Azenta, Inc.
Azenta, Inc. 0HQ1.L Peers
See (0HQ1.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HQ1.L | £31.83 | -2.71% | 1.5B | 1.07 | £29.66 | N/A |
| 0A0D.L | £71.58 | -0.26% | 34.6B | 78.75 | £0.91 | +0.73% |
| 0O5H.IL | £47.84 | +0.00% | 17.7B | 16.49 | £2.93 | +4.98% |
| 0I3I.L | £72.58 | -0.01% | 14.5B | 3.82 | £19.03 | N/A |
| CTEC.L | £241.40 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 34.51 | £0.07 | +2.74% |
| 0I8F.L | £15.78 | +0.03% | 3.1B | 9.33 | £1.68 | +5.10% |
| 0QMV.L | £124.70 | -0.80% | 2B | 50.24 | £2.48 | +1.72% |
| AMS.L | £199.00 | +0.00% | 447.1M | 69.00 | £0.03 | +1.26% |
| 0NJ5.L | £1.29 | +0.00% | 350.8M | 18.37 | £0.07 | N/A |
| 0QQM.L | £139.50 | +0.00% | 333.4M | 53.54 | £2.62 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
0HQ1.L vs 0A0D.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0A0D.L has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0A0D.L trades at £71.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0A0D.L's P/E ratio is 78.75. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0A0D.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0A0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0O5H.IL Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0O5H.IL has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0O5H.IL trades at £47.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0O5H.IL's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0O5H.IL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0O5H.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0I3I.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0I3I.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0I3I.L trades at £72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0I3I.L's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0I3I.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0I3I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs CTEC.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTEC.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while CTEC.L trades at £241.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas CTEC.L's P/E ratio is 34.51. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTEC.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to CTEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0I8F.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0I8F.L has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0I8F.L trades at £15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0I8F.L's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0I8F.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0I8F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0QMV.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0QMV.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0QMV.L trades at £124.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0QMV.L's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0QMV.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0QMV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs AMS.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMS.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while AMS.L trades at £199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas AMS.L's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to AMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0NJ5.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0NJ5.L has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0NJ5.L trades at £1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0NJ5.L's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0NJ5.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to 0NJ5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs 0QQM.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, 0QQM.L has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while 0QQM.L trades at £139.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas 0QQM.L's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to 0QQM.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is more volatile compared to 0QQM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs TSTL.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSTL.L has a market cap of 193.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while TSTL.L trades at £408.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas TSTL.L's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TSTL.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to TSTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs BVC.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BVC.L has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while BVC.L trades at £15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas BVC.L's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVC.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to BVC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs SPEC.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPEC.L has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while SPEC.L trades at £47.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas SPEC.L's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPEC.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to SPEC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs CNSL.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNSL.L has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while CNSL.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas CNSL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNSL.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to CNSL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.
0HQ1.L vs ODX.L Comparison
0HQ1.L plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HQ1.L stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ODX.L has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HQ1.L is priced at £31.83, while ODX.L trades at £2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HQ1.L currently has a P/E ratio of 1.07, whereas ODX.L's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, 0HQ1.L's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ODX.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HQ1.L is less volatile compared to ODX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HQ1.L.