MGM Resorts International
MGM Resorts International 0JWC.L Peers
See (0JWC.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0JWC.L | £37.55 | +1.25% | 10.2B | 11.93 | £3.14 | N/A |
| FLTR.L | £22,300.00 | -2.28% | 39.4B | 105.69 | £2.11 | N/A |
| 0A37.L | £164.30 | -16.86% | 27.5B | 224.99 | £0.75 | +2.88% |
| 0ABA.L | £37.05 | +1.20% | 18.4B | -9.14 | -£4.05 | N/A |
| ENT.L | £959.00 | +1.25% | 6.1B | -13.51 | -£0.71 | +1.43% |
| 0LK3.L | £160.81 | +1.73% | 6B | 20.76 | £7.75 | +6.90% |
| 0EAW.L | £188.69 | +0.00% | 4B | 160.58 | £1.18 | N/A |
| 0O80.L | £106.00 | +1.92% | 2.6B | 353.33 | £0.30 | +1.44% |
| PTEC.L | £386.50 | +0.39% | 1.2B | 24.16 | £0.16 | +1.26% |
| RNK.L | £156.60 | +6.39% | 733.6M | 22.37 | £0.07 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
0JWC.L vs FLTR.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FLTR.L has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while FLTR.L trades at £22,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas FLTR.L's P/E ratio is 105.69. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLTR.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to FLTR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0A37.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0A37.L has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0A37.L trades at £164.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0A37.L's P/E ratio is 224.99. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0A37.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to 0A37.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0ABA.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0ABA.L has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0ABA.L trades at £37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0ABA.L's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0ABA.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is more volatile compared to 0ABA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs ENT.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ENT.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while ENT.L trades at £959.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas ENT.L's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENT.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to ENT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0LK3.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0LK3.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0LK3.L trades at £160.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0LK3.L's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0LK3.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to 0LK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0EAW.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0EAW.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0EAW.L trades at £188.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0EAW.L's P/E ratio is 160.58. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0EAW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to 0EAW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0O80.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0O80.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0O80.L trades at £106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0O80.L's P/E ratio is 353.33. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0O80.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is more volatile compared to 0O80.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs PTEC.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PTEC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while PTEC.L trades at £386.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas PTEC.L's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PTEC.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to PTEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs RNK.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RNK.L has a market cap of 733.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while RNK.L trades at £156.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas RNK.L's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RNK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to RNK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 888.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 888.L has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 888.L trades at £85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 888.L's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 888.L's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is more volatile compared to 888.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs EVOK.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EVOK.L has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while EVOK.L trades at £61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas EVOK.L's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EVOK.L's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to EVOK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs GMR.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GMR.L has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while GMR.L trades at £53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas GMR.L's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to GMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs BOTB.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, BOTB.L has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while BOTB.L trades at £532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas BOTB.L's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BOTB.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to BOTB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs B90.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, B90.L has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while B90.L trades at £2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas B90.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to B90.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to B90.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs CMX.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CMX.L has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while CMX.L trades at £57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas CMX.L's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is more volatile compared to CMX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs SPO.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SPO.L has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while SPO.L trades at £84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas SPO.L's P/E ratio is -16.80. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SPO.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0JWC.L has daily volatility of 0.83 and SPO.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0JWC.L vs TNT.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TNT.L has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while TNT.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas TNT.L's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TNT.L's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0JWC.L has daily volatility of 0.83 and TNT.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0JWC.L vs MIN.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MIN.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while MIN.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas MIN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is more volatile compared to MIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs WEB.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WEB.L has a market cap of 295K. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while WEB.L trades at £0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas WEB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WEB.L's ROE of -25.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to WEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs 0SYQ.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, 0SYQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while 0SYQ.L trades at £9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas 0SYQ.L's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 0SYQ.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to 0SYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.
0JWC.L vs GYS.L Comparison
0JWC.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JWC.L stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GYS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JWC.L is priced at £37.55, while GYS.L trades at £1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JWC.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.93, whereas GYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, 0JWC.L's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GYS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JWC.L is less volatile compared to GYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JWC.L.