Juniper Networks, Inc.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0K3H.L has a market cap of 69.41B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0K3H.L trades at $415.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0K3H.L's P/E ratio is 56.96. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0K3H.L's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0K3H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0RPZ.L has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0RPZ.L trades at $430.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0RPZ.L's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RPZ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0RPZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0LI9.L has a market cap of 18.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0LI9.L trades at $363.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0LI9.L's P/E ratio is 51.38. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LI9.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to 0LI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0HYA.L has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0HYA.L trades at $75.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0HYA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0HYA.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0HYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0RDH.L has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0RDH.L trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0RDH.L's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0RDH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0RDH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0JVV.L has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0JVV.L trades at $67.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0JVV.L's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0JVV.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0JVV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0IJW.L has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0IJW.L trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0IJW.L's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0IJW.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0IJW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, ETL.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while ETL.L trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas ETL.L's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETL.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to ETL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0QNH.L has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0QNH.L trades at $74.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0QNH.L's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QNH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0QNH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0LPE.L has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0LPE.L trades at $9.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0LPE.L's P/E ratio is -42.78. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0LPE.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0LPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0J38.L has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0J38.L trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0J38.L's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0J38.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0J38.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0H14.L has a market cap of 950.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0H14.L trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0H14.L's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0H14.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0H14.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0QNI.L has a market cap of 620.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0QNI.L trades at $115.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0QNI.L's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QNI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to 0QNI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0NQJ.L has a market cap of 500.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0NQJ.L trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0NQJ.L's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0NQJ.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to 0NQJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, FTC.L has a market cap of 258.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while FTC.L trades at $118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas FTC.L's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTC.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to FTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0OPY.L has a market cap of 215.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0OPY.L trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0OPY.L's P/E ratio is -109.69. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0OPY.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0OPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0A52.L has a market cap of 122.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0A52.L trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0A52.L's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0A52.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0A52.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0QSV.L has a market cap of 88.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0QSV.L trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0QSV.L's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QSV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to 0QSV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0QVW.L has a market cap of 46.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0QVW.L trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0QVW.L's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0QVW.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to 0QVW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, CLX.L has a market cap of 43.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while CLX.L trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas CLX.L's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to CLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, MWE.L has a market cap of 40.08M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while MWE.L trades at $46.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas MWE.L's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MWE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to MWE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, CYAN.L has a market cap of 27.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while CYAN.L trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas CYAN.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYAN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to CYAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, PEB.L has a market cap of 9.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while PEB.L trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas PEB.L's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEB.L's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to PEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, GINV.L has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while GINV.L trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas GINV.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GINV.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is more volatile compared to GINV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, 0DO7.L has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while 0DO7.L trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas 0DO7.L's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0DO7.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to 0DO7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.

0JPH.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0JPH.L stands at 12.16B. In comparison, TCM.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0JPH.L is priced at $36.36, while TCM.L trades at $229.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0JPH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 35.51, whereas TCM.L's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, 0JPH.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCM.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0JPH.L is less volatile compared to TCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0JPH.L.