M&T Bank Corporation
M&T Bank Corporation 0JW2.L Peers
See (0JW2.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0JW2.L | £185.36 | -0.22% | 29.8B | 14.16 | £13.09 | +2.91% |
| 0O84.L | £186.10 | -0.48% | 276B | N/A | N/A | +9.00% |
| 0KEF.L | £177.79 | -1.32% | 70.3B | 15.05 | £11.81 | +3.60% |
| SBID.L | £63.40 | N/A | 56.6B | 6.28 | £10.09 | +2.84% |
| SANB.L | £153.50 | +0.66% | 47.7B | 0.35 | £4.40 | +0.06% |
| LLOY.L | £76.06 | +0.50% | 45.5B | 12.68 | £0.06 | +0.04% |
| AXB.IL | £71.40 | -0.28% | 44.3B | 29.26 | £2.44 | +0.08% |
| AXB.L | £44.80 | N/A | 27.8B | 8.48 | £5.28 | N/A |
| AIBG.L | £598.00 | +2.75% | 12.8B | 7.87 | £0.76 | +4.34% |
| BIRG.L | £12.18 | +1.33% | 11.9B | 8.58 | £1.42 | +5.13% |
Stock Comparison
0JW2.L vs 0O84.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0O84.L has a market cap of 276B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0O84.L trades at £186.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0O84.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0O84.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0O84.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0KEF.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0KEF.L has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0KEF.L trades at £177.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0KEF.L's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KEF.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to 0KEF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs SBID.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SBID.L has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while SBID.L trades at £63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SBID.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBID.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to SBID.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs SANB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SANB.L has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while SANB.L trades at £153.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SANB.L's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANB.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to SANB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs LLOY.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, LLOY.L has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while LLOY.L trades at £76.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas LLOY.L's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLOY.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to LLOY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs AXB.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AXB.IL has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while AXB.IL trades at £71.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas AXB.IL's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to AXB.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs AXB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AXB.L has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while AXB.L trades at £44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas AXB.L's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXB.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to AXB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs AIBG.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, AIBG.L has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while AIBG.L trades at £598.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas AIBG.L's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIBG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to AIBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs BIRG.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BIRG.L has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while BIRG.L trades at £12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas BIRG.L's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIRG.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to BIRG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs VTBR.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VTBR.L has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while VTBR.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas VTBR.L's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTBR.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to VTBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs HSBK.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HSBK.IL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while HSBK.IL trades at £22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas HSBK.IL's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBK.IL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to HSBK.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs FEDS.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, FEDS.L has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while FEDS.L trades at £0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas FEDS.L's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FEDS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to FEDS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs TCS.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TCS.IL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while TCS.IL trades at £25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas TCS.IL's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCS.IL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to TCS.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs CBKD.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CBKD.IL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while CBKD.IL trades at £1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CBKD.IL's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBKD.IL's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to CBKD.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs CBKD.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CBKD.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while CBKD.L trades at £1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CBKD.L's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBKD.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to CBKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs NLB.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NLB.IL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while NLB.IL trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas NLB.IL's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLB.IL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to NLB.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs BGEO.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BGEO.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while BGEO.L trades at £6,725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas BGEO.L's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGEO.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to BGEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs VMUK.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VMUK.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while VMUK.L trades at £217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas VMUK.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMUK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to VMUK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0EFW.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0EFW.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0EFW.L trades at £12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0EFW.L's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0EFW.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to 0EFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs XD5D.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, XD5D.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while XD5D.L trades at £84.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas XD5D.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XD5D.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to XD5D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs TBCG.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, TBCG.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while TBCG.L trades at £4,510.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas TBCG.L's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBCG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to TBCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs HSBK.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, HSBK.L has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while HSBK.L trades at £8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas HSBK.L's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSBK.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to HSBK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0RE6.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0RE6.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0RE6.L trades at £125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0RE6.L's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RE6.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0RE6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0RMP.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0RMP.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0RMP.L trades at £242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0RMP.L's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RMP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0RMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs BOCH.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, BOCH.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while BOCH.L trades at £375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas BOCH.L's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOCH.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to BOCH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs NBS.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NBS.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while NBS.L trades at £130.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas NBS.L's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to NBS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs IL0A.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, IL0A.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while IL0A.L trades at £2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas IL0A.L's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IL0A.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to IL0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QLT.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QLT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QLT.L trades at £1,747.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QLT.L's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0QLT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs NLB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, NLB.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while NLB.L trades at £11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas NLB.L's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to NLB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs PTSB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, PTSB.L has a market cap of 991.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while PTSB.L trades at £1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas PTSB.L's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTSB.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to PTSB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs MTRO.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MTRO.L has a market cap of 756.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while MTRO.L trades at £112.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas MTRO.L's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTRO.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to MTRO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QS4.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QS4.L has a market cap of 608M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QS4.L trades at £152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QS4.L's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QS4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L and 0QS4.L have similar daily volatility (0.99).
0JW2.L vs 0QQ4.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QQ4.L has a market cap of 527.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QQ4.L trades at £936.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QQ4.L's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QQ4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0QQ4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QLU.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QLU.L has a market cap of 385.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QLU.L trades at £75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QLU.L's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0QLU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QKG.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QKG.L has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QKG.L trades at £3,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QKG.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QKG.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to 0QKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QLK.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QLK.L has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QLK.L trades at £4,120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QLK.L's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0QLK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0QV3.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0QV3.L has a market cap of 288.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0QV3.L trades at £21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0QV3.L's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QV3.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to 0QV3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs 0ROV.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, 0ROV.L has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while 0ROV.L trades at £55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas 0ROV.L's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0ROV.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to 0ROV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs ARBB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ARBB.L has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while ARBB.L trades at £950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas ARBB.L's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARBB.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to ARBB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs STB.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, STB.L has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while STB.L trades at £750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas STB.L's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to STB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs MFX.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, MFX.L has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while MFX.L trades at £22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas MFX.L's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFX.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to MFX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs SBER.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, SBER.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while SBER.IL trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas SBER.IL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBER.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is more volatile compared to SBER.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs CIHL.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, CIHL.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while CIHL.L trades at £26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas CIHL.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIHL.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to CIHL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs VTBR.IL Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, VTBR.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while VTBR.IL trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas VTBR.IL's P/E ratio is 1.33. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTBR.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0JW2.L has daily volatility of 0.99 and VTBR.IL has daily volatility of N/A.
0JW2.L vs ATMA.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, ATMA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while ATMA.L trades at £0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas ATMA.L's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATMA.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to ATMA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.
0JW2.L vs JEO.L Comparison
0JW2.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JW2.L stands at 29.8B. In comparison, JEO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JW2.L is priced at £185.36, while JEO.L trades at £843.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JW2.L currently has a P/E ratio of 14.16, whereas JEO.L's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, 0JW2.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JEO.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JW2.L is less volatile compared to JEO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JW2.L.