The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (0JTM.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0JTM.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0JTM.L | £90.69 | +0.67% | 33.7B | 10.13 | £9.15 | +1.85% |
| ULVR.L | £4,508.00 | -0.51% | 110.2B | 23.18 | £1.94 | +3.20% |
| 0P59.L | £83.61 | +0.86% | 66.9B | 34.28 | £2.41 | +2.47% |
| 0JQZ.L | £133.23 | -0.05% | 44B | 25.58 | £5.18 | +3.74% |
| RKT.L | £5,546.00 | -0.43% | 37.8B | 30.45 | £1.83 | +3.63% |
| 0R13.L | £91.69 | -2.00% | 22.6B | 28.09 | £3.27 | +1.27% |
| 0I0J.L | £124.13 | -1.90% | 15.2B | 33.42 | £3.70 | +3.91% |
| 0I4A.L | £4.77 | +1.49% | 4.1B | 27.96 | £0.17 | N/A |
| PZC.L | £69.00 | +0.00% | 289.4M | -34.50 | -£0.02 | +2.17% |
| W7L.L | £355.78 | +0.22% | 282.8M | 15.22 | £0.23 | +3.14% |
Stock Comparison
0JTM.L vs ULVR.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, ULVR.L has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while ULVR.L trades at £4,508.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas ULVR.L's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ULVR.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to ULVR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check ULVR.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs 0P59.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, 0P59.L has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while 0P59.L trades at £83.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas 0P59.L's P/E ratio is 34.28. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0P59.L's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to 0P59.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check 0P59.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs 0JQZ.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, 0JQZ.L has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while 0JQZ.L trades at £133.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas 0JQZ.L's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0JQZ.L's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to 0JQZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check 0JQZ.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs RKT.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, RKT.L has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while RKT.L trades at £5,546.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas RKT.L's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RKT.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to RKT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check RKT.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs 0R13.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, 0R13.L has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while 0R13.L trades at £91.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas 0R13.L's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0R13.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to 0R13.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check 0R13.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs 0I0J.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, 0I0J.L has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while 0I0J.L trades at £124.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas 0I0J.L's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0I0J.L's ROE of +8.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to 0I0J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check 0I0J.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs 0I4A.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, 0I4A.L has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while 0I4A.L trades at £4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas 0I4A.L's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0I4A.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to 0I4A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check 0I4A.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs PZC.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, PZC.L has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while PZC.L trades at £69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas PZC.L's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PZC.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is less volatile compared to PZC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check PZC.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs W7L.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, W7L.L has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while W7L.L trades at £355.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas W7L.L's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to W7L.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is less volatile compared to W7L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check W7L.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs MCB.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, MCB.L has a market cap of 211M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while MCB.L trades at £123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas MCB.L's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MCB.L's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to MCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check MCB.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs ACRL.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, ACRL.L has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while ACRL.L trades at £39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas ACRL.L's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ACRL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to ACRL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check ACRL.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs CRL.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, CRL.L has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while CRL.L trades at £36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CRL.L's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRL.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is less volatile compared to CRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check CRL.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs BAR.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, BAR.L has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while BAR.L trades at £47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BAR.L's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BAR.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to BAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check BAR.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs REVB.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, REVB.L has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while REVB.L trades at £3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas REVB.L's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to REVB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is less volatile compared to REVB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check REVB.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs CLAI.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, CLAI.L has a market cap of 959.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while CLAI.L trades at £0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas CLAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CLAI.L's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is less volatile compared to CLAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check CLAI.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs BYOT.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, BYOT.L has a market cap of 453.9K. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while BYOT.L trades at £0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas BYOT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BYOT.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to BYOT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check BYOT.L's competition here
0JTM.L vs IDP.L Comparison August 2025
0JTM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0JTM.L stands at 33.7B. In comparison, IDP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0JTM.L is priced at £90.69, while IDP.L trades at £29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0JTM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 10.13, whereas IDP.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 0JTM.L's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IDP.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JTM.L is more volatile compared to IDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JTM.L.Check IDP.L's competition here