China Tontine Wines Group Limited

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 6979.HK has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 6979.HK trades at HK$6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 6979.HK's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 6979.HK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 6979.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 0530.HK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0530.HK trades at HK$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 0530.HK's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0530.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 0530.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 0472.HK has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0472.HK trades at HK$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 0472.HK's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0472.HK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 0472.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 0828.HK has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0828.HK trades at HK$0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 0828.HK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0828.HK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 0828.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 8509.HK has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8509.HK trades at HK$0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 8509.HK's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 8509.HK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 8509.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 1389.HK has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 1389.HK trades at HK$0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 1389.HK's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 1389.HK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 1389.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 8146.HK has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8146.HK trades at HK$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 8146.HK's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 8146.HK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 8146.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 8057.HK has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 8057.HK trades at HK$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 8057.HK's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 8057.HK's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is more volatile compared to 8057.HK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.

0389.HK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, 0389.HK stands at 129.7M. In comparison, 0886.HK has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 0389.HK is priced at HK$0.43, while 0886.HK trades at HK$0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

0389.HK currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas 0886.HK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, 0389.HK's ROE is -0.18%, compared to 0886.HK's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 0389.HK is less volatile compared to 0886.HK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 0389.HK.