O33.L has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0O33.L trades at £9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0O33.L's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0O33.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0O33.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0O33.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs 0D1X.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, 0D1X.L has a market cap of 548.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while 0D1X.L trades at £30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas 0D1X.L's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0D1X.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to 0D1X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check 0D1X.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs MACF.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MACF.L has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while MACF.L trades at £99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas MACF.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MACF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to MACF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check MACF.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs SYM.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SYM.L has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while SYM.L trades at £12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas SYM.L's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SYM.L's ROE of +268.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is less volatile compared to SYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check SYM.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs RBN.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RBN.L has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while RBN.L trades at £121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas RBN.L's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to RBN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check RBN.L's competition here
0K9W.IL vs CRU.L Comparison August 2025
0K9W.IL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0K9W.IL stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRU.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0K9W.IL is priced at £30.36, while CRU.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0K9W.IL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.86, whereas CRU.L's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, 0K9W.IL's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRU.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0K9W.IL is more volatile compared to CRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0K9W.IL.Check CRU.L's competition here