Autoliv, Inc.
Autoliv, Inc. 0HJH.L Peers
See (0HJH.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HJH.L | $101.07 | +3.34% | 7.58B | 24.58 | $4.11 | +2.73% |
| 0YCP.L | $58.30 | +0.38% | 13.70B | 49.41 | $1.18 | N/A |
| 0HOU.L | $33.28 | +2.18% | 7.31B | 11.85 | $2.81 | +1.32% |
| 0MI0.L | $822.00 | +0.88% | 7.31B | N/A | N/A | +2.71% |
| 0JTQ.L | $89.83 | +1.64% | 4.80B | 24.65 | $3.65 | +3.43% |
| 0QLL.L | $8.81 | -4.34% | 2.51B | 2.88 | $3.06 | N/A |
| 0HW0.L | $1.55 | +0.72% | 1.39B | 23.77 | $0.07 | N/A |
| 0P49.L | $61.40 | +0.66% | 1.29B | 36.81 | $1.67 | +4.45% |
| TIFS.L | $199.60 | +0.20% | 983.02M | 39.92 | $0.05 | +2.24% |
| 0QOB.L | $140.60 | +2.78% | 786.66M | 28.69 | $4.90 | +1.96% |
Stock Comparison
0HJH.L vs 0YCP.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0YCP.L has a market cap of 13.70B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0YCP.L trades at $58.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0YCP.L's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0YCP.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0YCP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0HOU.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0HOU.L has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0HOU.L trades at $33.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0HOU.L's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0HOU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0HOU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0MI0.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0MI0.L has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0MI0.L trades at $822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0MI0.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0MI0.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0MI0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0JTQ.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0JTQ.L has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0JTQ.L trades at $89.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0JTQ.L's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0JTQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0JTQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0QLL.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0QLL.L has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0QLL.L trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0QLL.L's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0QLL.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0QLL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0HW0.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0HW0.L has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0HW0.L trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0HW0.L's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0HW0.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0HW0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0P49.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0P49.L has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0P49.L trades at $61.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0P49.L's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0P49.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0P49.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs TIFS.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, TIFS.L has a market cap of 983.02M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while TIFS.L trades at $199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas TIFS.L's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TIFS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to TIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0QOB.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0QOB.L has a market cap of 786.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0QOB.L trades at $140.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0QOB.L's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0QOB.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0QOB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs ABDP.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, ABDP.L has a market cap of 426.95M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while ABDP.L trades at $1,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas ABDP.L's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ABDP.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to ABDP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0F8V.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0F8V.L has a market cap of 202.92M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0F8V.L trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0F8V.L's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0F8V.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0F8V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0G68.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0G68.L has a market cap of 178.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0G68.L trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0G68.L's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0G68.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0G68.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0QZ7.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0QZ7.L has a market cap of 138.83M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0QZ7.L trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0QZ7.L's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0QZ7.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0GOX.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0GOX.L has a market cap of 65.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0GOX.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0GOX.L's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0GOX.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0GOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0RV4.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0RV4.L has a market cap of 60.66M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0RV4.L trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0RV4.L's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0RV4.L's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0RV4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0RPV.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0RPV.L has a market cap of 32.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0RPV.L trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0RPV.L's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0RPV.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0RPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs CAR.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, CAR.L has a market cap of 28.04M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while CAR.L trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas CAR.L's P/E ratio is -19.10. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CAR.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to CAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs CTA.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, CTA.L has a market cap of 26.13M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while CTA.L trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas CTA.L's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CTA.L's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to CTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs TRT.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, TRT.L has a market cap of 19.18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while TRT.L trades at $126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas TRT.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRT.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to TRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0ND3.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0ND3.L has a market cap of 11.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0ND3.L trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0ND3.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0ND3.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to 0ND3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs 0NFG.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, 0NFG.L has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while 0NFG.L trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas 0NFG.L's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 0NFG.L's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to 0NFG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs SCE.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, SCE.L has a market cap of 9.05M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while SCE.L trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SCE.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SCE.L's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to SCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs AUTG.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, AUTG.L has a market cap of 3.82M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while AUTG.L trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas AUTG.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AUTG.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to AUTG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs STG.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, STG.L has a market cap of 3.37M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while STG.L trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas STG.L's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STG.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is less volatile compared to STG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.
0HJH.L vs SED.L Comparison
0HJH.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HJH.L stands at 7.58B. In comparison, SED.L has a market cap of 944190.00. Regarding current trading prices, 0HJH.L is priced at $101.07, while SED.L trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HJH.L currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SED.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, 0HJH.L's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SED.L's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HJH.L is more volatile compared to SED.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HJH.L.