Darden Restaurants, Inc.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0HXW.L has a market cap of 67.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0HXW.L trades at $49.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0HXW.L's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0HXW.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to 0HXW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, CPG.L has a market cap of 44.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while CPG.L trades at $2,605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas CPG.L's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CPG.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to CPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0VFA.L has a market cap of 42.68B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0VFA.L trades at $94.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0VFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0VFA.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and 0VFA.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0QKI.L has a market cap of 26.74B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0QKI.L trades at $516.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0QKI.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0QKI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to 0QKI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0M30.L has a market cap of 16.55B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0M30.L trades at $44.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0M30.L's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0M30.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to 0M30.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, MAB.L has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while MAB.L trades at $267.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas MAB.L's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MAB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to MAB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, SSPG.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while SSPG.L trades at $161.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas SSPG.L's P/E ratio is 53.77. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SSPG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to SSPG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, DOM.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while DOM.L trades at $265.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas DOM.L's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DOM.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to DOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, JDW.L has a market cap of 801.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while JDW.L trades at $725.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas JDW.L's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to JDW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to JDW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, YNGA.L has a market cap of 505.53M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while YNGA.L trades at $953.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas YNGA.L's P/E ratio is 45.38. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to YNGA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to YNGA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, YNGN.L has a market cap of 502.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while YNGN.L trades at $628.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas YNGN.L's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to YNGN.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to YNGN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, RTN.L has a market cap of 499.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while RTN.L trades at $64.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas RTN.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RTN.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I77.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and RTN.L has daily volatility of N/A.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0KT6.L has a market cap of 380.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0KT6.L trades at $42.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0KT6.L's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0KT6.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to 0KT6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, LGRS.L has a market cap of 352.48M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while LGRS.L trades at $324.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas LGRS.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LGRS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to LGRS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 53GW.L has a market cap of 320.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 53GW.L trades at $88.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 53GW.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 53GW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and 53GW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, FSTA.L has a market cap of 307.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while FSTA.L trades at $578.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas FSTA.L's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FSTA.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to FSTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, DPEU.L has a market cap of 287.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while DPEU.L trades at $190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas DPEU.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DPEU.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and DPEU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, MARS.L has a market cap of 259.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while MARS.L trades at $40.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas MARS.L's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MARS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to MARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, CPC.L has a market cap of 153.75M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while CPC.L trades at $139.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas CPC.L's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CPC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and CPC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, FUL.L has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while FUL.L trades at $14.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas FUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FUL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and FUL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, DPP.L has a market cap of 84.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while DPP.L trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas DPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DPP.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to DPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 54GW.L has a market cap of 63.26M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 54GW.L trades at $104.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 54GW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 54GW.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and 54GW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, VARE.L has a market cap of 23.63M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while VARE.L trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas VARE.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to VARE.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and VARE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, MEX.L has a market cap of 13.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while MEX.L trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas MEX.L's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MEX.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to MEX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, RBG.L has a market cap of 11.98M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while RBG.L trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas RBG.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RBG.L's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to RBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, HVTA.L has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while HVTA.L trades at $175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas HVTA.L's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HVTA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to HVTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, HVT.L has a market cap of 8.11M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while HVT.L trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas HVT.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HVT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and HVT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, NGHT.L has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while NGHT.L trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas NGHT.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NGHT.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to NGHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, PIER.L has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while PIER.L trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas PIER.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PIER.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and PIER.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, COM.L has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while COM.L trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas COM.L's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to COM.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to COM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, TAST.L has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while TAST.L trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas TAST.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TAST.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L is less volatile compared to TAST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I77.L.

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, DVT.L has a market cap of 567375.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while DVT.L trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas DVT.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DVT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and DVT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, MORE.L has a market cap of 195497.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while MORE.L trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas MORE.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MORE.L's ROE of -16.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and MORE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 0RR0.L has a market cap of 122506.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 0RR0.L trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 0RR0.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 0RR0.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and 0RR0.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, 92IP.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while 92IP.L trades at $95.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas 92IP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to 92IP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I77.L and 92IP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).

0I77.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0I77.L stands at 23.06B. In comparison, HVTB.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I77.L is priced at $197.08, while HVTB.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0I77.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.78, whereas HVTB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0I77.L's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HVTB.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I77.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and HVTB.L has daily volatility of N/A.