Fastenal Company
Fastenal Company (0IKW.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0IKW.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0IKW.L | £45.24 | -2.25% | 51.9B | 26.61 | £1.70 | +1.87% |
| 0IZI.L | £936.32 | -10.45% | 49.8B | 41.77 | £22.42 | +0.90% |
| FERG.L | £16,640.00 | -1.71% | 32.8B | 27.78 | £5.99 | +1.24% |
| 0QRA.L | £95.42 | -3.16% | 18.1B | 7.04 | £13.56 | +52.99% |
| DPLM.L | £5,350.00 | -0.56% | 7.2B | 43.15 | £1.24 | +1.13% |
| 0RTK.L | £104.00 | -1.33% | 5.2B | 12.23 | £8.50 | +1.93% |
| RS1.L | £548.00 | -1.97% | 2.6B | 16.61 | £0.33 | +4.09% |
| 0RNT.L | £93.50 | +2.30% | 2.6B | 10.05 | £9.30 | +3.23% |
| GFTU.L | £884.90 | -0.57% | 1.7B | 12.64 | £0.70 | +4.18% |
| 0K9J.L | £15.87 | +4.21% | 1.7B | 39.00 | £0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0IKW.L vs 0IZI.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0IZI.L has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0IZI.L trades at £936.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0IZI.L's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0IZI.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to 0IZI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0IZI.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs FERG.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FERG.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while FERG.L trades at £16,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas FERG.L's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FERG.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to FERG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check FERG.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0QRA.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0QRA.L has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0QRA.L trades at £95.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0QRA.L's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0QRA.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0QRA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0QRA.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs DPLM.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, DPLM.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while DPLM.L trades at £5,350.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas DPLM.L's P/E ratio is 43.15. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DPLM.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to DPLM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check DPLM.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0RTK.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0RTK.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0RTK.L trades at £104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0RTK.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0RTK.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0RTK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0RTK.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs RS1.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, RS1.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while RS1.L trades at £548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas RS1.L's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RS1.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to RS1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check RS1.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0RNT.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0RNT.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0RNT.L trades at £93.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0RNT.L's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0RNT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0RNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0RNT.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs GFTU.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, GFTU.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while GFTU.L trades at £884.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas GFTU.L's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GFTU.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to GFTU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check GFTU.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0K9J.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0K9J.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0K9J.L trades at £15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0K9J.L's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0K9J.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0K9J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0K9J.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0AH7.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0AH7.L has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0AH7.L trades at £9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0AH7.L's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0AH7.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0AH7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0AH7.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs LTHP.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, LTHP.L has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while LTHP.L trades at £122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas LTHP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LTHP.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to LTHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check LTHP.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs BRCK.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BRCK.L has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while BRCK.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas BRCK.L's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRCK.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to BRCK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check BRCK.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs SHI.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SHI.L has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while SHI.L trades at £14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas SHI.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SHI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to SHI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check SHI.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs LORD.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, LORD.L has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while LORD.L trades at £45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas LORD.L's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LORD.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to LORD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check LORD.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs FLO.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, FLO.L has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while FLO.L trades at £61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas FLO.L's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLO.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to FLO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check FLO.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs BMTO.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BMTO.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while BMTO.L trades at £1,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas BMTO.L's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BMTO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to BMTO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check BMTO.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs BMT.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, BMT.L has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while BMT.L trades at £900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas BMT.L's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BMT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is less volatile compared to BMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check BMT.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs SLNG.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, SLNG.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while SLNG.L trades at £200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas SLNG.L's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLNG.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to SLNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check SLNG.L's competition here
0IKW.L vs 0RR3.L Comparison August 2025
0IKW.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0IKW.L stands at 51.9B. In comparison, 0RR3.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0IKW.L is priced at £45.24, while 0RR3.L trades at £143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0IKW.L currently has a P/E ratio of 26.61, whereas 0RR3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IKW.L's ROE is +0.32%, compared to 0RR3.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IKW.L is more volatile compared to 0RR3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IKW.L.Check 0RR3.L's competition here