Xtrackers MSCI EM Asia ESG Screened Swap UCITS ETF

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.87T. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at $343.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.49T. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at $297.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.38T. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at $284.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 3SUR.DE has a market cap of 481.43B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 3SUR.DE trades at $1,783.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3SUR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 3SUR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to 3SUR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 151.37B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while BBN1.F trades at $134.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.24B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while BLQA.DE trades at $845.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 99.97B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SXR8.DE trades at $556.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 90.98B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EUNL.DE trades at $99.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 64.95B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VUAA.DE trades at $99.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 63.15B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VUSA.DE trades at $99.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 48.83B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SXRZ.DE trades at $237.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 40.13B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XJSE.DE trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 35.89B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VGWL.DE trades at $127.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 34.03B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VWCE.DE trades at $129.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VGWL.F trades at $102.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.82B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while A4S.DE trades at $275.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 26.79B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at $1,038.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 26.69B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while P500.DE trades at $1,034.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 25.09B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IS3N.DE trades at $33.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.64B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IBC3.F trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 22.35B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IBC3.DE trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 18.73B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while PPFB.SG trades at $56.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XDWD.DE trades at $108.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XDWL.DE trades at $91.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 17.96B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while TR1.DU trades at $86.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.39B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IUSA.DE trades at $52.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.21B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IUSZ.DE trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 14.10B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SXRV.DE trades at $1,067.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.35B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IUSQ.DE trades at $82.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SPY5.DE trades at $522.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XDEW.DE trades at $86.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 10.89B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XDEE.DE trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 10.42B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while QDVE.DE trades at $29.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while DWS.DE trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EUNK.DE trades at $85.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EUN5.DE trades at $120.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while OM3L.DE trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at $34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while H4ZJ.DE trades at $34.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IQQY.DE trades at $34.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 8.91B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while STXH.DE trades at $139.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while LYP6.DE trades at $258.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XD9U.DE trades at $153.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XD9D.DE trades at $20.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while D5BM.DE trades at $104.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XD9E.DE trades at $117.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while JREU.DE trades at $52.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 8.49B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XS5E.DE trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXIC.DE trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXS1.DE trades at $195.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXW1.DE trades at $54.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.04B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXIE.DE trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 7.99B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXSA.DE trades at $54.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at $60.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EQQQ.DE trades at $456.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 7.44B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SGAS.DE trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IQQW.DE trades at $72.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 7.40B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VGVF.DE trades at $101.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VGVE.DE trades at $98.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SPPW.DE trades at $36.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while LYYA.DE trades at $339.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EDMU.DE trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while DBXE.DE trades at $57.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VGWD.DE trades at $64.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 6.98B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 2B7K.DE trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while DBXW.DE trades at $106.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while LCUW.DE trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.58B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EXIC.F trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while DBXD.DE trades at $221.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at $53.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.41B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while H4ZF.DE trades at $52.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IBCF.DE has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IBCF.DE trades at $121.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBCF.DE's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBCF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IBCF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XMME.F trades at $46.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, DBXU.DE has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while DBXU.DE trades at $173.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBXU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXU.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to DBXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while TCC4.DE trades at $222.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XZMU.DE trades at $56.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EMNU.DE has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EMNU.DE trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNU.DE's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EMNU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EDM6.DE has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EDM6.DE trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDM6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDM6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EDM6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XWEH.DE trades at $41.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XMME.DE trades at $55.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, AUM5.DE has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while AUM5.DE trades at $103.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUM5.DE's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUM5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to AUM5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, XIEE.DE has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while XIEE.DE trades at $78.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XIEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to XIEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, H1D5.DE has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while H1D5.DE trades at $139.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H1D5.DE's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H1D5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to H1D5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SC0J.DE has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SC0J.DE trades at $106.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SC0J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, QDV5.DE has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while QDV5.DE trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QDV5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDV5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to QDV5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SC0J.F has a market cap of 5.42B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SC0J.F trades at $82.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC0J.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC0J.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SC0J.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, AMEW.DE has a market cap of 5.36B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while AMEW.DE trades at $543.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMEW.DE's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMEW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to AMEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, EUNN.DE has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while EUNN.DE trades at $53.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUNN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to EUNN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, UIMM.DE has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while UIMM.DE trades at $150.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIMM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UIMM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to UIMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SEAC.DE has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SEAC.DE trades at $30.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEAC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SEAC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, VUKE.DE has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while VUKE.DE trades at $44.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUKE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUKE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to VUKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IE00BYML9W36.SG has a market cap of 5.21B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IE00BYML9W36.SG trades at $48.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IE00BYML9W36.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IE00BYML9W36.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IUSN.DE has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IUSN.DE trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSN.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IUSN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while D500.DE trades at $48.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, F500.DE has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while F500.DE trades at $147.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to F500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to F500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, IQQE.DE has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while IQQE.DE trades at $40.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQQE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to IQQE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, SXRT.DE has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while SXRT.DE trades at $203.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXRT.DE's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRT.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to SXRT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.

XMA1.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XMA1.F stands at 581.70M. In comparison, 10AI.DE has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, XMA1.F is priced at $18.55, while 10AI.DE trades at $69.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XMA1.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 10AI.DE's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, XMA1.F's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 10AI.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XMA1.F is less volatile compared to 10AI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XMA1.F.