Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 0JZ0.L Peers
See (0JZ0.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0JZ0.L vs CRH.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, CRH.L has a market cap of 48.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while CRH.L trades at $7,094.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas CRH.L's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRH.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to CRH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0LRK.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0LRK.L has a market cap of 35.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0LRK.L trades at $269.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0LRK.L's P/E ratio is 59.76. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0LRK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0LRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0QKY.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0QKY.L has a market cap of 24.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0QKY.L trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0QKY.L's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QKY.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0QKY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0QQ2.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0QQ2.L has a market cap of 18.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0QQ2.L trades at $495.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0QQ2.L's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QQ2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0QQ2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0JZ1.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0JZ1.L has a market cap of 13.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0JZ1.L trades at $62.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0JZ1.L's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0JZ1.L's ROE of -4.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0JZ1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0Y5C.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0Y5C.L has a market cap of 12.16B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0Y5C.L trades at $141.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0Y5C.L's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0Y5C.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0Y5C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0RH9.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0RH9.L has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0RH9.L trades at $182.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0RH9.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0RH9.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L and 0RH9.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0JZ0.L vs 0M6J.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0M6J.L has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0M6J.L trades at $123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0M6J.L's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0M6J.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0M6J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs BREE.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, BREE.L has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while BREE.L trades at $445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas BREE.L's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BREE.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to BREE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs SRC.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, SRC.L has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while SRC.L trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas SRC.L's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to SRC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs IBST.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, IBST.L has a market cap of 732.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while IBST.L trades at $186.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas IBST.L's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IBST.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to IBST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs MSLH.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, MSLH.L has a market cap of 725.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while MSLH.L trades at $287.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas MSLH.L's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSLH.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to MSLH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs JHDA.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, JHDA.L has a market cap of 690.89M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while JHDA.L trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas JHDA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JHDA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L and JHDA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0JZ0.L vs 0R6S.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0R6S.L has a market cap of 623.65M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0R6S.L trades at $56.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0R6S.L's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0R6S.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to 0R6S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs FORT.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, FORT.L has a market cap of 401.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while FORT.L trades at $190.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas FORT.L's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to FORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs MBH.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, MBH.L has a market cap of 98.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while MBH.L trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas MBH.L's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBH.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to MBH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs STCM.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, STCM.L has a market cap of 35.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while STCM.L trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas STCM.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STCM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to STCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 0P000147QB.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 0P000147QB.L has a market cap of 14.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 0P000147QB.L trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 0P000147QB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0P000147QB.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L and 0P000147QB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0JZ0.L vs PU12.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, PU12.L has a market cap of 9.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while PU12.L trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas PU12.L's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PU12.L's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to PU12.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs ECOB.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, ECOB.L has a market cap of 6.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while ECOB.L trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas ECOB.L's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECOB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JZ0.L is less volatile compared to ECOB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JZ0.L.
0JZ0.L vs 97GM.L Comparison
0JZ0.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JZ0.L stands at 32.73B. In comparison, 97GM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0JZ0.L is priced at $542.99, while 97GM.L trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JZ0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 51.63, whereas 97GM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JZ0.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 97GM.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0JZ0.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and 97GM.L has daily volatility of N/A.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRH.L | $7,094.00 | -0.28% | 48.08B | 20.10 | $3.53 | +1.41% |
0LRK.L | $269.53 | -0.18% | 35.61B | 59.76 | $4.51 | +0.69% |
0JZ0.L | $542.99 | +1.30% | 32.73B | 51.63 | $10.52 | +0.58% |
0QKY.L | $41.60 | -0.71% | 24.80B | 11.18 | $3.72 | +6.73% |
0QQ2.L | $495.10 | -0.89% | 18.02B | 23.70 | $20.89 | +2.18% |
0JZ1.L | $62.18 | +2.88% | 13.12B | 27.77 | $2.24 | +1.90% |
0Y5C.L | $141.31 | -0.65% | 12.16B | 27.09 | $5.22 | +1.38% |
0RH9.L | $182.40 | N/A | 4.38B | 15.38 | $11.86 | +2.19% |
0M6J.L | $123.40 | +1.65% | 2.02B | 6.58 | $18.76 | N/A |
BREE.L | $445.00 | -1.11% | 1.54B | 15.89 | $0.28 | +3.26% |