Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 0J51.L Peers
See (0J51.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0J51.L | $17.90 | -0.04% | 23.52B | 6.43 | $2.79 | +2.89% |
| MAW.L | $44,640.00 | -1.67% | 380.32B | 28.62 | $1,559.52 | +0.27% |
| 0HFB.L | $86.24 | +1.73% | 99.52B | 32.01 | $2.69 | +0.70% |
| 0Z4I.L | $71.05 | +7.98% | 77.11B | 13.30 | $5.34 | +0.32% |
| HHPD.L | $6.98 | N/A | 50.09B | 9.43 | $0.74 | +0.15% |
| 0R2X.L | $47.92 | +2.90% | 41.04B | 38.09 | $1.26 | +2.34% |
| 0J2E.L | $28.69 | +1.30% | 25.27B | 5.12 | $5.60 | +3.94% |
| 0K6F.L | $99.71 | +1.54% | 19.58B | 24.38 | $4.09 | +2.09% |
| 0QZF.L | $49.09 | +4.63% | 17.13B | 8.50 | $5.78 | N/A |
| 0KSA.L | $54.34 | +2.08% | 16.30B | -222.69 | -$0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0J51.L vs MAW.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, MAW.L has a market cap of 380.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while MAW.L trades at $44,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas MAW.L's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to MAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0HFB.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0HFB.L has a market cap of 99.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0HFB.L trades at $86.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0HFB.L's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0HFB.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0HFB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0Z4I.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0Z4I.L has a market cap of 77.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0Z4I.L trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0Z4I.L's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0Z4I.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs HHPD.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, HHPD.L has a market cap of 50.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while HHPD.L trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas HHPD.L's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HHPD.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to HHPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0R2X.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0R2X.L has a market cap of 41.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0R2X.L trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0R2X.L's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0R2X.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0R2X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0J2E.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0J2E.L has a market cap of 25.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0J2E.L trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0J2E.L's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0J2E.L's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0J2E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0K6F.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0K6F.L has a market cap of 19.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0K6F.L trades at $99.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0K6F.L's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0K6F.L's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0K6F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QZF.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QZF.L has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QZF.L trades at $49.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QZF.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QZF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0QZF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0KSA.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0KSA.L has a market cap of 16.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0KSA.L trades at $54.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0KSA.L's P/E ratio is -222.69. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0KSA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0KSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0F0J.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0F0J.L has a market cap of 11.40B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0F0J.L trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0F0J.L's P/E ratio is 67.04. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0F0J.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0F0J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0LHO.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0LHO.L has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0LHO.L trades at $64.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0LHO.L's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0LHO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0LHO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0LJE.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0LJE.L has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0LJE.L trades at $154.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0LJE.L's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0LJE.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0LJE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0HI1.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0HI1.L has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0HI1.L trades at $122.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0HI1.L's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0HI1.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0HI1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0I14.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0I14.L has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0I14.L trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0I14.L's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0I14.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0I14.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0VAG.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0VAG.L has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0VAG.L trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0VAG.L's P/E ratio is 80.94. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0VAG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0VAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QLW.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QLW.L has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QLW.L trades at $271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QLW.L's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QLW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0QLW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0J86.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0J86.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0J86.L trades at $59.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0J86.L's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0J86.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0J86.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0YQA.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0YQA.L has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0YQA.L trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0YQA.L's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0YQA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0YQA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QK5.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QK5.L has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QK5.L trades at $100.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QK5.L's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QK5.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0QK5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs SXS.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, SXS.L has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while SXS.L trades at $2,216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas SXS.L's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SXS.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to SXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs RSW.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, RSW.L has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while RSW.L trades at $2,755.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas RSW.L's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSW.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to RSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0ROQ.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0ROQ.L has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0ROQ.L trades at $242.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0ROQ.L's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0ROQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0ROQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0GEG.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0GEG.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0GEG.L trades at $49.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0GEG.L's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0GEG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0GEG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0RTL.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0RTL.L has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0RTL.L trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0RTL.L's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0RTL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0RTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0M58.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0M58.L has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0M58.L trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0M58.L's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0M58.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0M58.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0ZPV.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0ZPV.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0ZPV.L trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0ZPV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0ZPV.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0ZPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QHK.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QHK.L has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QHK.L trades at $77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QHK.L's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QHK.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0QHK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0JI9.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0JI9.L has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0JI9.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0JI9.L's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0JI9.L's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0JI9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0SE5.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0SE5.L has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0SE5.L trades at $73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0SE5.L's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0SE5.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0SE5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs RPI.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, RPI.L has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while RPI.L trades at $518.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas RPI.L's P/E ratio is 103.60. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to RPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0H38.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0H38.L has a market cap of 974.90M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0H38.L trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0H38.L's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0H38.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0H38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QKB.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QKB.L has a market cap of 886.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QKB.L trades at $778.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QKB.L's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QKB.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0QKB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QDT.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QDT.L has a market cap of 615.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QDT.L trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QDT.L's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QDT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0QDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs DSCV.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, DSCV.L has a market cap of 606.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while DSCV.L trades at $631.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas DSCV.L's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSCV.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to DSCV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QPR.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QPR.L has a market cap of 540.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QPR.L trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QPR.L's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QPR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0QPR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs JDG.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, JDG.L has a market cap of 524.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while JDG.L trades at $7,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas JDG.L's P/E ratio is 51.30. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to JDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0IF4.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0IF4.L has a market cap of 513.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0IF4.L trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0IF4.L's P/E ratio is 198.79. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0IF4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0IF4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0H0U.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0H0U.L has a market cap of 497.53M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0H0U.L trades at $41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0H0U.L's P/E ratio is 817.65. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0H0U.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0H0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0NNU.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0NNU.L has a market cap of 428.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0NNU.L trades at $65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0NNU.L's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0NNU.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0NNU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0OC9.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0OC9.L has a market cap of 345.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0OC9.L trades at $53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0OC9.L's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0OC9.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0OC9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0DUI.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0DUI.L has a market cap of 280.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0DUI.L trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0DUI.L's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0DUI.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0DUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0FRI.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0FRI.L has a market cap of 266.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0FRI.L trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0FRI.L's P/E ratio is 62.69. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0FRI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0FRI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0NFS.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0NFS.L has a market cap of 260.57M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0NFS.L trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0NFS.L's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0NFS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0NFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0K17.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0K17.L has a market cap of 258.08M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0K17.L trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0K17.L's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0K17.L's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0K17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0K6M.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0K6M.L has a market cap of 221.03M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0K6M.L trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0K6M.L's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0K6M.L's ROE of +50.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0K6M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0MTP.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0MTP.L has a market cap of 221.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0MTP.L trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0MTP.L's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0MTP.L's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0MTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0Y2A.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0Y2A.L has a market cap of 159.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0Y2A.L trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0Y2A.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0Y2A.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to 0Y2A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs SRT.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, SRT.L has a market cap of 155.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while SRT.L trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas SRT.L's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRT.L's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to SRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs TTG.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, TTG.L has a market cap of 151.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while TTG.L trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas TTG.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTG.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to TTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs QTX.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, QTX.L has a market cap of 120.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while QTX.L trades at $248.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas QTX.L's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to QTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs GHH.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, GHH.L has a market cap of 113.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while GHH.L trades at $440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas GHH.L's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHH.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to GHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs SOLI.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, SOLI.L has a market cap of 109.08M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while SOLI.L trades at $192.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas SOLI.L's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOLI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to SOLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs KETL.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, KETL.L has a market cap of 107.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while KETL.L trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas KETL.L's P/E ratio is 46.65. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KETL.L's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to KETL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs XAR.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, XAR.L has a market cap of 80.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while XAR.L trades at $102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas XAR.L's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XAR.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to XAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0QNQ.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0QNQ.L has a market cap of 66.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0QNQ.L trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0QNQ.L's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0QNQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0QNQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs SDI.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, SDI.L has a market cap of 61.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while SDI.L trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas SDI.L's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to SDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0OJJ.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0OJJ.L has a market cap of 57.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0OJJ.L trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0OJJ.L's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0OJJ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0OJJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs WPHO.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, WPHO.L has a market cap of 51.07M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while WPHO.L trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas WPHO.L's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPHO.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to WPHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs KMK.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, KMK.L has a market cap of 38.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while KMK.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas KMK.L's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to KMK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0I0B.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0I0B.L has a market cap of 29.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0I0B.L trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0I0B.L's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0I0B.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0I0B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs LST.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, LST.L has a market cap of 12.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while LST.L trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas LST.L's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LST.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to LST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs 0IH3.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, 0IH3.L has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while 0IH3.L trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas 0IH3.L's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to 0IH3.L's ROE of -7.73%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to 0IH3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs CPX.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, CPX.L has a market cap of 8.52M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while CPX.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas CPX.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPX.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to CPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs STAR.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, STAR.L has a market cap of 8.50M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while STAR.L trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas STAR.L's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STAR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to STAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs ZYT.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, ZYT.L has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while ZYT.L trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas ZYT.L's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZYT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to ZYT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs TRAK.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, TRAK.L has a market cap of 4.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while TRAK.L trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas TRAK.L's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRAK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to TRAK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs HDT.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, HDT.L has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while HDT.L trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas HDT.L's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HDT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to HDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs NNN.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, NNN.L has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while NNN.L trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas NNN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NNN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0J51.L has daily volatility of 1.61 and NNN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0J51.L vs MSYS.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, MSYS.L has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while MSYS.L trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas MSYS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSYS.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to MSYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs TRAC.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, TRAC.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while TRAC.L trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas TRAC.L's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRAC.L's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is less volatile compared to TRAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs TWD.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, TWD.L has a market cap of 899262.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while TWD.L trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas TWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWD.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to TWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.
0J51.L vs PIP.L Comparison
0J51.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0J51.L stands at 23.52B. In comparison, PIP.L has a market cap of 581005.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0J51.L is priced at $17.90, while PIP.L trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0J51.L currently has a P/E ratio of 6.43, whereas PIP.L's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 0J51.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0J51.L is more volatile compared to PIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0J51.L.