The Chemours Company
The Chemours Company (0HWG.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0HWG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HWG.L | £11.50 | -12.48% | 1.7B | 2.68 | £4.45 | +7.28% |
| BHP.L | £1,907.50 | +0.03% | 96.8B | 11.35 | £1.68 | +4.85% |
| 0R2J.L | £172.30 | -0.12% | 87.1B | 73.57 | £2.34 | +1.12% |
| 0L5V.L | £335.84 | -0.04% | 83B | 48.32 | £6.89 | +0.87% |
| RIO.L | £4,492.00 | -0.26% | 78.2B | 9.56 | £4.70 | +6.91% |
| 0L8B.L | £93.17 | -2.44% | 75.5B | 21.26 | £4.42 | +2.91% |
| 0IFA.L | £260.62 | -1.56% | 75.4B | 69.25 | £3.84 | +0.97% |
| 0HBH.L | £279.75 | -4.41% | 64B | 28.63 | £10.04 | +2.52% |
| GLEN.L | £300.35 | -1.44% | 35.7B | -30.03 | -£0.10 | +2.90% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.87% |
Stock Comparison
0HWG.L vs BHP.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while BHP.L trades at £1,907.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check BHP.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R2J.L trades at £172.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 73.57. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R2J.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0L5V.L trades at £335.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0L5V.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs RIO.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while RIO.L trades at £4,492.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check RIO.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0L8B.L trades at £93.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0L8B.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0IFA.L trades at £260.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 69.25. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0IFA.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0HBH.L trades at £279.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0HBH.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs GLEN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while GLEN.L trades at £300.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -30.03. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check GLEN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0Z4C.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0K9L.L trades at £138.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0K9L.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0NHS.L trades at £58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0NHS.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0KEI.L trades at £103.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0KEI.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs AAL.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while AAL.L trades at £2,068.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check AAL.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0EDD.L trades at £54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0EDD.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0HQU.L trades at £90.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0HQU.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0UGS.L trades at £34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -82.23. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0UGS.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R07.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R07.L trades at £37.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R07.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0K3B.L trades at £35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0K3B.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0LJ9.L trades at £54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0LJ9.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0KXS.L trades at £153.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0KXS.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0LVK.L trades at £76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0LVK.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0IF3.L trades at £57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0IF3.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0HC7.L trades at £66.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0HC7.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0HCB.L trades at £28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0HCB.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QYN.L trades at £4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QYN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs S32.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while S32.L trades at £140.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check S32.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0U6C.L trades at £27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0U6C.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0HUR.L trades at £48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0HUR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R0U.L trades at £8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -81.32. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R0U.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -23.13. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0AHJ.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0I0H.L trades at £10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0I0H.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VBE.L trades at £27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -178.66. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VBE.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0IK3.L trades at £37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0IK3.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VGM.L trades at £12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 61.85. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VGM.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R0A.L trades at £5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 192.00. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R0A.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0L45.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0L45.L trades at £60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0L45.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VL5.L trades at £40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VL5.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VGE.L trades at £16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VGE.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0HWG.L has daily volatility of 6.37 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0TWH.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QYM.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VOA.L trades at £16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VOA.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VHI.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0KW8.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R2C.L trades at £7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 68.77. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R2C.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0NZN.L trades at £828.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0NZN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QZ2.L trades at £5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QZ2.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R11.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R11.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ADT1.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ADT1.L trades at £292.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ADT1.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0G5B.L trades at £124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0G5B.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 615.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VIK.L trades at £3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VIK.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0JZT.L trades at £11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -82.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0JZT.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 543M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0O6D.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 434.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0KD1.L trades at £3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -36.14. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0KD1.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R20.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R20.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R20.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs GFM.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while GFM.L trades at £188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check GFM.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs SOLG.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while SOLG.L trades at £11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check SOLG.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs KMR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 288.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while KMR.L trades at £326.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check KMR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs SVML.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while SVML.L trades at £34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check SVML.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0UYN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs PRE.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while PRE.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -34.80. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check PRE.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0RRC.L trades at £5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0RRC.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs CAPD.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while CAPD.L trades at £92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check CAPD.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0P07.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 180.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0P07.L trades at £0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0P07.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ECOR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ECOR.L trades at £66.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ECOR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0V46.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0V46.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0V46.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs BSE.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check BSE.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs TRR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check TRR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs MKA.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 121.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while MKA.L trades at £36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -36.50. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check MKA.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0VNO.L trades at £0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0VNO.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs KP2.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while KP2.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check KP2.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs JLP.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while JLP.L trades at £3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check JLP.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs CUSN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while CUSN.L trades at £7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check CUSN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs RBW.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while RBW.L trades at £13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check RBW.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs SAV.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while SAV.L trades at £3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check SAV.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0UIK.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0IYS.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QVG.L trades at £6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QVG.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QQR.L trades at £14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QQR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs KOD.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while KOD.L trades at £0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check KOD.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0R0D.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ATM.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ATM.L trades at £3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ATM.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ALL.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ALL.L trades at £7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ALL.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs AFRK.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check AFRK.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0ICI.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs HE1.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while HE1.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check HE1.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0UYO.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0QPH.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs KAV.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while KAV.L trades at £1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check KAV.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs FAR.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while FAR.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check FAR.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ARS.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ARS.L trades at £1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ARS.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 0UVX.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 0UVX.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while ZNWD.L trades at £5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check ZNWD.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs NMT.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check NMT.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs 1SN.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while 1SN.L trades at £5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check 1SN.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs CRCL.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while CRCL.L trades at £0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check CRCL.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs PREM.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PREM.L has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while PREM.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas PREM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PREM.L's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to PREM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check PREM.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs GSP.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check GSP.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs MET1.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while MET1.L trades at £4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check MET1.L's competition here
0HWG.L vs EMH.L Comparison August 2025
0HWG.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HWG.L stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HWG.L is priced at £11.50, while EMH.L trades at £8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HWG.L currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, 0HWG.L's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HWG.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HWG.L.Check EMH.L's competition here