Ellington Financial Inc.
Ellington Financial Inc. (0A26.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (0A26.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0A26.L | £12.59 | -0.16% | 1.3B | 8.44 | £1.49 | +12.39% |
| 0QYU.L | £147.86 | +2.68% | 236B | 18.82 | £7.86 | +2.55% |
| 0QZZ.L | £1,144.72 | +1.60% | 177.1B | 28.74 | £39.80 | +1.81% |
| 0L3I.L | £95.99 | +0.21% | 174.2B | 34.65 | £2.77 | +1.10% |
| 0KYY.L | £551.98 | -0.11% | 168.5B | 39.43 | £14.00 | +0.68% |
| 0HT4.L | £220.93 | +4.28% | 141.3B | 8.64 | £25.57 | +1.09% |
| 0R3C.L | £148.80 | +0.00% | 127.1B | 14.89 | £10.00 | +0.96% |
| 0Z1W.L | £139.35 | +1.75% | 124.2B | 30.10 | £4.63 | +0.52% |
| 0JC3.L | £179.61 | +0.23% | 102.8B | 24.94 | £7.20 | +1.04% |
| 0HR2.L | £269.76 | -1.53% | 97.2B | 35.31 | £7.64 | +3.91% |
Stock Comparison
0A26.L vs 0QYU.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QYU.L has a market cap of 236B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QYU.L trades at £147.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QYU.L's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QYU.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QYU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QYU.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QZZ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QZZ.L has a market cap of 177.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QZZ.L trades at £1,144.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QZZ.L's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QZZ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0QZZ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QZZ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0L3I.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0L3I.L has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0L3I.L trades at £95.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0L3I.L's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0L3I.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0L3I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0L3I.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0KYY.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0KYY.L has a market cap of 168.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0KYY.L trades at £551.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0KYY.L's P/E ratio is 39.43. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KYY.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0KYY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0KYY.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HT4.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HT4.L has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HT4.L trades at £220.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HT4.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HT4.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HT4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HT4.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0R3C.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0R3C.L has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0R3C.L trades at £148.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0R3C.L's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R3C.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0R3C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0R3C.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0Z1W.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0Z1W.L has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0Z1W.L trades at £139.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0Z1W.L's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0Z1W.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0Z1W.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0Z1W.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0JC3.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JC3.L has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0JC3.L trades at £179.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0JC3.L's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JC3.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0JC3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0JC3.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HR2.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HR2.L has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HR2.L trades at £269.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HR2.L's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HR2.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HR2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HR2.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0K36.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0K36.L has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0K36.L trades at £510.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0K36.L's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K36.L's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0K36.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0K36.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HLQ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HLQ.L has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HLQ.L trades at £103.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HLQ.L's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HLQ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0HLQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HLQ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0K4T.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0K4T.L has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0K4T.L trades at £94.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0K4T.L's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K4T.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0K4T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0K4T.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0IBC.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0IBC.L has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0IBC.L trades at £202.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0IBC.L's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IBC.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0IBC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0IBC.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0KU1.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0KU1.L has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0KU1.L trades at £165.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0KU1.L's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KU1.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0KU1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0KU1.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0L9G.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0L9G.L has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0L9G.L trades at £115.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0L9G.L's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0L9G.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0L9G.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0L9G.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QOQ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QOQ.L has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QOQ.L trades at £1,114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QOQ.L's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QOQ.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0QOQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QOQ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0LC3.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0LC3.L has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0LC3.L trades at £73.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0LC3.L's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0LC3.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0LC3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0LC3.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HQN.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HQN.L has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HQN.L trades at £248.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HQN.L's P/E ratio is 53.22. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HQN.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0HQN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HQN.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0K91.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0K91.L has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0K91.L trades at £130.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0K91.L's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K91.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0K91.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0K91.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RH1.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RH1.L has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RH1.L trades at £86.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RH1.L's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RH1.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0RH1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RH1.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0KNY.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0KNY.L has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0KNY.L trades at £107.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0KNY.L's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KNY.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0KNY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0KNY.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HHP.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HHP.L has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HHP.L trades at £22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HHP.L's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HHP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HHP.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RT6.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RT6.L has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RT6.L trades at £25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RT6.L's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RT6.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0RT6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RT6.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HD0.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HD0.L has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HD0.L trades at £40.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HD0.L's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HD0.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0HD0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HD0.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0SAY.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0SAY.L has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0SAY.L trades at £53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0SAY.L's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0SAY.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0SAY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0SAY.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QI9.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QI9.L has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QI9.L trades at £79.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QI9.L's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QI9.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QI9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QI9.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0UAN.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0UAN.L has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0UAN.L trades at £21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0UAN.L's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0UAN.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0UAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0UAN.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QLD.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QLD.L has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QLD.L trades at £529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QLD.L's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLD.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0QLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QLD.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RPW.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RPW.L has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RPW.L trades at £44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RPW.L's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RPW.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0RPW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RPW.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0JXQ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JXQ.L has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0JXQ.L trades at £65.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0JXQ.L's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JXQ.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0JXQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0JXQ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RGB.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RGB.L has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RGB.L trades at £120.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RGB.L's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RGB.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0RGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RGB.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HA8.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HA8.L has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HA8.L trades at £84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HA8.L's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HA8.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HA8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HA8.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QJX.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QJX.L has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QJX.L trades at £15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QJX.L's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QJX.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QJX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QJX.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0IZM.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0IZM.L has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0IZM.L trades at £6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0IZM.L's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0IZM.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0IZM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0IZM.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0J2Z.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0J2Z.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0J2Z.L trades at £28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0J2Z.L's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0J2Z.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0J2Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0J2Z.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0J4M.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0J4M.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0J4M.L trades at £19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0J4M.L's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0J4M.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0J4M.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0J4M.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RP0.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RP0.L has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RP0.L trades at £19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RP0.L's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RP0.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0RP0.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RP0.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QPJ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QPJ.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QPJ.L trades at £92.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QPJ.L's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QPJ.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QPJ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RL4.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RL4.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RL4.L trades at £30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RL4.L's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RL4.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0RL4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RL4.L's competition here
0A26.L vs GCVG.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GCVG.L has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while GCVG.L trades at £35.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas GCVG.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GCVG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to GCVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check GCVG.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HHU.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HHU.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HHU.L trades at £15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HHU.L's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HHU.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HHU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HHU.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0O2B.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0O2B.L has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0O2B.L trades at £46.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0O2B.L's P/E ratio is 107.50. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0O2B.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0O2B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0O2B.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0R25.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0R25.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0R25.L trades at £2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0R25.L's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R25.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0R25.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0R25.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0K5R.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0K5R.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0K5R.L trades at £12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0K5R.L's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K5R.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0K5R.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0K5R.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QOC.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QOC.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QOC.L trades at £171.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QOC.L's P/E ratio is -15.32. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QOC.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QOC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QOC.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0N5Z.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0N5Z.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0N5Z.L trades at £28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0N5Z.L's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0N5Z.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0N5Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0N5Z.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0KH0.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0KH0.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0KH0.L trades at £10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0KH0.L's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0KH0.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0KH0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0KH0.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0JTZ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JTZ.L has a market cap of 955.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0JTZ.L trades at £70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0JTZ.L's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JTZ.L's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0JTZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0JTZ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0NDP.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0NDP.L has a market cap of 792.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0NDP.L trades at £7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0NDP.L's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0NDP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0NDP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0NDP.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0J0N.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0J0N.L has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0J0N.L trades at £13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0J0N.L's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0J0N.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0J0N.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0J0N.L's competition here
0A26.L vs PEYS.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PEYS.L has a market cap of 603.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while PEYS.L trades at £873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas PEYS.L's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEYS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to PEYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check PEYS.L's competition here
0A26.L vs JPXU.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JPXU.L has a market cap of 587.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while JPXU.L trades at £236.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas JPXU.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPXU.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to JPXU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check JPXU.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0DK7.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0DK7.L has a market cap of 538.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0DK7.L trades at £13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0DK7.L's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0DK7.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0DK7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0DK7.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0JD3.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0JD3.L has a market cap of 514.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0JD3.L trades at £7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0JD3.L's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0JD3.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0JD3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0JD3.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0R7T.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0R7T.L has a market cap of 489.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0R7T.L trades at £10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0R7T.L's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R7T.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0R7T.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0R7T.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RG7.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RG7.L has a market cap of 473.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RG7.L trades at £85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RG7.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RG7.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0RG7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RG7.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0OPJ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0OPJ.L has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0OPJ.L trades at £6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0OPJ.L's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0OPJ.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0OPJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0OPJ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0E1L.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0E1L.L has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0E1L.L trades at £1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0E1L.L's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0E1L.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0E1L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0E1L.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0K7X.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0K7X.L has a market cap of 325.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0K7X.L trades at £12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0K7X.L's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0K7X.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0K7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0K7X.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QNE.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QNE.L has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QNE.L trades at £16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QNE.L's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QNE.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0QNE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QNE.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HO6.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HO6.L has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HO6.L trades at £3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HO6.L's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HO6.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HO6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HO6.L's competition here
0A26.L vs OIT.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OIT.L has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while OIT.L trades at £150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas OIT.L's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OIT.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to OIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check OIT.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0RWM.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0RWM.L has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0RWM.L trades at £37.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0RWM.L's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0RWM.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to 0RWM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0RWM.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0R4W.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0R4W.L has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0R4W.L trades at £7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0R4W.L's P/E ratio is -660.00. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0R4W.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0R4W.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0R4W.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0QLZ.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0QLZ.L has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0QLZ.L trades at £8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0QLZ.L's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0QLZ.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0QLZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0QLZ.L's competition here
0A26.L vs AJG.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AJG.L has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while AJG.L trades at £172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas AJG.L's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AJG.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. 0A26.L has daily volatility of 1.43 and AJG.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check AJG.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0XWD.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0XWD.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0XWD.L trades at £1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0XWD.L's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0XWD.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0XWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0XWD.L's competition here
0A26.L vs JARA.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JARA.L has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while JARA.L trades at £72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas JARA.L's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JARA.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to JARA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check JARA.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0LHX.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0LHX.L has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0LHX.L trades at £2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0LHX.L's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0LHX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0LHX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0LHX.L's competition here
0A26.L vs 0HKM.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, 0HKM.L has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while 0HKM.L trades at £4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas 0HKM.L's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 0HKM.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to 0HKM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check 0HKM.L's competition here
0A26.L vs SSIF.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SSIF.L has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while SSIF.L trades at £4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SSIF.L's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSIF.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to SSIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check SSIF.L's competition here
0A26.L vs FTFX.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTFX.L has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while FTFX.L trades at £25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas FTFX.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTFX.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to FTFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check FTFX.L's competition here
0A26.L vs SLS.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLS.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while SLS.L trades at £732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SLS.L's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLS.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to SLS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check SLS.L's competition here
0A26.L vs SIGB.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SIGB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while SIGB.L trades at £0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas SIGB.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGB.L's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to SIGB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check SIGB.L's competition here
0A26.L vs WESG.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WESG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while WESG.L trades at £35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas WESG.L's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WESG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to WESG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check WESG.L's competition here
0A26.L vs BHGU.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BHGU.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while BHGU.L trades at £19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas BHGU.L's P/E ratio is 3.81. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHGU.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to BHGU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check BHGU.L's competition here
0A26.L vs ANW.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANW.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while ANW.L trades at £398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas ANW.L's P/E ratio is 1.21. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANW.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to ANW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check ANW.L's competition here
0A26.L vs JESC.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JESC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while JESC.L trades at £499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas JESC.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JESC.L's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to JESC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check JESC.L's competition here
0A26.L vs ELTA.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELTA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while ELTA.L trades at £63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas ELTA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELTA.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to ELTA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check ELTA.L's competition here
0A26.L vs NUC.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NUC.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while NUC.L trades at £191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas NUC.L's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUC.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is more volatile compared to NUC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check NUC.L's competition here
0A26.L vs AIF.L Comparison August 2025
0A26.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 0A26.L stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIF.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 0A26.L is priced at £12.59, while AIF.L trades at £367.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
0A26.L currently has a P/E ratio of 8.44, whereas AIF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 0A26.L's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIF.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 0A26.L is less volatile compared to AIF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0A26.L.Check AIF.L's competition here