D.R. Horton, Inc.
D.R. Horton, Inc. 0I6K.L Peers
See (0I6K.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0I6K.L vs 0LCE.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LCE.L has a market cap of 142.73B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LCE.L trades at $127.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LCE.L's P/E ratio is 46.39. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LCE.L's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0LCE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0JVT.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JVT.L has a market cap of 34.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JVT.L trades at $280.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JVT.L's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JVT.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0JU0.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JU0.L has a market cap of 28.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JU0.L trades at $108.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JU0.L's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JU0.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JU0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0KS6.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0KS6.L has a market cap of 20.53B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0KS6.L trades at $102.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0KS6.L's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0KS6.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0KS6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0LD5.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LD5.L has a market cap of 16.13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LD5.L trades at $77.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LD5.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LD5.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0LD5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0KIZ.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0KIZ.L has a market cap of 15.63B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0KIZ.L trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0KIZ.L's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0KIZ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0KIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0KTS.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0KTS.L has a market cap of 14.64B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0KTS.L trades at $249.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0KTS.L's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0KTS.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0KTS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs NXT.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, NXT.L has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while NXT.L trades at $12,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas NXT.L's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXT.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to NXT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0LFS.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LFS.L has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LFS.L trades at $103.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LFS.L's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LFS.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0LFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0L73.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0L73.L has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0L73.L trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0L73.L's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0L73.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0L73.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0J3K.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0J3K.L has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0J3K.L trades at $62.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0J3K.L's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0J3K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0J3K.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0ITS.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0ITS.L has a market cap of 8.58B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0ITS.L trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0ITS.L's P/E ratio is -118.60. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0ITS.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0ITS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0K2F.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0K2F.L has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0K2F.L trades at $103.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0K2F.L's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0K2F.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0K2F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0JZH.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JZH.L has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JZH.L trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JZH.L's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JZH.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JZH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0RPY.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0RPY.L has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0RPY.L trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0RPY.L's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0RPY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0RPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0R30.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0R30.L has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0R30.L trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0R30.L's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0R30.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0R30.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0HR3.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0HR3.L has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0HR3.L trades at $99.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0HR3.L's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0HR3.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0HR3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0LWH.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LWH.L has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LWH.L trades at $79.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LWH.L's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LWH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0LWH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0KEQ.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0KEQ.L has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0KEQ.L trades at $74.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0KEQ.L's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0KEQ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0KEQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0R2I.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0R2I.L has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0R2I.L trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0R2I.L's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0R2I.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0R2I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0K7J.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0K7J.L has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0K7J.L trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0K7J.L's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0K7J.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0K7J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0KJQ.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0KJQ.L has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0KJQ.L trades at $36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0KJQ.L's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0KJQ.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0KJQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0HQ7.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0HQ7.L has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0HQ7.L trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0HQ7.L's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0HQ7.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0HQ7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0MRM.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0MRM.L has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0MRM.L trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0MRM.L's P/E ratio is -305.58. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0MRM.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0MRM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0J2X.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0J2X.L has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0J2X.L trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0J2X.L's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0J2X.L's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0J2X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0JSI.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JSI.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JSI.L trades at $54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JSI.L's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JSI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0JTT.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JTT.L has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JTT.L trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JTT.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JTT.L's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JTT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0ZFN.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0ZFN.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0ZFN.L trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0ZFN.L's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0ZFN.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0ZFN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0L9Q.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0L9Q.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0L9Q.L trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0L9Q.L's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0L9Q.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0L9Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0QKD.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0QKD.L has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0QKD.L trades at $818.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0QKD.L's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0QKD.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0QKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0RDG.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0RDG.L has a market cap of 676.78M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0RDG.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0RDG.L's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0RDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I6K.L has daily volatility of 1.78 and 0RDG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0I6K.L vs 0JX9.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0JX9.L has a market cap of 492.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0JX9.L trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0JX9.L's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0JX9.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0JX9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0IWV.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0IWV.L has a market cap of 427.79M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0IWV.L trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0IWV.L's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0IWV.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0IWV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0L9X.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0L9X.L has a market cap of 411.35M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0L9X.L trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0L9X.L's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0L9X.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0L9X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0RVA.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0RVA.L has a market cap of 391.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0RVA.L trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0RVA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0RVA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0RVA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0N2H.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0N2H.L has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0N2H.L trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0N2H.L's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0N2H.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0N2H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0N2Q.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0N2Q.L has a market cap of 321.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0N2Q.L trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0N2Q.L's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0N2Q.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0N2Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0ZNF.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0ZNF.L has a market cap of 214.77M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0ZNF.L trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0ZNF.L's P/E ratio is 80.27. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0ZNF.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0ZNF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0F2Z.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0F2Z.L has a market cap of 189.28M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0F2Z.L trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0F2Z.L's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0F2Z.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0F2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0LRL.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LRL.L has a market cap of 134.88M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LRL.L trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LRL.L's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LRL.L's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0LRL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0OGG.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0OGG.L has a market cap of 96.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0OGG.L trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0OGG.L's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0OGG.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0OGG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0R1C.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0R1C.L has a market cap of 95.40M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0R1C.L trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0R1C.L's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0R1C.L's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0R1C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0R38.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0R38.L has a market cap of 84.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0R38.L trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0R38.L's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0R38.L's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to 0R38.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0RQK.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0RQK.L has a market cap of 20.93M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0RQK.L trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0RQK.L's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0RQK.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0RQK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0O0E.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0O0E.L has a market cap of 17.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0O0E.L trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0O0E.L's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0O0E.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0O0E.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs BUMP.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, BUMP.L has a market cap of 15.31M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while BUMP.L trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas BUMP.L's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BUMP.L's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to BUMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0W0T.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0W0T.L has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0W0T.L trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0W0T.L's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0W0T.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0W0T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs QUIZ.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, QUIZ.L has a market cap of 888252.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while QUIZ.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas QUIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QUIZ.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to QUIZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs 0MMJ.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0MMJ.L has a market cap of 344266.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0MMJ.L trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0MMJ.L's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0MMJ.L's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is more volatile compared to 0MMJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
0I6K.L vs JOUL.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, JOUL.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while JOUL.L trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas JOUL.L's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JOUL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I6K.L has daily volatility of 1.78 and JOUL.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0I6K.L vs TED.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, TED.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while TED.L trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas TED.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TED.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I6K.L has daily volatility of 1.78 and TED.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0I6K.L vs 0LN5.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, 0LN5.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while 0LN5.L trades at $178.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas 0LN5.L's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0LN5.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0I6K.L has daily volatility of 1.78 and 0LN5.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0I6K.L vs FCCN.L Comparison
0I6K.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I6K.L stands at 37.53B. In comparison, FCCN.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, 0I6K.L is priced at $122.17, while FCCN.L trades at $29.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I6K.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.76, whereas FCCN.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0I6K.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCCN.L's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I6K.L is less volatile compared to FCCN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I6K.L.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0LCE.L | $127.84 | -0.49% | 142.73B | 46.39 | $2.76 | +1.17% |
0I6K.L | $122.17 | -1.51% | 37.53B | 8.76 | $13.95 | +1.23% |
0JVT.L | $280.64 | -1.12% | 34.15B | 35.65 | $7.87 | N/A |
0JU0.L | $108.87 | -0.26% | 28.53B | 7.43 | $14.64 | +1.84% |
0KS6.L | $102.46 | -0.81% | 20.53B | 12.57 | $8.15 | +0.82% |
0LD5.L | $77.92 | -0.36% | 16.13B | 25.00 | $3.12 | +1.79% |
0KIZ.L | $117.52 | -0.74% | 15.63B | 9.23 | $12.74 | +4.50% |
0KTS.L | $249.03 | -1.41% | 14.64B | 30.86 | $8.07 | +1.33% |
NXT.L | $12,225.00 | -1.01% | 14.26B | 20.21 | $6.05 | +1.77% |
0LFS.L | $103.28 | -0.47% | 10.27B | 12.92 | $7.99 | +0.91% |