Prosus N.V.
Prosus N.V. 0A28.L Peers
See (0A28.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0A28.L | £68.83 | -0.53% | 246.6B | 5.71 | £12.05 | +0.13% |
| AUTO.L | £790.00 | +0.03% | 6.9B | 24.69 | £0.32 | +1.25% |
| RMV.L | £756.00 | -0.32% | 5.8B | 31.50 | £0.24 | +1.30% |
| BCG.L | £364.50 | +2.10% | 1.8B | 52.07 | £0.07 | +0.75% |
| MONY.L | £217.00 | +0.74% | 1.2B | 14.47 | £0.15 | +5.76% |
| VKCO.IL | £4.10 | +6.58% | 972M | -12.06 | -£0.34 | N/A |
| CNIC.L | £123.20 | +1.99% | 357.5M | -123.20 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| TIG.L | £64.00 | +0.16% | 153.8M | 10.67 | £0.06 | +0.88% |
| OTMP.L | £109.08 | +0.07% | 92.8M | -109.08 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| NWOR.L | £22.90 | -0.43% | 61.3M | 22.90 | £0.01 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
0A28.L vs AUTO.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, AUTO.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while AUTO.L trades at £790.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas AUTO.L's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUTO.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to AUTO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs RMV.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, RMV.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while RMV.L trades at £756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas RMV.L's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RMV.L's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to RMV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs BCG.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, BCG.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while BCG.L trades at £364.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BCG.L's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCG.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to BCG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs MONY.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, MONY.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while MONY.L trades at £217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MONY.L's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONY.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to MONY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs VKCO.IL Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, VKCO.IL has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while VKCO.IL trades at £4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas VKCO.IL's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VKCO.IL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to VKCO.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs CNIC.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, CNIC.L has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while CNIC.L trades at £123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas CNIC.L's P/E ratio is -123.20. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNIC.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0A28.L has daily volatility of 0.89 and CNIC.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0A28.L vs TIG.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, TIG.L has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while TIG.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas TIG.L's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to TIG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs OTMP.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, OTMP.L has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while OTMP.L trades at £109.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas OTMP.L's P/E ratio is -109.08. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTMP.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is more volatile compared to OTMP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs NWOR.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, NWOR.L has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while NWOR.L trades at £22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas NWOR.L's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWOR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is more volatile compared to NWOR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs MOS.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, MOS.L has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while MOS.L trades at £0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MOS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOS.L's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to MOS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs BOOM.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, BOOM.L has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while BOOM.L trades at £360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BOOM.L's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOOM.L's ROE of -3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to BOOM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs BBSN.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, BBSN.L has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while BBSN.L trades at £2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas BBSN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBSN.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to BBSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs SMV.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, SMV.L has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while SMV.L trades at £53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SMV.L's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMV.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0A28.L has daily volatility of 0.89 and SMV.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0A28.L vs 7DIG.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, 7DIG.L has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while 7DIG.L trades at £0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas 7DIG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 7DIG.L's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is more volatile compared to 7DIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs SEEN.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, SEEN.L has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while SEEN.L trades at £4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SEEN.L's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SEEN.L's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to SEEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs DBOX.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, DBOX.L has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while DBOX.L trades at £4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DBOX.L's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBOX.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to DBOX.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs SCGL.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, SCGL.L has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while SCGL.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas SCGL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCGL.L's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to SCGL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs DISH.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, DISH.L has a market cap of 525.3K. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while DISH.L trades at £0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas DISH.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DISH.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is more volatile compared to DISH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs MAIL.IL Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, MAIL.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while MAIL.IL trades at £12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas MAIL.IL's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAIL.IL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is less volatile compared to MAIL.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.
0A28.L vs 0XI7.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, 0XI7.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while 0XI7.L trades at £27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas 0XI7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 0XI7.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0A28.L has daily volatility of 0.89 and 0XI7.L has daily volatility of N/A.
0A28.L vs IME.L Comparison
0A28.L plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A28.L stands at 246.6B. In comparison, IME.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A28.L is priced at £68.83, while IME.L trades at £17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A28.L currently has a P/E ratio of 5.71, whereas IME.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, 0A28.L's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IME.L's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A28.L is more volatile compared to IME.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A28.L.