Amphenol Corporation
Amphenol Corporation 0HFB.L Peers
See (0HFB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HFB.L | £98.37 | +0.00% | 118B | 36.21 | £2.69 | +0.68% |
| MAW.L | £41,680.00 | +12.28% | 518.3B | 26.94 | £1,559.04 | +0.23% |
| 0Z4I.L | £69.65 | +1.46% | 75.6B | 13.04 | £5.34 | +0.77% |
| HHPD.L | £6.98 | +0.00% | 48.5B | 8.41 | £0.83 | +4.70% |
| 0R2X.L | £52.63 | +1.33% | 44.9B | 41.67 | £1.26 | +2.13% |
| 0J51.L | £20.66 | -0.01% | 26.9B | 7.37 | £2.79 | +2.54% |
| 0J2E.L | £24.74 | +0.00% | 23.9B | 4.54 | £5.60 | +4.50% |
| 0QZF.L | £63.82 | +0.54% | 22.3B | 11.05 | £5.78 | +0.16% |
| 0K6F.L | £106.08 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 26.23 | £4.09 | +1.94% |
| 0KSA.L | £57.74 | +0.01% | 18.1B | -227.24 | -£0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0HFB.L vs MAW.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, MAW.L has a market cap of 518.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while MAW.L trades at £41,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas MAW.L's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to MAW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0Z4I.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0Z4I.L has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0Z4I.L trades at £69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0Z4I.L's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0Z4I.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs HHPD.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, HHPD.L has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while HHPD.L trades at £6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas HHPD.L's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HHPD.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to HHPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0R2X.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0R2X.L has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0R2X.L trades at £52.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0R2X.L's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0R2X.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0R2X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0J51.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0J51.L has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0J51.L trades at £20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0J51.L's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0J51.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0J51.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0J2E.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0J2E.L has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0J2E.L trades at £24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0J2E.L's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0J2E.L's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0J2E.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QZF.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QZF.L has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QZF.L trades at £63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QZF.L's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QZF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QZF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0K6F.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0K6F.L has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0K6F.L trades at £106.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0K6F.L's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K6F.L's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0K6F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0KSA.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0KSA.L has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0KSA.L trades at £57.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0KSA.L's P/E ratio is -227.24. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0KSA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0KSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0F0J.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0F0J.L has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0F0J.L trades at £62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0F0J.L's P/E ratio is 77.39. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0F0J.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0F0J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0LHO.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0LHO.L has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0LHO.L trades at £79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0LHO.L's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0LHO.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0LHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0LJE.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0LJE.L has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0LJE.L trades at £155.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0LJE.L's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0LJE.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0LJE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0HI1.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0HI1.L has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0HI1.L trades at £128.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0HI1.L's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0HI1.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0HI1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0I14.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0I14.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0I14.L trades at £31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0I14.L's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0I14.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0I14.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0VAG.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0VAG.L has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0VAG.L trades at £129.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0VAG.L's P/E ratio is 79.39. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0VAG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0VAG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs SXS.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, SXS.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while SXS.L trades at £3,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas SXS.L's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SXS.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to SXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QLW.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QLW.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QLW.L trades at £268.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QLW.L's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QLW.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QLW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0J86.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0J86.L has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0J86.L trades at £68.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0J86.L's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0J86.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0J86.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QK5.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QK5.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QK5.L trades at £106.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QK5.L's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QK5.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0QK5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0YQA.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0YQA.L has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0YQA.L trades at £22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0YQA.L's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0YQA.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0YQA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs RSW.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, RSW.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while RSW.L trades at £2,860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas RSW.L's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RSW.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to RSW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0ROQ.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0ROQ.L has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0ROQ.L trades at £249.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0ROQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0ROQ.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0ROQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0GEG.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0GEG.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0GEG.L trades at £49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0GEG.L's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0GEG.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0GEG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0RTL.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0RTL.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0RTL.L trades at £55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0RTL.L's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0RTL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0RTL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0M58.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0M58.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0M58.L trades at £26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0M58.L's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0M58.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0M58.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QHK.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QHK.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QHK.L trades at £85.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QHK.L's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QHK.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QHK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0ZPV.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0ZPV.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0ZPV.L trades at £22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0ZPV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0ZPV.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0ZPV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0SE5.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0SE5.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0SE5.L trades at £83.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0SE5.L's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0SE5.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0SE5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0JI9.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0JI9.L has a market cap of 992.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0JI9.L trades at £1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0JI9.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0JI9.L's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0JI9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QKB.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QKB.L has a market cap of 948.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QKB.L trades at £833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QKB.L's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QKB.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QKB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs RPI.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, RPI.L has a market cap of 887.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while RPI.L trades at £456.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas RPI.L's P/E ratio is 91.80. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RPI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to RPI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0H38.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0H38.L has a market cap of 832.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0H38.L trades at £5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0H38.L's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0H38.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0H38.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QPR.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QPR.L has a market cap of 731.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QPR.L trades at £161.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QPR.L's P/E ratio is 62.96. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QPR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QPR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs DSCV.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, DSCV.L has a market cap of 625.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while DSCV.L trades at £652.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas DSCV.L's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DSCV.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to DSCV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QDT.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QDT.L has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QDT.L trades at £6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QDT.L's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QDT.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0QDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs JDG.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, JDG.L has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while JDG.L trades at £8,880.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas JDG.L's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JDG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to JDG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0H0U.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0H0U.L has a market cap of 511.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0H0U.L trades at £42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0H0U.L's P/E ratio is 837.25. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0H0U.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0H0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0NNU.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0NNU.L has a market cap of 475M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0NNU.L trades at £72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0NNU.L's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0NNU.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0NNU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0IF4.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0IF4.L has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0IF4.L trades at £5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0IF4.L's P/E ratio is 182.85. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0IF4.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0IF4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0FRI.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0FRI.L has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0FRI.L trades at £18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0FRI.L's P/E ratio is 97.41. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0FRI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0FRI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0DUI.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0DUI.L has a market cap of 379.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0DUI.L trades at £12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0DUI.L's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0DUI.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0DUI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0OC9.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0OC9.L has a market cap of 349.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0OC9.L trades at £53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0OC9.L's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0OC9.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0OC9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0K17.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0K17.L has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0K17.L trades at £1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0K17.L's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K17.L's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0K17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0NFS.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0NFS.L has a market cap of 197.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0NFS.L trades at £3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0NFS.L's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0NFS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0NFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0K6M.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0K6M.L has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0K6M.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0K6M.L's P/E ratio is 99.29. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0K6M.L's ROE of +6.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0K6M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs TTG.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, TTG.L has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while TTG.L trades at £112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas TTG.L's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TTG.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to TTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs SRT.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, SRT.L has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while SRT.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas SRT.L's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SRT.L's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to SRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs GHH.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, GHH.L has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while GHH.L trades at £641.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas GHH.L's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GHH.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to GHH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0Y2A.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0Y2A.L has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0Y2A.L trades at £57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0Y2A.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0Y2A.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0Y2A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0MTP.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0MTP.L has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0MTP.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0MTP.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0MTP.L's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0MTP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs QTX.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, QTX.L has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while QTX.L trades at £244.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas QTX.L's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to QTX.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to QTX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs SOLI.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, SOLI.L has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while SOLI.L trades at £205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas SOLI.L's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SOLI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to SOLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs XAR.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, XAR.L has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while XAR.L trades at £123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas XAR.L's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to XAR.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to XAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs KETL.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, KETL.L has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while KETL.L trades at £42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas KETL.L's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KETL.L's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to KETL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs SDI.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, SDI.L has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while SDI.L trades at £87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas SDI.L's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SDI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to SDI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0QNQ.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0QNQ.L has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0QNQ.L trades at £1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0QNQ.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0QNQ.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0QNQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0OJJ.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0OJJ.L has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0OJJ.L trades at £3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0OJJ.L's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0OJJ.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0OJJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs WPHO.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, WPHO.L has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while WPHO.L trades at £54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas WPHO.L's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WPHO.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to WPHO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs KMK.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, KMK.L has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while KMK.L trades at £5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas KMK.L's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KMK.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to KMK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0I0B.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0I0B.L has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0I0B.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0I0B.L's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0I0B.L's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0I0B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs CPX.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, CPX.L has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while CPX.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas CPX.L's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CPX.L's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to CPX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs LST.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, LST.L has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while LST.L trades at £3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas LST.L's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LST.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to LST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0IH3.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0IH3.L has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0IH3.L trades at £0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0IH3.L's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0IH3.L's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to 0IH3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs STAR.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, STAR.L has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while STAR.L trades at £7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas STAR.L's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STAR.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to STAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs TRAK.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, TRAK.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while TRAK.L trades at £9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas TRAK.L's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRAK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to TRAK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs ZYT.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, ZYT.L has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while ZYT.L trades at £44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas ZYT.L's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZYT.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to ZYT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs HDT.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, HDT.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while HDT.L trades at £75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas HDT.L's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HDT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to HDT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs NNN.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, NNN.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while NNN.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas NNN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NNN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0HFB.L has daily volatility of 1.37 and NNN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0HFB.L vs MSYS.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, MSYS.L has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while MSYS.L trades at £0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas MSYS.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MSYS.L's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to MSYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs TRAC.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, TRAC.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while TRAC.L trades at £2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas TRAC.L's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRAC.L's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to TRAC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs TWD.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, TWD.L has a market cap of 899.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while TWD.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas TWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TWD.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to TWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs PIP.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, PIP.L has a market cap of 499.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while PIP.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas PIP.L's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PIP.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to PIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs ECM.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, ECM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while ECM.L trades at £1,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas ECM.L's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ECM.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is less volatile compared to ECM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0I17.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0I17.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0I17.L trades at £168.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0I17.L's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0I17.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0I17.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs PPIX.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, PPIX.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while PPIX.L trades at £8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas PPIX.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PPIX.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to PPIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs 0NEB.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, 0NEB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while 0NEB.L trades at £13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas 0NEB.L's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0NEB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0HFB.L is more volatile compared to 0NEB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HFB.L.
0HFB.L vs OTAQ.L Comparison
0HFB.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HFB.L stands at 118B. In comparison, OTAQ.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0HFB.L is priced at £98.37, while OTAQ.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HFB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 36.21, whereas OTAQ.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, 0HFB.L's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OTAQ.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0HFB.L has daily volatility of 1.37 and OTAQ.L has daily volatility of N/A.