Stora Enso Oyj
Stora Enso Oyj (0CX9.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0CX9.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0CX9.L | £9.42 | -4.66% | 7.2B | 5.30 | £1.79 | +2.55% |
| 0JCB.L | £55.48 | -0.08% | 22.9B | 12.23 | £4.54 | +4.03% |
| SKG.L | £4,180.00 | +4.32% | 21.9B | 16.99 | £2.46 | N/A |
| IPC.L | £3,496.75 | -7.25% | 17.9B | 38.58 | £0.88 | +2.03% |
| SWR.L | £3,352.50 | -1.97% | 17.3B | 53.39 | £0.62 | +3.45% |
| 0KEZ.L | £191.07 | -1.39% | 17.2B | 19.54 | £9.78 | +2.62% |
| 0HL5.L | £56.51 | -3.80% | 16B | 16.86 | £3.41 | +1.42% |
| 0HJR.L | £165.67 | -3.43% | 13.2B | 19.39 | £8.72 | +2.15% |
| 0LW9.L | £51.64 | +4.37% | 13.1B | 17.39 | £2.97 | N/A |
| 0I4X.L | £97.96 | -2.04% | 11.6B | -22.90 | -£4.34 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
0CX9.L vs 0JCB.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0JCB.L has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0JCB.L trades at £55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0JCB.L's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0JCB.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to 0JCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0JCB.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs SKG.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SKG.L has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while SKG.L trades at £4,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SKG.L's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to SKG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check SKG.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs IPC.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IPC.L has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while IPC.L trades at £3,496.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas IPC.L's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPC.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to IPC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check IPC.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs SWR.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SWR.L has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while SWR.L trades at £3,352.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SWR.L's P/E ratio is 53.39. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to SWR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check SWR.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0KEZ.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0KEZ.L has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0KEZ.L trades at £191.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0KEZ.L's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0KEZ.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0KEZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0KEZ.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0HL5.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0HL5.L has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0HL5.L trades at £56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0HL5.L's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0HL5.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to 0HL5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0HL5.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0HJR.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0HJR.L has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0HJR.L trades at £165.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0HJR.L's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0HJR.L's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0HJR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0HJR.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0LW9.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0LW9.L has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0LW9.L trades at £51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0LW9.L's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0LW9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to 0LW9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0LW9.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0I4X.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0I4X.L has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0I4X.L trades at £97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0I4X.L's P/E ratio is -22.90. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0I4X.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0I4X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0I4X.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs SMDS.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SMDS.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while SMDS.L trades at £582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SMDS.L's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMDS.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to SMDS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check SMDS.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0HN1.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0HN1.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0HN1.L trades at £68.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0HN1.L's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0HN1.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to 0HN1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0HN1.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0L4F.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0L4F.L has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0L4F.L trades at £28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0L4F.L's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0L4F.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to 0L4F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0L4F.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0EOF.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0EOF.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0EOF.L trades at £29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0EOF.L's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0EOF.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0EOF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0EOF.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0K9W.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0K9W.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0K9W.L trades at £36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0K9W.L's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0K9W.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0K9W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0K9W.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0K9W.IL Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0K9W.IL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0K9W.IL trades at £30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0K9W.IL's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0K9W.IL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0K9W.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0K9W.IL's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0O7A.IL Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0O7A.IL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0O7A.IL trades at £3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0O7A.IL's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0O7A.IL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0O7A.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0O7A.IL's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0NNC.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0NNC.L has a market cap of 729.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0NNC.L trades at £7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0NNC.L's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0NNC.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0NNC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0NNC.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0O33.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0O33.L has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0O33.L trades at £9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0O33.L's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0O33.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0O33.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0O33.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs 0D1X.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 0D1X.L has a market cap of 549.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while 0D1X.L trades at £29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas 0D1X.L's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 0D1X.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to 0D1X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check 0D1X.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs MACF.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MACF.L has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while MACF.L trades at £100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas MACF.L's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MACF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to MACF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check MACF.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs SYM.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SYM.L has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while SYM.L trades at £13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas SYM.L's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SYM.L's ROE of +268.80%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to SYM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check SYM.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs RBN.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RBN.L has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while RBN.L trades at £130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas RBN.L's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RBN.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is less volatile compared to RBN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check RBN.L's competition here
0CX9.L vs CRU.L Comparison August 2025
0CX9.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0CX9.L stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CRU.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0CX9.L is priced at £9.42, while CRU.L trades at £10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0CX9.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.30, whereas CRU.L's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, 0CX9.L's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRU.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, 0CX9.L is more volatile compared to CRU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0CX9.L.Check CRU.L's competition here