Inseego Corp.
Inseego Corp. (0A52.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0A52.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0A52.L | £6.35 | -8.69% | 100.4M | -11.59 | -£0.58 | N/A |
| 0K3H.L | £434.41 | -1.44% | 72.5B | 59.51 | £7.30 | +0.98% |
| 0LI9.L | £363.60 | -8.92% | 27B | 51.38 | £7.08 | +0.66% |
| 0RPZ.L | £406.30 | -2.19% | 20.4B | 50.48 | £8.05 | N/A |
| 0HYA.L | £87.99 | -4.88% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 0JPH.L | £39.95 | +0.13% | 13.4B | 39.01 | £1.02 | +2.20% |
| 0JVV.L | £102.52 | -8.93% | 7.1B | 41.71 | £2.46 | N/A |
| 0RDH.L | £20.54 | -1.78% | 4.2B | 12.19 | £1.69 | N/A |
| 0IJW.L | £17.17 | -2.72% | 2.3B | 46.41 | £0.37 | N/A |
| 0LPE.L | £16.09 | +2.70% | 2.1B | -75.24 | -£0.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
0A52.L vs 0K3H.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0K3H.L has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0K3H.L trades at £434.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0K3H.L's P/E ratio is 59.51. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0K3H.L's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0K3H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0K3H.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0LI9.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0LI9.L has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0LI9.L trades at £363.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0LI9.L's P/E ratio is 51.38. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0LI9.L's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0LI9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0LI9.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0RPZ.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0RPZ.L has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0RPZ.L trades at £406.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0RPZ.L's P/E ratio is 50.48. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0RPZ.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0RPZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0RPZ.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0HYA.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0HYA.L has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0HYA.L trades at £87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0HYA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0HYA.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0HYA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0HYA.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0JPH.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0JPH.L has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0JPH.L trades at £39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0JPH.L's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0JPH.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0JPH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0JPH.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0JVV.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0JVV.L has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0JVV.L trades at £102.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0JVV.L's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0JVV.L's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0JVV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0JVV.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0RDH.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0RDH.L has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0RDH.L trades at £20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0RDH.L's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0RDH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0RDH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0RDH.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0IJW.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0IJW.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0IJW.L trades at £17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0IJW.L's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0IJW.L's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0IJW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0IJW.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0LPE.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0LPE.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0LPE.L trades at £16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0LPE.L's P/E ratio is -75.24. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0LPE.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0LPE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0LPE.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0QNH.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0QNH.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0QNH.L trades at £110.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0QNH.L's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QNH.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0QNH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0QNH.L's competition here
0A52.L vs ETL.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, ETL.L has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while ETL.L trades at £4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas ETL.L's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ETL.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and ETL.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ETL.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0H14.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0H14.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0H14.L trades at £4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0H14.L's P/E ratio is 58.14. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0H14.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0H14.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0H14.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0J38.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0J38.L has a market cap of 943.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0J38.L trades at £8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0J38.L's P/E ratio is 51.48. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0J38.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and 0J38.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0J38.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0QNI.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0QNI.L has a market cap of 782.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0QNI.L trades at £115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0QNI.L's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QNI.L's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and 0QNI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0QNI.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0NQJ.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0NQJ.L has a market cap of 670.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0NQJ.L trades at £84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0NQJ.L's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0NQJ.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and 0NQJ.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0NQJ.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0OPY.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0OPY.L has a market cap of 345.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0OPY.L trades at £8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0OPY.L's P/E ratio is -175.78. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0OPY.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0OPY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0OPY.L's competition here
0A52.L vs FTC.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, FTC.L has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while FTC.L trades at £143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas FTC.L's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FTC.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to FTC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check FTC.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0QSV.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0QSV.L has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0QSV.L trades at £3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0QSV.L's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QSV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0QSV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0QSV.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0QVW.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0QVW.L has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0QVW.L trades at £5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0QVW.L's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0QVW.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to 0QVW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check 0QVW.L's competition here
0A52.L vs CLX.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, CLX.L has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while CLX.L trades at £48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas CLX.L's P/E ratio is -48.00. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLX.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to CLX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check CLX.L's competition here
0A52.L vs MWE.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, MWE.L has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while MWE.L trades at £46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas MWE.L's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MWE.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to MWE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check MWE.L's competition here
0A52.L vs CYAN.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, CYAN.L has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while CYAN.L trades at £7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas CYAN.L's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CYAN.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to CYAN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check CYAN.L's competition here
0A52.L vs PEB.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, PEB.L has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while PEB.L trades at £14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas PEB.L's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEB.L's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to PEB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check PEB.L's competition here
0A52.L vs GINV.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, GINV.L has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while GINV.L trades at £2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas GINV.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GINV.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and GINV.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GINV.L's competition here
0A52.L vs 0DO7.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, 0DO7.L has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while 0DO7.L trades at £0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas 0DO7.L's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 0DO7.L's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L and 0DO7.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0DO7.L's competition here
0A52.L vs TCM.L Comparison August 2025
0A52.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A52.L stands at 100.4M. In comparison, TCM.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A52.L is priced at £6.35, while TCM.L trades at £229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A52.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.59, whereas TCM.L's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, 0A52.L's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TCM.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A52.L is less volatile compared to TCM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A52.L.Check TCM.L's competition here