Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Kongsberg Automotive ASA (0HW0.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0HW0.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HW0.L | £1.50 | -3.72% | 1.4B | 23.05 | £0.07 | N/A |
| 0YCP.L | £58.30 | +0.38% | 13.7B | 49.41 | £1.18 | N/A |
| 0MI0.L | £822.00 | +0.88% | 9B | N/A | N/A | +2.52% |
| 0HJH.L | £110.46 | -1.73% | 8.6B | 27.24 | £4.11 | +2.52% |
| 0HOU.L | £36.43 | +4.38% | 7.6B | 13.08 | £2.81 | +1.18% |
| 0JTQ.L | £92.76 | -1.91% | 4.9B | 25.45 | £3.65 | +3.32% |
| 0QLL.L | £8.81 | -4.34% | 2.5B | 2.88 | £3.06 | N/A |
| 0P49.L | £58.20 | -0.85% | 1.2B | 35.55 | £1.67 | +4.74% |
| TIFS.L | £199.60 | +0.00% | 983M | 39.92 | £0.05 | +0.87% |
| 0QOB.L | £146.00 | +0.27% | 845.7M | 29.80 | £4.90 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
0HW0.L vs 0YCP.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0YCP.L has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0YCP.L trades at £58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0YCP.L's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0YCP.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0YCP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0YCP.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0MI0.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0MI0.L has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0MI0.L trades at £822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0MI0.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0MI0.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0MI0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0MI0.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0HJH.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0HJH.L has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0HJH.L trades at £110.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0HJH.L's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0HJH.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0HJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0HJH.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0HOU.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0HOU.L has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0HOU.L trades at £36.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0HOU.L's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0HOU.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0HOU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0HOU.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0JTQ.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0JTQ.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0JTQ.L trades at £92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0JTQ.L's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0JTQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0JTQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0JTQ.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0QLL.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0QLL.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0QLL.L trades at £8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0QLL.L's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QLL.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0QLL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0QLL.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0P49.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0P49.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0P49.L trades at £58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0P49.L's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0P49.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0P49.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0P49.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs TIFS.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TIFS.L has a market cap of 983M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while TIFS.L trades at £199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas TIFS.L's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TIFS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to TIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check TIFS.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0QOB.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0QOB.L has a market cap of 845.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0QOB.L trades at £146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0QOB.L's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QOB.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0QOB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0QOB.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs ABDP.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABDP.L has a market cap of 322.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while ABDP.L trades at £1,405.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas ABDP.L's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABDP.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to ABDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check ABDP.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0F8V.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0F8V.L has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0F8V.L trades at £8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0F8V.L's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0F8V.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0F8V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0F8V.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0G68.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0G68.L has a market cap of 171.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0G68.L trades at £10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0G68.L's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0G68.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0G68.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0G68.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0QZ7.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0QZ7.L has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0QZ7.L trades at £2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0QZ7.L's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0QZ7.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0QZ7.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0RV4.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0RV4.L has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0RV4.L trades at £3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0RV4.L's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0RV4.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0RV4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0RV4.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0GOX.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0GOX.L has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0GOX.L trades at £3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0GOX.L's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0GOX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0GOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0GOX.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0ND3.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0ND3.L has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0ND3.L trades at £1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0ND3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0ND3.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0ND3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0ND3.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs CAR.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CAR.L has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while CAR.L trades at £47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas CAR.L's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CAR.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to CAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check CAR.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0RPV.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0RPV.L has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0RPV.L trades at £9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0RPV.L's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0RPV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to 0RPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0RPV.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs CTA.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTA.L has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while CTA.L trades at £33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas CTA.L's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CTA.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to CTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check CTA.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs TRT.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRT.L has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while TRT.L trades at £136.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas TRT.L's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TRT.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to TRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check TRT.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs SCE.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCE.L has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while SCE.L trades at £1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SCE.L's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is less volatile compared to SCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check SCE.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0NFG.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0NFG.L has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0NFG.L trades at £2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0NFG.L's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0NFG.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to 0NFG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check 0NFG.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs AUTG.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AUTG.L has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while AUTG.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas AUTG.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AUTG.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to AUTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check AUTG.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs STG.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STG.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while STG.L trades at £27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas STG.L's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STG.L's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to STG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check STG.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs SED.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SED.L has a market cap of 944.2K. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while SED.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SED.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SED.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HW0.L is more volatile compared to SED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HW0.L.Check SED.L's competition here
0HW0.L vs 0RT7.L Comparison August 2025
0HW0.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HW0.L stands at 1.4B. In comparison, 0RT7.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HW0.L is priced at £1.50, while 0RT7.L trades at £19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HW0.L currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas 0RT7.L's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, 0HW0.L's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 0RT7.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0HW0.L has daily volatility of 1.98 and 0RT7.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check 0RT7.L's competition here