ESI Group S.A.
ESI Group S.A. (0GM9.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0GM9.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0GM9.L | £153.98 | -0.32% | 880M | -47.53 | -£3.24 | N/A |
0A7O.L | £400.96 | -0.48% | 111.5B | -7.52 | -£53.33 | +0.08% |
0A3O.L | £140.45 | -6.68% | 48.4B | 46816.67 | £0.00 | N/A |
0IL6.L | £321.00 | +7.47% | 17.1B | 56.56 | £5.68 | N/A |
SGE.L | £1,220.00 | +1.62% | 11.7B | 35.88 | £0.34 | +1.75% |
0U3Q.L | £227.52 | +24.87% | 5.9B | 104.90 | £2.17 | +0.92% |
0QOA.L | £74.54 | -5.84% | 4.8B | 30.90 | £2.41 | +1.77% |
0DWV.L | £216.00 | -1.14% | 4.2B | 137.49 | £1.57 | +0.30% |
0OA4.L | £225.40 | -3.10% | 3.8B | 1259.22 | £0.18 | +0.26% |
0M2A.L | £13.20 | -0.23% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.54% |
Stock Comparison
0GM9.L vs 0A7O.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0A7O.L has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0A7O.L trades at £400.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0A7O.L's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0A7O.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0A7O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0A7O.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0A3O.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0A3O.L has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0A3O.L trades at £140.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0A3O.L's P/E ratio is 46816.67. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0A3O.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0A3O.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0A3O.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0IL6.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0IL6.L has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0IL6.L trades at £321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0IL6.L's P/E ratio is 56.56. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IL6.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0IL6.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0IL6.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SGE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SGE.L has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SGE.L trades at £1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SGE.L's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGE.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SGE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SGE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0U3Q.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0U3Q.L has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0U3Q.L trades at £227.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0U3Q.L's P/E ratio is 104.90. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0U3Q.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0U3Q.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0U3Q.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0QOA.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0QOA.L has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0QOA.L trades at £74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0QOA.L's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QOA.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0QOA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0QOA.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0DWV.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0DWV.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0DWV.L trades at £216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0DWV.L's P/E ratio is 137.49. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0DWV.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0DWV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0DWV.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0OA4.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0OA4.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0OA4.L trades at £225.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0OA4.L's P/E ratio is 1259.22. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0OA4.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0OA4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0OA4.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0M2A.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0M2A.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0M2A.L trades at £13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0M2A.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0M2A.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0M2A.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0M2A.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TRST.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TRST.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TRST.L trades at £250.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TRST.L's P/E ratio is 250.60. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRST.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TRST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TRST.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs KNOS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, KNOS.L has a market cap of 895.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while KNOS.L trades at £740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas KNOS.L's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNOS.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to KNOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check KNOS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0RS2.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0RS2.L has a market cap of 860.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0RS2.L trades at £51.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0RS2.L's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0RS2.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0RS2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0RS2.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs LTG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, LTG.L has a market cap of 791.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while LTG.L trades at £99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas LTG.L's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LTG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to LTG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check LTG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ALFA.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ALFA.L has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ALFA.L trades at £229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ALFA.L's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALFA.L's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ALFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ALFA.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ATG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ATG.L has a market cap of 592.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ATG.L trades at £492.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ATG.L's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATG.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ATG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ATG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs GBG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, GBG.L has a market cap of 580.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while GBG.L trades at £234.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas GBG.L's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to GBG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check GBG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs DEV.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, DEV.L has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while DEV.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas DEV.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEV.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and DEV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DEV.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs NCC.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, NCC.L has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while NCC.L trades at £150.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas NCC.L's P/E ratio is -18.80. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCC.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to NCC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check NCC.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CER.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CER.L has a market cap of 448.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CER.L trades at £1,520.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CER.L's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CER.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CER.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CER.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs PBEE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, PBEE.L has a market cap of 396M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while PBEE.L trades at £167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas PBEE.L's P/E ratio is -167.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PBEE.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to PBEE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check PBEE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0L8Z.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0L8Z.L has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0L8Z.L trades at £4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0L8Z.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0L8Z.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0L8Z.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0L8Z.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs IQG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, IQG.L has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while IQG.L trades at £478.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas IQG.L's P/E ratio is -239.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IQG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to IQG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check IQG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs IDOX.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, IDOX.L has a market cap of 282.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while IDOX.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas IDOX.L's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDOX.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to IDOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check IDOX.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs BIG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, BIG.L has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while BIG.L trades at £91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas BIG.L's P/E ratio is 91.60. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIG.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to BIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check BIG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs DOTD.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, DOTD.L has a market cap of 221.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while DOTD.L trades at £72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas DOTD.L's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOTD.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to DOTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check DOTD.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs NET.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, NET.L has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while NET.L trades at £121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas NET.L's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NET.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to NET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check NET.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ACSO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ACSO.L has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ACSO.L trades at £448.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ACSO.L's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACSO.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ACSO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ACSO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs APTD.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, APTD.L has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while APTD.L trades at £301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas APTD.L's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APTD.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to APTD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check APTD.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SAAS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SAAS.L has a market cap of 159.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SAAS.L trades at £137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SAAS.L's P/E ratio is -68.75. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAAS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SAAS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SAAS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ELCO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ELCO.L has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ELCO.L trades at £175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ELCO.L's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELCO.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ELCO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ELCO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0N6K.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0N6K.L has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0N6K.L trades at £3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0N6K.L's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0N6K.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0N6K.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0N6K.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0AAW.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0AAW.L has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0AAW.L trades at £13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0AAW.L's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0AAW.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0AAW.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0AAW.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs GHT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, GHT.L has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while GHT.L trades at £161.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas GHT.L's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GHT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and GHT.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GHT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs AOM.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, AOM.L has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while AOM.L trades at £181.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas AOM.L's P/E ratio is 181.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AOM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to AOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check AOM.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TRCS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TRCS.L has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TRCS.L trades at £380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TRCS.L's P/E ratio is 190.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRCS.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TRCS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TRCS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SPE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SPE.L has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SPE.L trades at £990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SPE.L's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPE.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and SPE.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SPSC.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SPSC.L has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SPSC.L trades at £205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SPSC.L's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPSC.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and SPSC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPSC.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SPSY.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SPSY.L has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SPSY.L trades at £216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SPSY.L's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPSY.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SPSY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SPSY.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TRB.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TRB.L has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TRB.L trades at £48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TRB.L's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRB.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TRB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TRB.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs IGP.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, IGP.L has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while IGP.L trades at £158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas IGP.L's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IGP.L's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to IGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check IGP.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs RM.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, RM.L has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while RM.L trades at £103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas RM.L's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RM.L's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to RM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check RM.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0QK1.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0QK1.L has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0QK1.L trades at £59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0QK1.L's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QK1.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0QK1.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QK1.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ACC.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ACC.L has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ACC.L trades at £61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ACC.L's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and ACC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACC.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs WAND.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, WAND.L has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while WAND.L trades at £63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas WAND.L's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WAND.L's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and WAND.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check WAND.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs D4T4.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, D4T4.L has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while D4T4.L trades at £177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas D4T4.L's P/E ratio is 35.40. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to D4T4.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to D4T4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check D4T4.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs EYE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, EYE.L has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while EYE.L trades at £227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas EYE.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EYE.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to EYE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check EYE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CLBS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CLBS.L has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CLBS.L trades at £170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CLBS.L's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLBS.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CLBS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CLBS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs PULS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, PULS.L has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while PULS.L trades at £42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas PULS.L's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PULS.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to PULS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check PULS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs OMG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, OMG.L has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while OMG.L trades at £46.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas OMG.L's P/E ratio is -46.20. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OMG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to OMG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check OMG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SPA.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SPA.L has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SPA.L trades at £47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SPA.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SPA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SPA.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SKL.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SKL.L has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SKL.L trades at £54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SKL.L's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKL.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SKL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SKL.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CRTA.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CRTA.L has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CRTA.L trades at £20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CRTA.L's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRTA.L's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CRTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CRTA.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SMRT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SMRT.L has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SMRT.L trades at £88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SMRT.L's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMRT.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SMRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SMRT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs GETB.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, GETB.L has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while GETB.L trades at £50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas GETB.L's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GETB.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to GETB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check GETB.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TEK.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TEK.L has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TEK.L trades at £7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TEK.L's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEK.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TEK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TEK.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0A8G.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0A8G.L has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0A8G.L trades at £6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0A8G.L's P/E ratio is -50.49. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0A8G.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 0A8G.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 0A8G.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CKT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CKT.L has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CKT.L trades at £15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CKT.L's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CKT.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CKT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CKT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ESYS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ESYS.L has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ESYS.L trades at £25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ESYS.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESYS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and ESYS.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESYS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ITIM.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ITIM.L has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ITIM.L trades at £50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ITIM.L's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITIM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ITIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ITIM.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CRDL.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CRDL.L has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CRDL.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CRDL.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRDL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CRDL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CRDL.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ZOO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ZOO.L has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ZOO.L trades at £13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ZOO.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZOO.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ZOO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ZOO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ALT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ALT.L has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ALT.L trades at £18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ALT.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ALT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs CHSS.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, CHSS.L has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while CHSS.L trades at £1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas CHSS.L's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHSS.L's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to CHSS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check CHSS.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs BIRD.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, BIRD.L has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while BIRD.L trades at £2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas BIRD.L's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BIRD.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to BIRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check BIRD.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs PEN.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, PEN.L has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while PEN.L trades at £28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas PEN.L's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to PEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check PEN.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ARC.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ARC.L has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ARC.L trades at £89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ARC.L's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARC.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and ARC.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARC.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs S247.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, S247.L has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while S247.L trades at £8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas S247.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to S247.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to S247.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check S247.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ING.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ING.L has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ING.L trades at £62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ING.L's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ING.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ING.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ING.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs MBT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, MBT.L has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while MBT.L trades at £1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas MBT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to MBT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check MBT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TERN.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TERN.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TERN.L trades at £0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TERN.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TERN.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TERN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TERN.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 4GBL.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 4GBL.L has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 4GBL.L trades at £22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 4GBL.L's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 4GBL.L's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to 4GBL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check 4GBL.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs EXR.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, EXR.L has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while EXR.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas EXR.L's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXR.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to EXR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check EXR.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs TIDE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, TIDE.L has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while TIDE.L trades at £65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas TIDE.L's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIDE.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to TIDE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check TIDE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs 0O8X.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, 0O8X.L has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while 0O8X.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas 0O8X.L's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0O8X.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and 0O8X.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0O8X.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs RDT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, RDT.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while RDT.L trades at £4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas RDT.L's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDT.L's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to RDT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check RDT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs RTOP.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, RTOP.L has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while RTOP.L trades at £4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas RTOP.L's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RTOP.L's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and RTOP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTOP.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ACRM.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ACRM.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ACRM.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ACRM.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACRM.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ACRM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ACRM.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs AIQ.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, AIQ.L has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while AIQ.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas AIQ.L's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIQ.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to AIQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check AIQ.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs OBC.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, OBC.L has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while OBC.L trades at £15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas OBC.L's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OBC.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and OBC.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check OBC.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SYME.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SYME.L has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SYME.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SYME.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYME.L's ROE of +6.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and SYME.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYME.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs DSG.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, DSG.L has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while DSG.L trades at £9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas DSG.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSG.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and DSG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSG.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs LOOP.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, LOOP.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while LOOP.L trades at £0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas LOOP.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LOOP.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and LOOP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOOP.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SORT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SORT.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SORT.L trades at £18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SORT.L's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SORT.L's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SORT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SORT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs MBO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, MBO.L has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while MBO.L trades at £1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas MBO.L's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MBO.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and MBO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs PTRO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, PTRO.L has a market cap of 954.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while PTRO.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas PTRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTRO.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and PTRO.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check PTRO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ENET.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ENET.L has a market cap of 881.4K. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ENET.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ENET.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENET.L's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to ENET.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check ENET.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs INX.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, INX.L has a market cap of 665.4K. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while INX.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas INX.L's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INX.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to INX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check INX.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs LSAI.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, LSAI.L has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while LSAI.L trades at £0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas LSAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LSAI.L's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L and LSAI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LSAI.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs MNO.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, MNO.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while MNO.L trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas MNO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNO.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to MNO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check MNO.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs VRE.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, VRE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while VRE.L trades at £18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas VRE.L's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRE.L's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to VRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check VRE.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs ATQT.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, ATQT.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while ATQT.L trades at £30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas ATQT.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATQT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and ATQT.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATQT.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs AVV.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, AVV.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while AVV.L trades at £3,219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas AVV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AVV.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and AVV.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check AVV.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs SIM.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, SIM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while SIM.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas SIM.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIM.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to SIM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check SIM.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs IDEA.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, IDEA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while IDEA.L trades at £349.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas IDEA.L's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDEA.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0GM9.L is less volatile compared to IDEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0GM9.L.Check IDEA.L's competition here
0GM9.L vs DMTR.L Comparison July 2025
0GM9.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0GM9.L stands at 880M. In comparison, DMTR.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0GM9.L is priced at £153.98, while DMTR.L trades at £0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0GM9.L currently has a P/E ratio of -47.53, whereas DMTR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0GM9.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DMTR.L's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0GM9.L has daily volatility of 0.00 and DMTR.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check DMTR.L's competition here