Advertisement

Meyka AI - Contribute to AI-powered stock and crypto research platform
Meyka Stock Market API - Real-time financial data and AI insights for developers
Advertise on Meyka - Reach investors and traders across 10 global markets
Global Market Insights

^NDX Today: SaaS Rout on AI Disruption, $1T Wiped – February 6

February 6, 2026
6 min read
Share with:

SaaS stocks are under pressure today as AI disruption drives a sharp software selloff. The tech‑heavy ^NDX trades near 25,552, down 1.28%, after a CNBC test showed Anthropic’s Claude building a Monday.com‑style app in under an hour for only a few dollars. That “Claude cowork” moment fueled worries that add‑on workflow tools can be replicated cheaply, threatening moats and margins. Investors are rotating toward need‑to‑have software and equal‑weight benchmarks. For Japan, where many households own U.S. tech via local funds, today’s shift is a clear signal to recheck exposure and risk controls.

Nasdaq 100 slips as software lags

SaaS stocks led declines as the index sits around 25,552 (-1.28%), with a session range of 25,456 to 25,823. The 50‑day average is 25,372 and the 200‑day is 23,536, so trend support remains below. RSI is 57.9 and ADX is 13.6, signaling momentum without a strong trend. Bollinger mid‑band is 25,393; watch that level for near‑term direction.

Sponsored

Weak breadth from SaaS stocks contrasts with steadier “need‑to‑have” software and semis. Equal‑weight tech has been holding up better, hinting at rotation away from mega‑cap software winners. For Japan investors using Nasdaq‑tracking funds, this mix shift matters more than the headline index move because factor tilts can dampen or amplify drawdowns.

ATR near 310 points outlines a wide daily range. Money Flow Index at 70 signals buying pressure even as prices dip, while OBV remains elevated. For SaaS stocks, that mix suggests rotational selling rather than broad de‑risking. Watch a break of 25,393 or 25,823 to gauge whether buyers or sellers control the next leg.

Why AI is compressing software multiples

A CNBC trial showed Anthropic’s Claude building a Monday‑style project app in under an hour for just a few dollars, a vivid example of “vibe‑coding” that could replicate simple workflows. That puts many SaaS stocks at risk if core tasks can be produced cheaply by foundation models. See the test details here: CNBC.

Investors reacted by marking down AI‑exposed names, with roughly $1 trillion wiped from software market value, according to Yahoo Finance. For SaaS stocks, this points to multiple compression as markets price lower moats and thinner margins. The shift pushes capital toward security, data platforms, and semiconductors that feel more “need‑to‑have.”

If a model can reproduce “on‑top‑of‑work” features, customers may push back on per‑seat pricing or demand usage tiers. That squeezes gross margin and sales efficiency. SaaS stocks with heavy add‑on revenues face the most risk, while platforms tied to compliance, security, or core databases keep stronger pricing power and stickier net retention.

Implications for Japan portfolios

Japan investors often hold U.S. tech through Nasdaq 100 index funds and ETFs, while also owning domestic workflow names like Money Forward, freee, Sansan, and Cybozu. If AI copies basic tasks, these SaaS stocks could see slower seat growth and discount pressure. Review position sizes and how much of your portfolio relies on similar workflows.

Yen swings can offset or magnify U.S. equity moves. Consider the gap between hedged and unhedged Nasdaq trackers, and whether futures or options fit your policy for drawdown control. For SaaS stocks exposure, simple rules like partial hedges at set volatility thresholds can help keep risk inside target bands.

Security, identity, observability, data warehousing, and payments rails look more “need‑to‑have” than workflow add‑ons. Semiconductors and AI infrastructure may benefit if software margins compress. For SaaS stocks, favor vendors with high compliance value, low feature imitation risk, and clear AI monetization paths rather than one‑off copilots.

Tactical roadmap for the next week

For traders, 25,393 (Bollinger mid) is a pivot. Above 25,823 and toward 25,947 (upper band) suggests buyers back in control. First support is 25,456; a break risks a test of 24,840 (lower band). ATR near 310 frames intraday swings. Our baseline monthly model sits near 25,367, close to spot, implying range trading unless news shocks.

For SaaS stocks, focus on net revenue retention, gross margin, sales efficiency (magic number), and AI attach rates. Track whether customers accept usage pricing and whether seat‑based plans see discounting. For Japan names, the same KPIs apply, plus domestic churn trends as SME budgets react to AI‑driven alternatives.

Bull case: vendors ship durable AI workflows tied to data, identity, or compliance, supporting pricing power. Base case: mixed adoption, with usage pricing offsetting some pressure. Bear case: rapid feature copy, falling net retention, and heavier sales costs. Position sizes in SaaS stocks should reflect which scenario you believe and your risk budget.

Final Thoughts

Today’s selloff shows how quickly AI can challenge software moats. For Japan investors, the message is clear: reassess exposure to workflow‑heavy SaaS stocks, tilt toward need‑to‑have platforms, and size positions so a multi‑quarter reset does not derail your plan. Use simple guardrails: map holdings by AI imitation risk, track KPIs like net retention and gross margin, and set levels for trims or adds. On the index, watch 25,393 as a pivot and 25,823 as near resistance. If the tape stays range‑bound, equal‑weight and quality tilts can buffer swings while you wait for clearer earnings evidence on pricing power and AI monetization.

FAQs

What triggered today’s software selloff?

A live test showed Anthropic’s Claude building a Monday‑style app in under an hour for a few dollars, highlighting how AI could recreate simple workflows. That raised moat and margin concerns. Investors rotated from workflow‑heavy SaaS stocks toward need‑to‑have software, semiconductors, and equal‑weight exposures, pressuring the Nasdaq 100.

Are SaaS stocks structurally broken by AI?

Not necessarily. Vendors with compliance, security, data control, or deep integrations still have strong moats. The risk is highest for “on‑top‑of‑work” features that models can copy. Watch pricing power, net retention, and AI attach rates. Clear usage‑based monetization and sticky platforms can balance competitive pressure from general‑purpose models.

How can Japan investors reduce drawdowns in U.S. tech exposure?

Use position sizing and simple rules: partial hedges when volatility rises, add only above key moving averages, or trim near resistance. Prefer funds with quality or equal‑weight tilts to avoid concentration. For SaaS stocks, emphasize businesses with hard‑to‑copy value and monitor KPIs each quarter before adding size.

Which metrics matter most this quarter for SaaS?

Focus on net revenue retention, gross margin, sales efficiency, AI attach rates, and customer acquisition costs. They show whether pricing power holds as AI alternatives grow. Also listen for usage‑based plans replacing per‑seat pricing. For Japan names, add churn and SME budget trends to the checklist.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
Meyka Newsletter
Get analyst ratings, AI forecasts, and market updates in your inbox every morning.
12% average open rate and growing
Trusted by 4,200+ active investors
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask our AI about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)