Ishares V PLC - Ishares Msci World Financials Sector UCITS ETF
Ishares V PLC - Ishares Msci World Financials Sector UCITS ETF WFNS.AS Peers
See (WFNS.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFNS.AS | $6.95 | +0.06% | 115.28M | 16.10 | $0.43 | +2.27% |
| IWDA.AS | $99.83 | -0.28% | 91.30B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | $99.81 | -0.24% | 58.10B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| VWRL.AS | $127.88 | -0.25% | 33.42B | N/A | N/A | +1.58% |
| IUSA.AS | $52.45 | -0.24% | 15.65B | N/A | N/A | +1.08% |
| AMUN.PA | $74.55 | -0.93% | 15.17B | 11.70 | $6.37 | +5.50% |
| ISFA.AS | $10.01 | -0.41% | 14.74B | N/A | N/A | +3.50% |
| HAL.AS | $119.20 | -0.17% | 10.77B | 8.91 | $13.38 | +2.39% |
| PSH.AS | $51.60 | N/A | 9.41B | 4.41 | $11.69 | +1.17% |
| MEUD.PA | $258.60 | -0.17% | 8.94B | 17.26 | $14.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WFNS.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 91.30B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IWDA.AS trades at $99.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 58.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while VUSA.AS trades at $99.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 33.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while VWRL.AS trades at $127.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IUSA.AS trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while AMUN.PA trades at $74.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.74B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ISFA.AS trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 10.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while HAL.AS trades at $119.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.41B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while PSH.AS trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MEUD.PA trades at $258.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IMEU.AS trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while GBLB.BR trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 298.54. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while SOF.BR trades at $252.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 7.49B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while WLD.PA trades at $340.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs I500.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while I500.AS trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while I50D.AS trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while LCWD.PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IWRD.AS trades at $73.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CC4.PA trades at $221.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while VHYL.AS trades at $63.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs 500.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while 500.PA trades at $103.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while AEME.PA trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while PHAU.AS trades at $264.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while GOLD.PA trades at $112.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CW8.PA trades at $545.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IJPA.AS trades at $52.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while KBCA.BR trades at $62.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while VEUR.AS trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ECRP.PA trades at $52.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while SP5C.PA trades at $377.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs RF.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while RF.PA trades at $68.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -80.29. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while S500H.PA trades at $82.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs S500.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while S500.PA trades at $148.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while USAC.PA trades at $533.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IEMM.AS trades at $41.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EUEA.AS trades at $55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ICHD.AS trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs USA.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while USA.PA trades at $490.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while 500X.AS trades at $36.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while REINA.AS trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ICHN.AS trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CACC.PA trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CAC.PA trades at $78.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while C50U.PA trades at $157.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while WSRI.PA trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MSE.PA trades at $59.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MF.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MF.PA trades at $90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.82. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while AUEM.PA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs C50.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while C50.PA trades at $140.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CD5.PA trades at $86.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ROLA.AS trades at $64.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while VERX.AS trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while BREB.BR trades at $115.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while AEEM.PA trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while TKO.PA trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ALLFG.AS trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while WESE.PA trades at $69.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CSH2.PA trades at $106.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CB3.PA trades at $218.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EEUE.PA trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while SEMD.AS trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs UST.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while UST.PA trades at $76.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ESE.PA trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while GEMU.PA trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EUSRI.PA trades at $86.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EHYA.AS trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EPAB.PA trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EXCH.AS trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while TDIV.AS trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while USRI.PA trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ANX.PA trades at $216.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs PABW.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while PABW.PA trades at $76.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs PEUG.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while PEUG.PA trades at $80.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ANTIN.PA trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while BNKE.PA trades at $239.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while TNOW.PA trades at $814.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CMUD.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CMUD.PA trades at $67.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EGOV.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EGOV.PA trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MUSD.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MUSD.AS trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs WAT.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while WAT.PA trades at $67.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs GIMB.BR Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while GIMB.BR trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EMPA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EMPA.AS trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MPAB.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MPAB.AS trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EGRI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EGRI.PA trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while AASI.PA trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs CG1.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while CG1.PA trades at $418.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs LWCR.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while LWCR.PA trades at $496.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while BNK.PA trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ACWI.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ACWI.PA trades at $472.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while PHAG.AS trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EXA1.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EXA1.AS trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs P500H.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, P500H.PA has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while P500H.PA trades at $37.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas P500H.PA's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to P500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs WQDA.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while WQDA.AS trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs DAX.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while DAX.PA trades at $215.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ESGE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ESGE.PA trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs ESGH.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while ESGH.PA trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs MTE.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, MTE.PA has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while MTE.PA trades at $196.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas MTE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to MTE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs TFG.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while TFG.AS trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs IX5A.AS Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, IX5A.AS has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while IX5A.AS trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas IX5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IX5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is more volatile compared to IX5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.
WFNS.AS vs EUDV.PA Comparison
WFNS.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFNS.AS stands at 115.28M. In comparison, EUDV.PA has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFNS.AS is priced at $6.95, while EUDV.PA trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFNS.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.10, whereas EUDV.PA's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, WFNS.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUDV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFNS.AS is less volatile compared to EUDV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFNS.AS.