Dollar General Corporation

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0R1O.IL has a market cap of 2.04T. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0R1O.IL trades at $192.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0R1O.IL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R1O.IL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0R1O.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0JVQ.L has a market cap of 124.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0JVQ.L trades at $222.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0JVQ.L's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0JVQ.L's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0JVQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0K0E.L has a market cap of 124.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0K0E.L trades at $2,447.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0K0E.L's P/E ratio is 670.26. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0K0E.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0K0E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0KAB.L has a market cap of 77.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0KAB.L trades at $1,353.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0KAB.L's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0KAB.L's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0KAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0HJL.L has a market cap of 61.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0HJL.L trades at $3,650.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0HJL.L's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HJL.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0HJL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0KXO.L has a market cap of 47.01B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0KXO.L trades at $142.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0KXO.L's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0KXO.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0KXO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0LD8.L has a market cap of 43.92B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0LD8.L trades at $96.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0LD8.L's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0LD8.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0LD8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0R3D.L has a market cap of 32.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0R3D.L trades at $69.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0R3D.L's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R3D.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0R3D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0LXC.L has a market cap of 19.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0LXC.L trades at $160.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0LXC.L's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0LXC.L's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0LXC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IC8.L has a market cap of 18.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IC8.L trades at $86.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IC8.L's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IC8.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0IC8.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0LIB.L has a market cap of 17.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0LIB.L trades at $391.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0LIB.L's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0LIB.L's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0LIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IUX.L has a market cap of 16.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IUX.L trades at $118.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IUX.L's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IUX.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0IUX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0R18.L has a market cap of 14.61B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0R18.L trades at $69.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0R18.L's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R18.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0R18.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0HTQ.L has a market cap of 10.07B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0HTQ.L trades at $65.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0HTQ.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HTQ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0HTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0QVE.L has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0QVE.L trades at $590.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0QVE.L's P/E ratio is 132.49. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QVE.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0QVE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0JSC.L has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0JSC.L trades at $31.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0JSC.L's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0JSC.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0JSC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0RCW.L has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0RCW.L trades at $158.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0RCW.L's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0RCW.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0RCW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IIW.L has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IIW.L trades at $46.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IIW.L's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IIW.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0IIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IPD.L has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IPD.L trades at $85.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IPD.L's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IPD.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0IPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, JD.L has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while JD.L trades at $86.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas JD.L's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to JD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0SOM.L has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0SOM.L trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0SOM.L's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0SOM.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0SOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, DFIB.L has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while DFIB.L trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas DFIB.L's P/E ratio is -50.94. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFIB.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to DFIB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0R32.L has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0R32.L trades at $73.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0R32.L's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0R32.L's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0R32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0KTF.L has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0KTF.L trades at $191.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0KTF.L's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0KTF.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0KTF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, FRAS.L has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while FRAS.L trades at $690.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas FRAS.L's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRAS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to FRAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, ROO.L has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while ROO.L trades at $174.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas ROO.L's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to ROO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, JET.L has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while JET.L trades at $1,134.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas JET.L's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JET.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to JET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, DNLM.L has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while DNLM.L trades at $1,148.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas DNLM.L's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNLM.L's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to DNLM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0H9G.L has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0H9G.L trades at $31.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0H9G.L's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0H9G.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0H9G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0QK3.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0QK3.L trades at $35.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0QK3.L's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0QK3.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0QK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0HSU.L has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0HSU.L trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0HSU.L's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0HSU.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0HSU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, CURY.L has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while CURY.L trades at $118.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas CURY.L's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURY.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to CURY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, SMWH.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while SMWH.L trades at $961.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas SMWH.L's P/E ratio is 240.25. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMWH.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to SMWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IQK.L has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IQK.L trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IQK.L's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IQK.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0IQK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, PETS.L has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while PETS.L trades at $247.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas PETS.L's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PETS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to PETS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MOON.L has a market cap of 804.79M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MOON.L trades at $241.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MOON.L's P/E ratio is -40.25. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOON.L's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to MOON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0JRL.L has a market cap of 772.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0JRL.L trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0JRL.L's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0JRL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0JRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, AO.L has a market cap of 553.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while AO.L trades at $97.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas AO.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to AO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, BOO.L has a market cap of 364.67M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while BOO.L trades at $26.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas BOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOO.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to BOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, HFD.L has a market cap of 351.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while HFD.L trades at $160.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas HFD.L's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HFD.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to HFD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, THG.L has a market cap of 348.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while THG.L trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas THG.L's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to THG.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to THG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0RA5.L has a market cap of 342.60M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0RA5.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0RA5.L's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0RA5.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0RA5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, CARD.L has a market cap of 338.72M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while CARD.L trades at $96.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas CARD.L's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CARD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to CARD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, ASC.L has a market cap of 333.12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while ASC.L trades at $279.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas ASC.L's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASC.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to ASC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, DEBS.L has a market cap of 299.55M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while DEBS.L trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas DEBS.L's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEBS.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to DEBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0KDU.L has a market cap of 278.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0KDU.L trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0KDU.L's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0KDU.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0KDU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0ROF.L has a market cap of 229.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0ROF.L trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0ROF.L's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0ROF.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0ROF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, BWNG.L has a market cap of 185.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while BWNG.L trades at $39.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas BWNG.L's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWNG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to BWNG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0OQX.L has a market cap of 132.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0OQX.L trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0OQX.L's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0OQX.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0OQX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, SCS.L has a market cap of 95.56M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while SCS.L trades at $270.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas SCS.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to SCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0RP3.L has a market cap of 89.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0RP3.L trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0RP3.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0RP3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0RP3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MRK.L has a market cap of 61.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MRK.L trades at $58.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MRK.L's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRK.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to MRK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, IGR.L has a market cap of 58.85M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while IGR.L trades at $60.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas IGR.L's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to IGR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, PROC.L has a market cap of 38.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while PROC.L trades at $35.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas PROC.L's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROC.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to PROC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, ANG.L has a market cap of 29.42M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while ANG.L trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas ANG.L's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to ANG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, G4M.L has a market cap of 29.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while G4M.L trades at $138.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas G4M.L's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to G4M.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to G4M.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, HRN.L has a market cap of 26.65M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while HRN.L trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas HRN.L's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HRN.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to HRN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, SOS.L has a market cap of 18.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while SOS.L trades at $7.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas SOS.L's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to SOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, WRKS.L has a market cap of 16.69M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while WRKS.L trades at $26.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas WRKS.L's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRKS.L's ROE of +1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to WRKS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MTC.L has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MTC.L trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MTC.L's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to MTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, PODP.L has a market cap of 9.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while PODP.L trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas PODP.L's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PODP.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to PODP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MMAG.L has a market cap of 8.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MMAG.L trades at $8.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MMAG.L's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMAG.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to MMAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, SCHO.L has a market cap of 5.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while SCHO.L trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas SCHO.L's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to SCHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0DQK.L has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0DQK.L trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0DQK.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0DQK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0DQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, DISP.L has a market cap of 1.25M. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while DISP.L trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas DISP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DISP.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to DISP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, UBG.L has a market cap of 488670.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while UBG.L trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas UBG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBG.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to UBG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, ITS.L has a market cap of 406875.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while ITS.L trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas ITS.L's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0IJU.L has a market cap of 749.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0IJU.L trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0IJU.L's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0IJU.L's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is more volatile compared to 0IJU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, SGI.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while SGI.L trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas SGI.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGI.L's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to SGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MADE.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MADE.L trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MADE.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MADE.L's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IC7.L has daily volatility of 1.62 and MADE.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, DC.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while DC.L trades at $137.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas DC.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DC.L's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to DC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MYSL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MYSL.L trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MYSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MYSL.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IC7.L has daily volatility of 1.62 and MYSL.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, MEAL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while MEAL.L trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas MEAL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEAL.L's ROE of -41.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0IC7.L has daily volatility of 1.62 and MEAL.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, 0M1U.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while 0M1U.L trades at $72.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas 0M1U.L's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 0M1U.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to 0M1U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.

0IC7.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0IC7.L stands at 20.27B. In comparison, STU.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0IC7.L is priced at $92.16, while STU.L trades at $115.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0IC7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.45, whereas STU.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0IC7.L's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STU.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0IC7.L is less volatile compared to STU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0IC7.L.