Zambeef Products PLC

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0JZS.L has a market cap of 19.90B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0JZS.L trades at $76.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0JZS.L's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0JZS.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0JZS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0J5Z.L has a market cap of 16.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0J5Z.L trades at $29.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0J5Z.L's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0J5Z.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0J5Z.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, KYGA.L has a market cap of 15.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while KYGA.L trades at $95.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas KYGA.L's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KYGA.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to KYGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, ABF.L has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while ABF.L trades at $2,112.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas ABF.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABF.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to ABF.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0L7F.L has a market cap of 11.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0L7F.L trades at $112.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0L7F.L's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0L7F.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0L7F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0I2P.L has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0I2P.L trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0I2P.L's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0I2P.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0I2P.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0HST.L has a market cap of 10.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0HST.L trades at $35.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0HST.L's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0HST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0HST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0F4O.L has a market cap of 7.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0F4O.L trades at $8,750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0F4O.L's P/E ratio is 78.44. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0F4O.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0F4O.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, GLB.L has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while GLB.L trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas GLB.L's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to GLB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, CWK.L has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while CWK.L trades at $5,360.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas CWK.L's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CWK.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to CWK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0RJ6.L has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0RJ6.L trades at $80.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0RJ6.L's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RJ6.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0RJ6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, TATE.L has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while TATE.L trades at $586.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas TATE.L's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATE.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to TATE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, PFD.L has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while PFD.L trades at $203.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas PFD.L's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to PFD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0RFX.L has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0RFX.L trades at $274.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0RFX.L's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0RFX.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0RFX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, AGRO.L has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while AGRO.L trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas AGRO.L's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGRO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to AGRO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, BAKK.L has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while BAKK.L trades at $188.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas BAKK.L's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAKK.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to BAKK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0MFY.L has a market cap of 899.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0MFY.L trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0MFY.L's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0MFY.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0MFY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0DTK.L has a market cap of 895.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0DTK.L trades at $67.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0DTK.L's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0DTK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0DTK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, GNC.L has a market cap of 821.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while GNC.L trades at $190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas GNC.L's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNC.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to GNC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, HFG.L has a market cap of 804.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while HFG.L trades at $895.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas HFG.L's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HFG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to HFG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, DVO.L has a market cap of 562.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while DVO.L trades at $329.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas DVO.L's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DVO.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to DVO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, EFID.L has a market cap of 436.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while EFID.L trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas EFID.L's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EFID.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to EFID.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0A20.L has a market cap of 401.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0A20.L trades at $60.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0A20.L's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0A20.L's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0A20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0CIJ.L has a market cap of 348.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0CIJ.L trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0CIJ.L's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0CIJ.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0CIJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, FIF.L has a market cap of 143.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while FIF.L trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas FIF.L's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZAM.L has daily volatility of 2.47 and FIF.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0J2I.L has a market cap of 141.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0J2I.L trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0J2I.L's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0J2I.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to 0J2I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0ISM.L has a market cap of 106.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0ISM.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0ISM.L's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0ISM.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0ISM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0QM6.L has a market cap of 104.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0QM6.L trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0QM6.L's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QM6.L's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0QM6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0M0Q.L has a market cap of 93.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0M0Q.L trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0M0Q.L's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0M0Q.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to 0M0Q.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, ANP.L has a market cap of 75.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while ANP.L trades at $450.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas ANP.L's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to ANP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, SALT.L has a market cap of 25.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while SALT.L trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas SALT.L's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SALT.L's ROE of +30.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to SALT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, UKR.L has a market cap of 1.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while UKR.L trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas UKR.L's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UKR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to UKR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, OHT.L has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while OHT.L trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas OHT.L's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OHT.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is less volatile compared to OHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0QQI.L has a market cap of 962781.00. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0QQI.L trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0QQI.L's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0QQI.L's ROE of -5.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0QQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, SIS.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while SIS.L trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas SIS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZAM.L has daily volatility of 2.47 and SIS.L has daily volatility of N/A.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, 0F2Q.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while 0F2Q.L trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas 0F2Q.L's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 0F2Q.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to 0F2Q.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.

ZAM.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZAM.L stands at 12.02M. In comparison, BD15.L comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ZAM.L is priced at $4.00, while BD15.L trades at $99.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZAM.L currently has a P/E ratio of 4.00, whereas BD15.L's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZAM.L's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BD15.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZAM.L is more volatile compared to BD15.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZAM.L.