AMETEK, Inc.
AMETEK, Inc. 0HF7.L Peers
See (0HF7.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0HF7.L | $179.66 | -0.84% | 41.48B | 40.10 | $4.48 | +0.64% |
| 0NX2.L | $27.51 | -0.48% | 58.65B | 12.23 | $2.25 | +1.60% |
| 0L2T.L | $27.00 | -2.17% | 8.12B | N/A | N/A | +0.44% |
| 0RQH.L | $42.90 | -0.12% | 7.56B | 15.38 | $2.79 | +3.20% |
| 0G9R.L | $165.20 | N/A | 1.45B | -103.64 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| SMS.L | $954.00 | +0.21% | 1.32B | 86.73 | $0.11 | +0.87% |
| 0REY.L | $159.98 | N/A | 963.00M | 43.93 | $3.64 | N/A |
| 0R1J.L | $18.11 | N/A | 799.61M | -18.71 | -$0.97 | N/A |
| VLX.L | $269.00 | +0.56% | 494.47M | 14.94 | $0.18 | +1.25% |
| TFW.L | $293.00 | +1.03% | 341.45M | 13.95 | $0.21 | +1.45% |
Stock Comparison
0HF7.L vs 0NX2.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0NX2.L has a market cap of 58.65B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0NX2.L trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0NX2.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0NX2.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0NX2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0L2T.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0L2T.L has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0L2T.L trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0L2T.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0L2T.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to 0L2T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0RQH.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0RQH.L has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0RQH.L trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0RQH.L's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0RQH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0RQH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0G9R.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0G9R.L has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0G9R.L trades at $165.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0G9R.L's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0G9R.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0G9R.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs SMS.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, SMS.L has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while SMS.L trades at $954.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas SMS.L's P/E ratio is 86.73. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMS.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to SMS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0REY.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0REY.L has a market cap of 963.00M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0REY.L trades at $159.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0REY.L's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0REY.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0REY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0R1J.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0R1J.L has a market cap of 799.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0R1J.L trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0R1J.L's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0R1J.L's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0R1J.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs VLX.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, VLX.L has a market cap of 494.47M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while VLX.L trades at $269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas VLX.L's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VLX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to VLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs TFW.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, TFW.L has a market cap of 341.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while TFW.L trades at $293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas TFW.L's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFW.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to TFW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0QJY.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0QJY.L has a market cap of 314.01M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0QJY.L trades at $498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0QJY.L's P/E ratio is -185.34. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0QJY.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to 0QJY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0QPV.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0QPV.L has a market cap of 294.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0QPV.L trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0QPV.L's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0QPV.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to 0QPV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0QP6.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0QP6.L has a market cap of 225.27M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0QP6.L trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0QP6.L's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0QP6.L's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0QP6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs LUCE.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, LUCE.L has a market cap of 223.46M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while LUCE.L trades at $147.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas LUCE.L's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUCE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to LUCE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs XPP.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, XPP.L has a market cap of 209.06M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while XPP.L trades at $749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas XPP.L's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XPP.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to XPP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0MJH.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0MJH.L has a market cap of 204.38M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0MJH.L trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0MJH.L's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0MJH.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to 0MJH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs SUP.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, SUP.L has a market cap of 187.70M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while SUP.L trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas SUP.L's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUP.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to SUP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0A60.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0A60.L has a market cap of 164.62M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0A60.L trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0A60.L's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0A60.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0A60.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs CWR.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, CWR.L has a market cap of 148.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while CWR.L trades at $76.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas CWR.L's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CWR.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to CWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0QL5.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0QL5.L has a market cap of 141.99M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0QL5.L trades at $209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0QL5.L's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0QL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to 0QL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs AFC.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, AFC.L has a market cap of 90.51M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while AFC.L trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas AFC.L's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFC.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to AFC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0O27.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0O27.L has a market cap of 70.32M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0O27.L trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0O27.L's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0O27.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0O27.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs DWHT.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, DWHT.L has a market cap of 63.29M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while DWHT.L trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas DWHT.L's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DWHT.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to DWHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs IKA.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, IKA.L has a market cap of 61.36M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while IKA.L trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas IKA.L's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IKA.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to IKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs DWHA.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, DWHA.L has a market cap of 58.54M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while DWHA.L trades at $575.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas DWHA.L's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DWHA.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to DWHA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs 0GYQ.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, 0GYQ.L has a market cap of 51.64M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while 0GYQ.L trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas 0GYQ.L's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to 0GYQ.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to 0GYQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs DIA.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, DIA.L has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while DIA.L trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas DIA.L's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIA.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to DIA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs GELN.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, GELN.L has a market cap of 19.45M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while GELN.L trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas GELN.L's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GELN.L's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to GELN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs EAAS.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, EAAS.L has a market cap of 19.17M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while EAAS.L trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas EAAS.L's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EAAS.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to EAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs LPA.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, LPA.L has a market cap of 6.61M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while LPA.L trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas LPA.L's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPA.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to LPA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs PPS.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, PPS.L has a market cap of 2.91M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while PPS.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas PPS.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PPS.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to PPS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs DGI.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, DGI.L has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while DGI.L trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas DGI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGI.L's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is less volatile compared to DGI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.
0HF7.L vs AMTE.L Comparison
0HF7.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0HF7.L stands at 41.48B. In comparison, AMTE.L has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, 0HF7.L is priced at $179.66, while AMTE.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0HF7.L currently has a P/E ratio of 40.10, whereas AMTE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, 0HF7.L's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMTE.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0HF7.L is more volatile compared to AMTE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0HF7.L.