Whitbread plc
Whitbread plc WTB.L Peers
See (WTB.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTB.L | $2,838.00 | +1.00% | 4.99B | 20.13 | $1.41 | +3.50% |
| 0JYW.L | $271.63 | +5.68% | 72.04B | 60.35 | $4.50 | +0.93% |
| 0J5I.L | $251.89 | +4.04% | 59.87B | 97.29 | $2.59 | +0.24% |
| 0QYD.L | $147.03 | +0.03% | 40.87B | 26.72 | $5.50 | +1.85% |
| 0QY4.L | $42.42 | +6.60% | 29.97B | 17.54 | $2.42 | +2.12% |
| IHG.L | $9,018.00 | +4.74% | 13.98B | 31.31 | $2.88 | +1.19% |
| 0QYK.L | $94.44 | +8.18% | 9.87B | -16.47 | -$5.74 | +1.06% |
| 0UC3.L | $19.12 | +8.03% | 8.21B | -1.80 | -$10.63 | N/A |
| 0KJD.L | $94.21 | -1.03% | 7.92B | 149.54 | $0.63 | N/A |
| 0OHG.L | $6.32 | -0.16% | 2.75B | -29.81 | -$0.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WTB.L vs 0JYW.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0JYW.L has a market cap of 72.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0JYW.L trades at $271.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0JYW.L's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0JYW.L's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to 0JYW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0J5I.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0J5I.L has a market cap of 59.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0J5I.L trades at $251.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0J5I.L's P/E ratio is 97.29. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0J5I.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to 0J5I.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0QYD.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0QYD.L has a market cap of 40.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0QYD.L trades at $147.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0QYD.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QYD.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to 0QYD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0QY4.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0QY4.L has a market cap of 29.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0QY4.L trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0QY4.L's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QY4.L's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to 0QY4.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs IHG.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, IHG.L has a market cap of 13.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while IHG.L trades at $9,018.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas IHG.L's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHG.L's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to IHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0QYK.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0QYK.L has a market cap of 9.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0QYK.L trades at $94.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0QYK.L's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QYK.L's ROE of -2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to 0QYK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0UC3.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0UC3.L has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0UC3.L trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0UC3.L's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0UC3.L's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to 0UC3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0KJD.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0KJD.L has a market cap of 7.92B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0KJD.L trades at $94.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0KJD.L's P/E ratio is 149.54. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0KJD.L's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to 0KJD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0OHG.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0OHG.L has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0OHG.L trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0OHG.L's P/E ratio is -29.81. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0OHG.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to 0OHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs MDO.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, MDO.L has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while MDO.L trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas MDO.L's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDO.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to MDO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0QS9.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0QS9.L has a market cap of 969.57M. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0QS9.L trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0QS9.L's P/E ratio is -13.18. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0QS9.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to 0QS9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs DAL.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, DAL.L has a market cap of 934.74M. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while DAL.L trades at $442.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas DAL.L's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAL.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to DAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs 0OQ0.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, 0OQ0.L has a market cap of 689.04M. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while 0OQ0.L trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas 0OQ0.L's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to 0OQ0.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is more volatile compared to 0OQ0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs PPH.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, PPH.L has a market cap of 550.70M. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while PPH.L trades at $1,316.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas PPH.L's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPH.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to PPH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.
WTB.L vs SSTY.L Comparison
WTB.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WTB.L stands at 4.99B. In comparison, SSTY.L has a market cap of 13.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WTB.L is priced at $2,838.00, while SSTY.L trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WTB.L currently has a P/E ratio of 20.13, whereas SSTY.L's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, WTB.L's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSTY.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WTB.L is less volatile compared to SSTY.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WTB.L.