Hexagon Composites ASA
Hexagon Composites ASA (0EOF.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0EOF.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0EOF.L | £29.22 | -1.55% | 3.6B | -23.34 | -£1.25 | N/A |
| 0JCB.L | £55.48 | -0.08% | 22.9B | 12.23 | £4.54 | +3.98% |
| SKG.L | £4,180.00 | +4.32% | 21.9B | 16.99 | £2.46 | N/A |
| IPC.L | £3,390.09 | -0.14% | 19.2B | -875.00 | -£0.04 | +1.97% |
| SWR.L | £3,345.00 | +1.06% | 17.4B | 53.66 | £0.62 | +3.43% |
| 0KEZ.L | £193.00 | -0.39% | 17.4B | 19.74 | £9.78 | +2.58% |
| 0HL5.L | £57.10 | +0.83% | 15.8B | 16.73 | £3.41 | +1.40% |
| 0LW9.L | £51.64 | +4.37% | 13.1B | 17.39 | £2.97 | N/A |
| 0HJR.L | £166.33 | +0.40% | 13B | 19.08 | £8.72 | +2.14% |
| 0I4X.L | £97.71 | -0.42% | 11.4B | -22.51 | -£4.34 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
0EOF.L vs 0JCB.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0JCB.L has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0JCB.L trades at £55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0JCB.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0JCB.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0JCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0JCB.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs SKG.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SKG.L has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while SKG.L trades at £4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas SKG.L's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SKG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to SKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check SKG.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs IPC.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IPC.L has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while IPC.L trades at £3,390.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas IPC.L's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IPC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to IPC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check IPC.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs SWR.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SWR.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while SWR.L trades at £3,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas SWR.L's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SWR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to SWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check SWR.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0KEZ.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0KEZ.L has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0KEZ.L trades at £193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0KEZ.L's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0KEZ.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L and 0KEZ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0KEZ.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0HL5.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0HL5.L has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0HL5.L trades at £57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0HL5.L's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0HL5.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0HL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0HL5.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0LW9.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0LW9.L has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0LW9.L trades at £51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0LW9.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0LW9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0LW9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0LW9.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0HJR.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0HJR.L has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0HJR.L trades at £166.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0HJR.L's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0HJR.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0HJR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0HJR.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0I4X.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0I4X.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0I4X.L trades at £97.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0I4X.L's P/E ratio is -22.51. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0I4X.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0I4X.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0I4X.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs SMDS.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SMDS.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while SMDS.L trades at £582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas SMDS.L's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SMDS.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to SMDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check SMDS.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0HN1.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0HN1.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0HN1.L trades at £68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0HN1.L's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0HN1.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0HN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0HN1.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0CX9.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0CX9.L has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0CX9.L trades at £9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0CX9.L's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0CX9.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0CX9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0CX9.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0L4F.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0L4F.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0L4F.L trades at £28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0L4F.L's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0L4F.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L and 0L4F.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0L4F.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0K9W.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0K9W.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0K9W.L trades at £36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0K9W.L's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0K9W.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0K9W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0K9W.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0K9W.IL Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0K9W.IL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0K9W.IL trades at £30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0K9W.IL's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0K9W.IL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0K9W.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0K9W.IL's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0O7A.IL Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0O7A.IL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0O7A.IL trades at £3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0O7A.IL's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0O7A.IL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0O7A.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0O7A.IL's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0NNC.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0NNC.L has a market cap of 694.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0NNC.L trades at £7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0NNC.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0NNC.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to 0NNC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check 0NNC.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0O33.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0O33.L has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0O33.L trades at £9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0O33.L's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0O33.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L and 0O33.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0O33.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs 0D1X.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, 0D1X.L has a market cap of 548.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while 0D1X.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas 0D1X.L's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to 0D1X.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L and 0D1X.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0D1X.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs MACF.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MACF.L has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while MACF.L trades at £98.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas MACF.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MACF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to MACF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check MACF.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs SYM.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SYM.L has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while SYM.L trades at £12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas SYM.L's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SYM.L's ROE of +268.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to SYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check SYM.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs RBN.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RBN.L has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while RBN.L trades at £121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas RBN.L's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RBN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L and RBN.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBN.L's competition here
0EOF.L vs CRU.L Comparison August 2025
0EOF.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0EOF.L stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRU.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0EOF.L is priced at £29.22, while CRU.L trades at £10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0EOF.L currently has a P/E ratio of -23.34, whereas CRU.L's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, 0EOF.L's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRU.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0EOF.L is less volatile compared to CRU.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0EOF.L.Check CRU.L's competition here