Crown Holdings, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc. 0I4X.L Peers
See (0I4X.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
0I4X.L vs 0JCB.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0JCB.L has a market cap of 22.91B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0JCB.L trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0JCB.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0JCB.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0JCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs SKG.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, SKG.L has a market cap of 21.92B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while SKG.L trades at $4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas SKG.L's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKG.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to SKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs IPC.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, IPC.L has a market cap of 18.00B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while IPC.L trades at $3,410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas IPC.L's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to IPC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0KEZ.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0KEZ.L has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0KEZ.L trades at $180.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0KEZ.L's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0KEZ.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0KEZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs SWR.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, SWR.L has a market cap of 16.04B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while SWR.L trades at $3,073.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas SWR.L's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SWR.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to SWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0HL5.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0HL5.L has a market cap of 14.54B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0HL5.L trades at $51.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0HL5.L's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0HL5.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0HL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0HJR.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0HJR.L has a market cap of 13.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0HJR.L trades at $171.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0HJR.L's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0HJR.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0HJR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0LW9.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0LW9.L has a market cap of 13.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0LW9.L trades at $51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0LW9.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0LW9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0LW9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0HN1.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0HN1.L has a market cap of 8.09B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0HN1.L trades at $68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0HN1.L's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0HN1.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0HN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs SMDS.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, SMDS.L has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while SMDS.L trades at $582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas SMDS.L's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMDS.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to SMDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0CX9.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0CX9.L has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0CX9.L trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0CX9.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0CX9.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L and 0CX9.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0I4X.L vs 0EOF.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0EOF.L has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0EOF.L trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0EOF.L's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0EOF.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L and 0EOF.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0I4X.L vs 0L4F.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0L4F.L has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0L4F.L trades at $27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0L4F.L's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0L4F.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L and 0L4F.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
0I4X.L vs 0K9W.IL Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0K9W.IL has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0K9W.IL trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0K9W.IL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0K9W.IL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0K9W.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0K9W.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0K9W.L has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0K9W.L trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0K9W.L's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0K9W.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0K9W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0O7A.IL Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0O7A.IL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0O7A.IL trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0O7A.IL's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0O7A.IL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0O7A.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0NNC.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0NNC.L has a market cap of 797.34M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0NNC.L trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0NNC.L's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0NNC.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0NNC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0O33.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0O33.L has a market cap of 580.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0O33.L trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0O33.L's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0O33.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0O33.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs 0D1X.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, 0D1X.L has a market cap of 508.22M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while 0D1X.L trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas 0D1X.L's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 0D1X.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to 0D1X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs MACF.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, MACF.L has a market cap of 161.20M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while MACF.L trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas MACF.L's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MACF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to MACF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs RBN.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, RBN.L has a market cap of 22.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while RBN.L trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas RBN.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RBN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to RBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs SYM.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, SYM.L has a market cap of 7.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while SYM.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas SYM.L's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYM.L's ROE of +326.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L is less volatile compared to SYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0I4X.L.
0I4X.L vs CRU.L Comparison
0I4X.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0I4X.L stands at 11.26B. In comparison, CRU.L has a market cap of 6.23M. Regarding current trading prices, 0I4X.L is priced at $96.28, while CRU.L trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0I4X.L currently has a P/E ratio of -22.18, whereas CRU.L's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, 0I4X.L's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRU.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0I4X.L and CRU.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0JCB.L | $55.48 | -0.08% | 22.91B | 12.23 | $4.54 | +4.19% |
SKG.L | $4,180.00 | +4.32% | 21.92B | 16.99 | $2.46 | N/A |
IPC.L | $3,410.00 | +0.59% | 18.00B | 38.75 | $0.88 | N/A |
0KEZ.L | $180.55 | -2.32% | 16.24B | 18.47 | $9.78 | +2.76% |
SWR.L | $3,073.00 | -1.95% | 16.04B | 50.38 | $0.61 | N/A |
0HL5.L | $51.48 | +0.31% | 14.54B | 15.08 | $3.41 | +1.55% |
0HJR.L | $171.24 | +0.66% | 13.39B | 19.64 | $8.72 | +2.06% |
0LW9.L | $51.64 | +4.37% | 13.09B | 17.39 | $2.97 | +0.59% |
0I4X.L | $96.28 | -0.35% | 11.26B | -22.18 | -$4.34 | +1.04% |
0HN1.L | $68.38 | -0.91% | 8.09B | 12.72 | $5.38 | +1.70% |